[Samba] spam (way offtopic, sorry ;-)

[Thiago Lima]

USER_IN_WHITELIST,  SpamAssassin knows some famous mailing lists and put
a very big value for then.

regards
thiago.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> samba-bounces+thiagolima=webforce.com.br at lists.samba.org 
> [mailto:samba-bounces+thiagolima=webforce.com.br at lists.samba.o
> rg] On Behalf Of Sam Hart
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 5:07 PM
> To: samba at lists.samba.org
> Subject: [Samba] spam (way offtopic, sorry ;-)
> 
> 
> In the Spam that made it onto this list yesterday I took the 
> time to look 
> into the headers (out of curiosity) and I found this:
> 
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 
> (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
>         dp.samba.org
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-84.0 required=3.5 
> tests=BANG_GUARANTEE,BAYES_99,
>         BEST_PORN,CLICK_BELOW_CAPS,DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12,HTML_50_60,
>         
> HTML_LINK_CLICK_CAPS,HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE,HTML_MESSAGE,LESBIAN,
>         LIVE_PORN,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=2.61
> 
> So SpamAssassin (which I am a big fan of, BTW) scanned the 
> message and 
> somehow determine that the hits for it should be -84 in spite 
> of all the 
> various marks against it? What's up with that?
> 
> Uh... could it be that the Samba lists server isn't set up 
> properly for 
> SpamAssassin? Anyway, perhaps someone should point that out 
> to whomever is 
> maintaining the lists on samba.org ;-)
> 
> (Sorry for OT, I just found that very odd indeed ;-)
> 
> -- 
> Sam Hart
> University/Work addr. <hart at physics.arizona.edu>
> Personal addr. <criswell at geekcomix.com>
> Alternative <criswell at tux4kids.net>
> end
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>