[Samba] "getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected"

[Guido Lorenzutti]

Are you sure? In wich scenario? I have a pdc on samba and when i check 
the "netstat" i have a lot of open conections with the 445 port on the 
smbd binary.


Ed Kasky wrote:

> I went around and around with this issue for months replacing cables, 
> switches and nics on a couple of machines all to no avail.   I played 
> around with something I found in the archives:
>
> http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-April/084048.html
>
> Using iptables to drop port 445, I eliminated the errors.  I have not 
> seen the error return nor experienced any other negative impact on 
> performance.
>
> Ed
>
> At 08:36 AM Monday, 4/18/2005, Dimitri Yioulos wrote -=>
>
>> I've also seen a post somewhere (forgive, don't remember where 
>> "somewhere is)
>> suggesting that "smb ports = 445" would corect this issue.  So, which 
>> is it,
>> 139 or 445?
>>
>> Dimitri
>>
>> On Monday 18 April 2005 05:55 am, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
>> > I've already seen this in my logs...
>> > A little search on Google shows me that Windows XP client try try to
>> > connect to port 139 and 445 in parallel and drop the connection to 
>> port
>> > 139 if the connect to 445 is successful.
>> > In fact, no one was complaining about real network connection loss ...
>> > More informations here : http://www.linuxaa.com/ftopic6568.html
>> > Hope this helps.
>> >
>> > On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 03:58 -0300, Guido Lorenzutti wrote:
>> > > I get this error message "getpeername failed. Error was Transport
>> > > endpoint is not connected" in my logs very often. Any ideas how 
>> to fix
>> > > it?
>> > >
>> > > Tnxs in advance
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
>
> Ed Kasky
> ~~~~~~~~~
> Randomly Generated Quote (194 of 477):
> "Things may come to those who wait, but only the things
>  left by those who hustle."  - Abraham Lincoln
>