[Samba] tdb locking errors?

[Tom Dickson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

O.K. I'm going to run this test again with logging up around 10 somewhere on a
clean install; hopefully that'll allow me to track it down.

I should have more information later today.

Jeremy Allison wrote:
| On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 12:56:47PM -0800, Tom Dickson wrote:
|
|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|>Hash: SHA1
|>
|>I was running a netbench performance test against Samba 3.0.11, and the
|>test has
|>not been able to complete fully.
|>
|>The samba logs contain lines such as this:
|>
|>[2005/02/28 11:35:23, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(645)
|>~  slave16 (192.168.133.116) connect to service netbench initially as user
|>BENCHLAB+slave16 (uid=10016, gid=10001) (pid 6599)[2005/02/28 11:41:14, 0]
|>tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725)
|>~  tdb(/var/lib/samba/locking.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 86 ltype=0
|>(Resource
|>deadlock avoided)
|>[2005/02/28 11:45:48, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725)
|>~  tdb(/var/lib/samba/locking.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 41 ltype=0
|>(Resource
|>deadlock avoided)
|>[2005/02/28 11:51:15, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725)
|>~  tdb(/var/lib/samba/locking.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 86 ltype=0
|>(Resource
|>deadlock avoided)
|>
|>Does this mean that we need to increase some parameter? Is there a known
|>failure
|>in this area, or could it be a misconfiguration of the clients?
|>
|>I'll be rerunning this test with more detailed logging as I try to track
|>this
|>issue down.
|>
|>Kernel 2.4.29
|>Samba 3.0.11
|>XFS filesystem
|
|
| Not a current known problem. As far as I know this should work.
|
| Jeremy.
|
| .
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCI5Yu2dxAfYNwANIRAgqCAKCr2MdMNcj/YWnZMza59ZNQaisGzACfYd5O
tseEvMBzm7Cf6f4TteNuUDg=
=/dg/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----