[Samba] Transparently replacing a 2.2.7 PDC with 3.0
Etienne Goyer
etienne.goyer at linuxquebec.com
Wed Feb 11 15:25:25 GMT 2004
Hi,
I sent this post yesterday morning for a first time, but apparently
Gmane ate it as it never showed up. I am reposting. All my apologies
if you receive this port in duplicate.
I tried to replace a Samba 2.2.7 PDC to a 3.0 transparently, and it did
not work. For my explanation, we will call the Samba 2.2.7 PDC samba2,
the new Samba 3 server samba3 and the domain DOMAIN.
First, I migrate (by hand) all the users from samba2 to samba3; I copied
smbpasswd, then cut-n-pasted the users and workstations account in
/etc/passwd with vipw. Tested it, it seem to work well. At this point,
samba3 is PDC for a temporary domain I called TEST.
Then I retrieved the SID of DOMAIN by doing "net getlocalsid DOMAIN".
Kept it for later.
I shutted down samba2. I edited smb.conf on samba3 to set the same
workgroup name, netbios name, various config and share definition.
Restart Samba on samba3. Set the SID to the one previously retrieved
with "net setlocalsid <SID previously retrieved>". Restarted samba3 again.
Win9x clients worked correctly, no problems (as expected). NT-based
clients complained about not finding the domain. I guessed I screwed up
the SID change, so I copied secrets.tdb from samba2 to samba3 and
restart Samba on samba3. It still did not work.
Finally, I joined the NT-based clients by hand (fortunately, there was
not many) and it worked.
Since I have many Samba 2.2.x -> 3.0 PDC migration coming in near-term
future, I was wondering what I did wrong and if there is a work around
it. Is it possible to change a Samba PDC in a totally transparent
fashion for the clients ? Are there any known issue doing it from Samba
2.2.x to 3.0 ?
Thanks for your answer !
More information about the samba
mailing list