[Samba] policies primer posted

[Robert Schetterer]

Hi Eric,
this is no tattoted effect , the policy is simple holded ( kind of 
cached ) since it get upgraded
by another one , this behavior can be also controlled by the policy 
itself ,as far i remember it is an
parameter for that in the layouts of the group policy editor.
Keep care that you dont have policies whic are concurent for same or 
equal features,
this can lead to "magic" effects and think twice before setting a policy 
, it can take longer time to get it refreshed
i advice to read about policies in technet and google sites which are around
Best Regards
Eric A. Hall schrieb:

>Thanks for the catch, I added a paragraph on that point
>
>
>On 11/4/2005 4:43 AM, Ilia Chipitsine wrote:
>  
>
>>the greatest article in my opinion on that subject. really.
>>I could never find time to write my one.
>>
>>probably more attention should be paid to so called "tatoo effect":
>>
>>1) I write my custom template
>>2) I find it doesn't do what I want to do (after I propagated registry 
>>changes to users and computers)
>>...
>>3) I delete custom.adm from poledit list of template (with hope all 
>>changes we be restored)
>>4) obviously, changes remain in the registry
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>>>After trying to get all the policy stuff nailed down I figured I'd save
>>>others the trouble, so I wrote up a primer and posted it on my site at
>>>http://www.ehsco.com/reading/20051031.html
>>>
>>>Hoepfully that will save others some trouble
>>>
>>>-- 
>>>Eric A. Hall                                        http://www.ehsco.com/
>>>Internet Core Protocols          http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
>>>-- 
>>>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>>>instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>    
>>
>
>  
>