[Samba] Windows Update using samba

[Robert Schetterer]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi ,
troubles with sus are not samba related,
guess your policy isnt done
cause it should named NTConfig.POL ( from Samba faqs )
it works right good here with sus
Regards
Andrew Bartlett schrieb:
> On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 11:42 -0500, Cesar Sanabria Pineda wrote:
> 
>>Hi, Im' trying to put a SUS server on my network, iv'e already installed
>>it, i've a PDC using samba, and my clients get registry configuration to
>>get the updates using a Netconfig.pol file this parts works ok.
>>
>>So I'm having troubles with my clients, they don't get the updates from
>>the server when they are into the samba domain it looks like they don't
>>see the sus server, i tried adding SUS server to the domain but it
>>doesn't work; on the other hand when they are independent (outside the
>>domain) the get the updates and install them (using the same registr
>>configuration). So anybody knows what is the problem here?
> 
> 
> SUS is served out via HTTP I think, so it really should not matter
> regarding domain membership - I think your policy options might not be
> correct.
> 
> Andrew Bartlett
> 
> 

- --
Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Best Regards
Robert Schetterer

robert_at_schetterer.org
Munich / Bavaria / Germany
https://www.schetterer.org

\**********************************
\* gnupgp
\* public key:
\* https://www.schetterer.org/public.key
\**********************************
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCUjSB+Jw+56iSjEkRAv61AJsFMKE5FECrpj9SM65tPMy23LkLEgCfeO/U
+YeuK8UQo4W6V65I59AMFrk=
=UuZU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----