[Samba] Re: Downgrade from 3 to 2 suggestions
stephane.purnelle at tiscali.be
Wed Oct 12 20:08:57 GMT 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Stephen Carville a écrit :
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Stephen Carville wrote:
>>> After considerable experimentation I'm forced to accept that
>>> Samba 3 has problems with the combination of being a domain
>>> member, the 2.6 kernel, and Dell 2850 hardware.
>> WORKSFORME, RHEL4, samba-3.0.20a, DELL Poweredge SC420.
> Highest revision I've tried was 3.0.10. I wouldn't think there
> would be that much difference but I'll give .20 a try. What've I
> got to lose? :-)
Just a comment :
With RHEL4, seLinux is activate by default.
Could you verify if is not the same problem with Fedora Core 4 and samba.
Stéphane Purnelle <stephane.purnelle at tiscali.be>
Site Web : http://www.linuxplusvalue.be
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba