[Samba] Maximum file system size accessed with samba
Thibaud Tourneur
thibaud.tourneur at dbee.com
Fri Oct 1 10:12:19 GMT 2004
Hi !
I would like to connect a Linux machine A and a WindowsNT machine B
to a machine S running under WindowsNT hosting raided disks (see
graphics below). The constraint is that the disks are seen as unique
partition of (really) more than 2TB (two terabytes).
+-------------------+ ,-'`-.
S | WindowsNT |--|RAID| > 2TB (>> 2TB)
|NFSv3srv SMBsrv| `-..-'
+-------------------+
/ \
+----------+ +----------+
| NFSv3clt | | SMBclt |
| | | |
| Linux | | WindowsNT|
+----------+ A B +----------+
I've already got the certitude that an NFSv3 client (on A) is able
to access the whole capacity of the hosted partition (on S) with an
NFSv3 server.
I would like to know if a SAMBA client (on B) would as well be able
to access the whole capacity of the hosted partition (on S) with the
appropriate SAMBA server. Especially, if this is possible, I'd need to
know whether Windows2003 is required or Windows2000 (or XP) is good enough.
Today, I'm using an alternate solution using A (linux) as a relay
between S (windows hosting disks) and B (windows) (see graphics below).
Machine A has a samba server and B a samba client. And by the way, I
would also like to know if linux samba server have limitations on shared
filesystem size, and if not, what versions (client and server) are required.
+-------------------+ ,-'`-.
S | Windows |--|RAID| > 2TB (>> 2TB)
|NFSv3srv | `-..-'
+-------------------+
/
+----------+ +----------+
| NFSv3clt | | |
| `-SMBsrv| ------------ |SMBclt |
| Linux | | Windows |
+----------+ A B +----------+
Thanks for any answer.
--
Thibaud Tourneur
DBee
--------------------------------
email: thibaud.tourneur at dbee.com
--------------------------------
More information about the samba
mailing list