[Samba] Re: Strange Usermapping problem with 3.0.23b

[David Shapiro]

What can we do if we have the 3.0.0.23c version already as far as the patch goes?
 
 
David Shapiro
Distributed Systems
Unix Team Lead
office: 919-765-2011
cellphone: 730-0538

>>> "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" <jerry at samba.org> 8/23/2006 3:10 PM >>>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Matthias Schündehütte wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
> 
> On 2006-08-21 23:09:05 +0200, "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" <jerry at samba.org>
> said:
> 
>> Does your username map use a ! to stop the parsing.
>> See the man page for details.
> 
> Sure! Your question made me uncertain since this could be a typical
> mistake for quick 'n dirty test setups, but I rechecked today: The
> exclamation marks are all there.
> 
> I found today another problem: Samba denied a usermapping with the
> message that a domaingroup with the same name exists... nice to know but
> who cares? If I want to access local unix files with the account 'foo',
> what does it matter if there is a windows domain group 'foo'?
> 
> I downgraded my production server to 3.0.22 today, but I have now a
> complete identical testserver (same os, same net, same hardware) to
> track down this misbehaviour.

In that case, would you test this patch against 3.0.23b?
http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/patch-3.0.23b-3.0.23c-gwc-1.diffs.gz



Thanks, jerry
=====================================================================
Samba                                    ------- http://www.samba.org
Centeris                         -----------  http://www.centeris.com
"What man is a man who does not make the world better?"      --Balian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFE7KhAIR7qMdg1EfYRAqeJAKCGOZPtL3qpErb+I/jjM0RqiAV35gCZAZc6
QIGQHNe/UCp1HMDYrD2Rnh0=
=LP6d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba