[Samba] still ACL bug in 3.0.14a

[Tom Schaefer]

Sigh.  Good catch Peter but I set up my test environment (Sparc Solaris 8,
UFS filesystem) to match what Jeremy used and still have the same
problem.

I set it up like this...

root at huckfinn:/accounts/staff/schaefer/tmp bash# ls -ld crap
d---rwx---+  2 root     root        1024 Apr 15 13:53 crap/

root at huckfinn:/accounts/staff/schaefer/tmp bash# getfacl crap

# file: crap
# owner: root
# group: root
user::---
user:schaefer:rwx               #effective:rwx
group::rwx              #effective:rwx
group:203:rwx           #effective:rwx
group:cfusion:rwx               #effective:rwx
mask:rwx
other:---

User schaefer still can't rename or delete files in the crap directory.

How frustrating.  Jeremy we don't do a lot of Linux around here but yes I
should be able to cobble a test together.

Also, Peter, I know you use Linux and have been seeing these exact same
symptoms, but have you actually tried it against 3.0.14a yet?

Tom Schaefer


On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:49:10 -0500
"Peter Kruse" <pk at q-leap.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> (please see below)
> 
> Jeremy Allison wrote:
> >>root at huckfinn:/accounts/staff/schaefer/tmp bash# getfacl crap
> >>
> >># file: crap
> >># owner: root
> >># group: root
> >>user::---
> >>group::---              #effective:---
> >>group:203:rwx           #effective:rwx
> >>group:cfusion:rwx               #effective:rwx
> >>mask:rwx
> >>other:---
> >>
> 
> > # getfacl crap
> > 
> > # file: crap
> > # owner: root
> > # group: root
> > user::---
> > user:jeremy:rwx
> > group::---
> > group:jeremy:rwx
> > mask::rwx
> > other::---
> > 
> > User jeremy can create/delete and modify files from a cmd.exe shell
> > and Windows explorer to his hearts content, no problems.
> > 
> 
> The difference is that you gave write permissions to user jeremy.  In
> the other example, permissions are granted _only_ to the group the
> user belongs to.  So you have to remove the user:jeremy:rwx to
> see the bug.
> 
> 	Peter
> 
> > It's possible this is a Solaris specific issue. Can you reproduce
> > the problem with 3.0.14a on a Linux box ?
> > 
> 
>