[Samba] Re: Weird authentication difference between smbclient and
carlos.efr at mail.telepac.pt
Fri May 6 00:48:45 GMT 2005
Paul Gienger wrote:
> smbmount => not made here, please go talk to the kernel boys
> mount -t cifs often works better than mount -t smbfs. Give that a try
> and then go talk to the kernel boys if it's still broken.
I understand that smbfs supports some older SMB dialects that cifs
doesn't, but why the need for two modules? Couldn't they be merged somehow?
Just saying this because the existence of two different ways of mounting
smb shares, (apparently) very similar, is kind of confusing.
Just wanting some info.
More information about the samba