[Samba] Secondary, tertiary group problems in Samba LDAP

[Kent L. Nasveschuk]

I don't, is it essential for this to work correctly?


On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 10:52, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 7 Jan 2004, Kent L. Nasveschuk wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > I found an interesting thing that I don't know if it is a bug, by design
> > or I need to be doing something that I'm not but here goes.
> >                                                                                 
> > My system
> > RedHat 8.0 (1) PDC with LDAP 2.1.23 backend master,
> > (3) BDC with LDAP slave backend. All are Samba 3.0.
> >                                                                                 
> > I had a probelem with secondary, tertiary etc groups that people belong
> > to and Samba recognizing these groups if they were stored in LDAP. The
> > primary group was no problem. When I created shares but used
> > "@groupname"  for valid users or write list, Samba would fail to get
> > that info from LDAP. They needed to be in /etc/group to work. As soon as
> > I added users in secondary groups to /etc/group users were recognized
> > and rights were assigned.
> 
> do you have nss_ldap setup correctly?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> cheers, jerry
>  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Hewlett-Packard            ------------------------- http://www.hp.com
>  SAMBA Team                 ---------------------- http://www.samba.org
>  GnuPG Key                  ---- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
>  "If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song" --Switchfoot (2003)
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/
> 
> iD8DBQE//s5YIR7qMdg1EfYRApHUAKDfecFReHBdV4XU8femIsKXkbdR5wCg6Rxa
> 2DWV4KTXVLdyl22z1Tkcjzs=
> =ptcK
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
Kent L. Nasveschuk <kent at wareham.k12.ma.us>