[Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]

Jeremy Allison jra at samba.org
Mon Jun 28 20:43:54 GMT 2004

On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 10:01:55AM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote:
> > From:  Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>
> > Date:  Fri, 25 Jun 2004 17:55:03 -0700
> >
> > Ok, Chris - if you svn update you'll find I've added a new global parameter to
> > control the action of the defer open code. It's called
> > 
> > "defer sharing violations" and it's set to "yes" by default (to emulate Windows
> > correctly). Can you svn update and try and reproduce your problem with
> > this parameter set to "yes". If you can, try setting it to "no" and seeing
> > if the problem goes away.
> I'm halfway there.  It just failed with "defer sharing violations = Yes".
> I've changed the flag to "No".  Since it doesn't always fail, I'll try all day 
> to get it to fail.  If it fails, I'll let you know.  If it doesn't, I'll put 
> it on my client's network this evening and let you know how well it works 
> there.

Can you try with : "defer sharing violations = Yes" but

kernel oplocks = no
oplocks = yes
level2 oplocks = yes

Also. I'm starting to think it may be an interaction between
Linux kernel oplocks and deferred opens.


More information about the samba mailing list