[Samba] Possible change to group behaviour from 3.0.14a-> 3.0.20?

Paul Gienger pgienger at ae-solutions.com
Thu Aug 25 13:58:47 GMT 2005


> I may be missing something, but it seems that there has been a change
> between 3.0.14a and 3.0.20 which means that a user's primary UNIX group
> HAS to be mapped to a valid NT group (i.e. the primary UNIX group in the
> LDAP DB has to have the sambagroupmapping attribute and a SID). Can
> anyone confirm this as a new requirement or am I being a bit stupid?

In my systems, I always noticed samba complaining if you didn't have the
users' primary group mapped, along with a note that "NT doesn't like that".



More information about the samba mailing list