[Samba] is "security = share" maintained in 3.0.x?
Gerald (Jerry) Carter
jerry at samba.org
Wed Feb 9 12:31:04 GMT 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Carlos Knowlton wrote:
| I've been having a problem in Samba version 3, using "security =
| share". When you have a share that you want to be read-only to one
| group, and read-write to another. It ends up being read-write for both
| groups. This behavior seems inconsistent with Samba 2.2.x behavior.
| Have the configuration options changed, or is this a bug? This issue is
| listed on Samba's bugzilla site:
| and so far, the only reaction I've seen by talking to Samba people about
| it, is that "security = share" is major pain, and nobody wants to deal
| with it's problems. Is share level security being phased out of Samba,
| or am I just missing the right configuration options?
No. I wish we could kill it and security = server for that matter.
But I think we're going to have to fix this after all. I really
*hate* security = share.
Hopefully we'll be able to get to this for 3.0.12.
Alleviating the pain of Windows(tm) ------- http://www.samba.org
GnuPG Key ----- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba