[Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
Jeremy Allison
jra at samba.org
Mon Jun 28 20:43:54 GMT 2004
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 10:01:55AM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote:
> > From: Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>
> > Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 17:55:03 -0700
> >
> > Ok, Chris - if you svn update you'll find I've added a new global parameter to
> > control the action of the defer open code. It's called
> >
> > "defer sharing violations" and it's set to "yes" by default (to emulate Windows
> > correctly). Can you svn update and try and reproduce your problem with
> > this parameter set to "yes". If you can, try setting it to "no" and seeing
> > if the problem goes away.
>
> I'm halfway there. It just failed with "defer sharing violations = Yes".
>
> I've changed the flag to "No". Since it doesn't always fail, I'll try all day
> to get it to fail. If it fails, I'll let you know. If it doesn't, I'll put
> it on my client's network this evening and let you know how well it works
> there.
Can you try with : "defer sharing violations = Yes" but
kernel oplocks = no
oplocks = yes
level2 oplocks = yes
Also. I'm starting to think it may be an interaction between
Linux kernel oplocks and deferred opens.
Jeremy.
More information about the samba
mailing list