[Samba] performance regression between 30.14a and 3.0.20

Greg Dickie greg at max-t.com
Thu Apr 20 18:27:13 GMT 2006

So this is testing 14a and SVN on the exact same machine with the exact
same configuration. The only difference is switching samba RPM. I wanted
to get 14a numbers to cre-confirm the setup but unfortunately the KVM
seems to have gone on strike. More news as soon as possible.


On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 17:32 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 07:26:16PM -0400, Greg Dickie wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Jeremy,
> > 
> >   Bad news I'm afraid. Doesn't seem to be much of a difference between
> > that svn checkout and 3.0.20. Thats just the first run on it, we'll try
> > and poke it some more.
> > 
> > Thanks alot for your work on this,
> No problem. But I'm testing here on a Linux ram disk
> with ext2 as a target to remove any possible variance
> caused by disk activity and with iometer get equal
> performance (within noise values) between 3.0.14a and
> SVN SAMBA_3_0.
> Jeremy.
Greg Dickie
just a guy
Maximum Throughput

More information about the samba mailing list