[Samba] Re: Samba 2 or Samba 3

[Jim C.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

You don't want to have to go through the database upgrade if you don't
need to.  Go with 3.x

Jim C.

| I am planning using Samba (on Solaris 7) as a PDC for Windows NT4 & 2000
| Server. Connecting it to a LDAP server.   There will be 4 different PDC (1
| in each DMZ) sharing the same username (same LDAP server).
|
| I want to know the major difference between Samba 2 and Samba 3, which one
| is more stable and which one would fix better in my architecture plans.


- --

- -----------------------------------------------------------------
| I can be reached on the following Instant Messenger services: |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| MSN: j_c_llings at hotmail.com  AIM: WyteLi0n  ICQ: 123291844 	|
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| Y!: j_c_llings               Jabber: jcllings at njs.netlab.cz	|
- -----------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFA6ITR57L0B7uXm9oRAqJ7AJ4lp4YXuqcBpUizz/rsUZUV2S/uoACgiEiN
9tsuUyV4kVkfXuJHOwvU4HI=
=Bxv/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----