[Samba] Re: [OT] SUSE 9.2 support

[Robert Schetterer]

the

konqueror bug is fixed , after a yast update as far i know for 9.2


David Phillips schrieb:

>On the other hand, I just dumped using suse 9.2 on my desktop and laptop
>because they have yet to fix the i/o error trying to browse mounted cifs
>shares via konqueror.  Fedora 3 works with them like a charm.  I guess
>they each have their pluses and minuses
>
>Dave P
>
>On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 01:43 +0100, Rolf A. Vaglid wrote:
>  
>
>>John Schmerold skrev:
>>    
>>
>>>I'm really sick of trying to get Fedora working with Samba & LDAP, I've 
>>>read all the books, technotes etc etc
>>>
>>>Still no glory after several months of fighting with it.
>>>
>>>So: I'm going to give SUSE 9.2 a shot, after 6 years of Red Hat, however 
>>>I'll certainly need some support & don't know which list &/or news 
>>>groups are "best"
>>>
>>>Anyone care to make a recommendation or two?
>>>      
>>>
>>Hi John, I have the exact opinion. I have tried several times setting up 
>>   Samba/LDAP on Redhat and Fedora, only to come to the same conclution 
>>as you. I ended up buying SuSE 9.2, and now it seems to work as a charm.
>>
>>I just spent a couple of hours setting up a Postfix/Dovecot/Horde -> pam 
>>-> OpenLDAP solution with no problems at all. I'll hook up 
>>authentication from a Samba server to this server tomorrow.
>>
>>My point is that it seems almost like SuSE had this scenario in mind in 
>>9.2, as opposed to Fedora et al. The reaseon I decided trying suse when 
>>giving up on Fedora was just the fact that John H. T. used Suse in his 
>>book "Samba 3 by Example". ( By the way; thanks John H. T. )
>>
>>I'll still go for Fedora on my desktops and laptop tho, mainly due to 
>>apt-get and the fact that most software packages are availible as Fedora 
>>   rpms.
>>
>>Do drop me a mail if you get into trouble on Samba/LDAP on SuSE.
>>
>>Cheers
>>Rolf
>>
>>    
>>
>
>  
>