[Samba] Upgrade question - please be gentle! - failed dependencies?

rruegner robert at ruegner.org
Thu Jul 29 16:42:08 GMT 2004


havent done that , but should work

Hamish schrieb:
> Thanks Craig,
> Will it work if I remove samba 3.0.3 completely (rpm -e) and then 
> install 3.0.5?
> 
> Craig White wrote:
> 
>> This is an act of pure desperation and nothing that I could ever in good
>> conscience suggest to someone. Not charming doesn't begin to describe
>> the consequences that may occur.
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 03:36, rruegner wrote:
>>  
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> i updated my systems with the killing method
>>> rpm --nodeps --force
>>> i know this is not charming but it worked with the suse packs since 
>>> samba 3.0 up to samba 3.04
>>> but i strongly recommend to test this first on a test system !!!!
>>> Best Regards
>>>
>>> Hamish schrieb:
>>>   
>>>
>>>> Thanks for you help, I tried to update with rpm -Uvh and it found a 
>>>> lot of failed dependencies: liblber.so.199, libldap.so.199, 
>>>> libpopt.so.199 etc - did you have these same problems?
>>>>
>>>> rruegner wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>> Hi, i have a big smb/ldap setup and running
>>>>> with 3.04 but with kernel 2.4.21 suse 9
>>>>> and i had no Problems with updating it ( all the way up from 
>>>>> version 3.0-3.04) it worked all like charme as before,
>>>>> but i recommend to use samba packs from ftp suse projects samba, or 
>>>>> self compiled....yesterday i looked there there where patched 3.04 
>>>>> packs against the swat sec bug ,but no 3.05
>>>>>
>>>>> I know problems with sernet suse samba packs after update relating 
>>>>> to cups
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Hamish schrieb:
>>>>>
>>>>>       
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am planning to upgrade our production samba server 
>>>>>> (3.0.3pre2-SuSE on SuSE 9.0, kernel 2.6.5-10) tonight to 3.0.5. Is 
>>>>>> there anything I should know about things breaking during this 
>>>>>> upgrade? I will just do it with `rpm -Uvh --repackage samba*` - I 
>>>>>> have tried this on a test server and it seems to work ok, but if 
>>>>>> anyone has some info that might be useful I would be grateful!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> H
>>>>>>         
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>       
>>
>>
>>  
>>


More information about the samba mailing list