[Samba] specifying groups: @ vs. +

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thomas Limoncelli wrote:

> which suggests that they should work equally in non-NIS 
> environments. Still, to double-check: is there any
> (even slight) overhead imposed by one vs. the other?

If not compiled with netgroup support, there is a
only the overhead of a single function call which
immediately returns.





cheers, jerry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEAzKtIR7qMdg1EfYRAgTeAKC1txa68VtnfP8iXKz2FKlegHPpuwCdEa4e
+Id3f8lVjLLweO2e/9+h7+Y=
=dcV/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----