[Samba] Re: Downgrade from 3 to 2 suggestions

[Stéphane Purnelle]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Stephen Carville a écrit :

> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> Stephen Carville wrote:
>>
>>> After considerable experimentation I'm forced to accept that
>>> Samba 3 has problems with the combination of being a domain
>>> member, the 2.6 kernel, and Dell 2850 hardware.
>>
>>
>> WORKSFORME, RHEL4, samba-3.0.20a, DELL Poweredge SC420.
>
>
> Highest revision I've tried was 3.0.10. I wouldn't think there
> would be that much difference but I'll give .20 a try. What've I
> got to lose? :-)
>

Just a comment :
With RHEL4, seLinux is activate by default.
Could you verify if is not the same problem with Fedora Core 4 and samba.

- --
Stéphane Purnelle <stephane.purnelle at tiscali.be>
Site Web : http://www.linuxplusvalue.be
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDTW1Y8tswkE3d0ecRArnUAJsGqrROBqryA29QDqDUA5OlT/vfSQCfRrrf
vKPpVX3VnulFtpzEWqGuU9U=
=Yitt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----