[Samba] Linux Primary Domain Controller Authentication

Craig White craigwhite at azapple.com
Fri Nov 11 04:58:52 GMT 2005

On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 09:29 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 11:01 -0200, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote:
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > Andrew Bartlett escreveu:
> > > On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 11:49 -0200, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote:
> > >>Did you disable "Require Sign or Seal" (I'm not sure if it is needed 
> > >>on w2k3).
> > >
> > > This has not been required in any release of Samba3.  
> > 
> > 	In early Samba3 releases, at least with w2k Brazilian versions,
> > (and it is about mid-2003), we need to disable the Require Sign or Seal
> > Local Policy to get MS Windows and Samba3 playing together. :)
> In Samba2 this applied, but I have no reports that this was required in
> *released* versions of Samba3.  I suspect it was something else.
> This is an important policy for network security, and the client can be
> compromised by an active network attack if it is not set.
this was one of the primary reasons that I proposed having a samba wiki
to dispel some of these legendary misinformations.

another thought was where to deflect people who ask about 'the endpoint
has disconnected' messages in logs.

one other thought was a samba troubleshooting checklist...


This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

More information about the samba mailing list