[Samba] Re: LDAP account management tools?
Craig White
craigwhite at azapple.com
Mon Dec 19 13:41:10 GMT 2005
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 07:10 -0500, Matt Lung wrote:
>
> Craig White wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 10:32 -0500, Matt Lung wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>>----
> >>>There are lots of resources for getting support - this list is user
> >>>supported for free. Expecting personal attention to one's situation is
> >>>probably not reasonable. You can always contract for support, setup
> >>>assistance, etc.
> >>>
> >>>Craig
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Agreed, there are lots of resources for getting help. Of course
> >>expecting personal attention to one's problems is not always going to
> >>happen on a free platform. When I post to this list however I am asking
> >>for personal attention every time. If someone gives that attention back
> >>is another thing. But it is free support so you always must keep that
> >>in mind. Contracting for support for getting say your home network
> >>going??? Who is going to want to do that? Samba is not just used as an
> >>Enterprise server application. I'm just suggesting making it easier to
> >>setup and maintain so just keep an open mind.
> >>
> >>
> >----
> >
> >
> >of course home networking isn't going to involve LDAP (unless you are at
> >my house) so that isn't an issue and most of the distributions give you
> >a tool to configure samba for your home network now or you can always
> >use swat.
> >
> >
> >
> >This list is simply a users helping users and infrequently, when someone
> >is fortunate enough to have properly researched their problem and stated
> >it simply and clearly enough, they will get answers from samba
> >developers.
> >
> >These simple facts remain...
> >- open source usage requires the implementer to get involved in the
> >configuation details.
> >
> >- there aren't always nice, neat gui tools for these configuration
> >issues...remember, UNIX/Linux is about text based configuration files
> >and the gui tools tend to make a bludgeon of things that in text
> >form...can be organized, logical and easy enough to change with a simple
> >editor.
> >
> >- samba has the best documentation that I am aware of all open source
> >projects and because of the detail/scope/breadth, people don't want to
> >read it and instead, want to use the mail lists instead.
> >
> >- if we are talking about a business and there's no one on staff capable
> >of handling the issues involved, businesses pay for support.
> >
> >Craig
> >
> >
> >
>
> The simple fact was I was just asking if there were plans for a nice
> web-based server configuration/administration tool that would be offered
> up by the Samba team. Since your either part of the Samba Team or are
> speaking on their behalf, you could have simply said we don't have the
> developers to take on a project like this, or simply said NO we are not
> even thinking of doing a project like that. Good discussion though.
----
there is of course swat
and I am speaking on my own behalf and I have little knowledge of the
toolsets under development either in the 3.x or 4.x branches.
You should consider webmin <http://www.webmin.com> if you want a web
based interface to access/interact the smb.conf but I find that it makes
a mess of my organization of the smb.conf file and don't use it for that
purpose.
Craig
More information about the samba
mailing list