[Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]

Chris Garrigues cwg-dated-1088889520.02aaf4 at deepeddy.com
Mon Jun 28 21:18:39 GMT 2004

> From:  Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>
> Date:  Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:54:23 -0700
> > P.S.  I've turned oplocks off on the customer's server.  Am I correct in 
> > thinking that will mask the problem so they won't see it?
> Yes, it will. Are you sure you're running the SVN code. I did fix a bug
> recently (friday I think) that would cause a client to get a double return
> from a rename which might have caused that. Unless it's that, it doesn't
> look like a deferred open problem.

My customer is running a week-old SVN, I'm running one from this morning.  
Sounds like I should put this morning's SVN on their machine and leave oplocks 


Chris Garrigues                 http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions		http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX  78703-5074		512-322-0180

	    If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't 
	       learned anything.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 235 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20040628/d8f0a269/attachment.bin

More information about the samba mailing list