[Samba] Re: md5 fail on large file

[Marco Berizzi]

I have switched back to samba 2.2.8a (compiled
from source) on linux 2.6.5: same behaviour.


Marco Berizzi wrote:

> Me again. I have upgraded to linux kernel
> 2.6.5. However this problem hasn't gone away.
> The md5 check is fine, coping the same file
> from NT4TSE to a Windoze 2000sp4.
> Coping the same file from a windoze 2000sp4
> to the samba share is ok. So the problem is
> between NT4TSE and samba.
> 
> NT4TSE --> SAMBA = KO
> WIN2k  --> SAMBA = OK
> NT4TSE --> WIN2K = OK
> 
> Can anybody help me?


> Marco Berizzi wrote:


> > Hello everybody.
> > 
> > I'm experimenting this problem with
> > samba 3.0.2a and linux 2.4.25 with
> > ReiserFS.
> > When I copy (put) a large file (5GB)
> > from a Windows NT terminal server sp6a
> > to the samba-linux box, the md5sum is
> > different between the two file. Files
> > size are identical.
> > I'm using this command to copy these
> > files from windows to samba:
> > 
> > xcopy f:\ \\mimas\backup\exchange /e /c /h /r
> > 
> > I have also tried to delete the old
> > files from the samba share, but nothing
> > change: I always get two different md5sum.
> > With smaller files (400MB) md5sum is
> > identical.
> > When I transfer this large file with ftp
> > (proftpd 1.2.9 on Linux), md5sum is ok.
> > 
> > These two systems are connected to a 3COM
> > 100bit/s switch. No collision/no error are
> > detected at linux side box. Samba doesn't
> > log anything relevant. No kernel error.
> > Nothing. Samba box is running Slackware 9.1
> > + kernel 2.4.25 + samba 3.0.2a compiled
> > from sources.
> > 
> > Hints?
> > 
> > PS: Please CC me I'm not subscribed to this list.