RE : [Samba] OOT : Puzzling
Jérôme Fenal
jerome.fenal at logicacmg.com
Tue Sep 30 19:57:44 GMT 2003
Hi,
It is not a Samba issue, but a RH9 one.
Try to replace in /etc/sysconfig/i18n the default charset utf8 to something easier (and faster) to handle for the system (look at the same file on your RH73).
HTH,
Jérôme
-------- Message d'origine--------
De: Stefan G. Weichinger [mailto:monitor at oops.co.at]
Date: mar. 9/30/2003 20:23
À: samba at lists.samba.org
Cc:
Objet: Re: [Samba] Puzzling
Hi Wayne,
am Dienstag, 30. September 2003 um 18:32 schrieben Sie:
w> Dear List:
w> I have installed the lastest Samba 3.0 onto an AMD 2.6 GHz RedHat 9.0
w> system running mirrored SCSI drives. The system is multi homed as such:-
w> eth0 - 192.168.50.5
w> - 192.168.100.199
w> eth1 - public IP address
What do you mean? eth0 has 2 adresses or what?
What does ifconfig tell you?
w> I connect from an XP Home box to a Samba share via the 192.168.1.0/24
w> subnet, mapped as Drive Z and performed the following file transfers.
Samba (Z:) ->> Samba (Z:) 928 MB folder 20 mins
Samba (Z:) ->> XP (C:) 928 MB folder 21 mins
XP (C:) ->> Samba (Z:) 928 MB folder 3 mins
You smb.conf tells us other things:
hosts allow = 192.168.50. 192.168.1. 127.
bind interfaces only = TRUE
Leave this one out unless you really know what to use it for.
#interfaces = eth0 eth0:1 lo
interfaces = 192.168.50.5 192.168.1.100 127.0.0.1
You talk about 192.168.100.199 but use the 192.168.1.100 adress. Check
your IPs on the Samba box and on the XP box and edit your smb.conf to
the right "interfaces" and "hosts allow" options. To make it easier
use the line
interfaces = eth0 eth1
and leave out the "bind interfaces"-line. It will bind to your subnets
nicely, you avoid typos and readjusting smb.conf when changing IPs.
Did you map Z: to the [Oasis]-share ?
> [Oasis]
> comment = Oasis Data & Programs
> path = /thelook/Oasis
> public = yes
> writable = yes
> printable = no
> write list = @oasis
> force create mode = 0770
> force group = +oasis
> oplocks = False
> level2 oplocks = False
> blocking locks = no
With the last 3 options you basically set your performance down.
Drastically. I donZt know if you really want them to be set like this.
At least I would comment them out for testing.
Do your log-files say something special? Set "log level" to 1 or 2 and
look at your files. Compare the results for the 2 installations.
On the other hand, what do you mean by "If I replace the mirrored SCSI
drive with a SCSI drive..." ? Might it be simply a difference in
harddisk performance? (Again, let the locking-parameters away and let
the OS do its work handling the locks ...)
Let us know more details ...
best regards,
Stefan G. Weichinger
mailto:monitor at oops.co.at
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
LogicaCMG global sponsors, Gartner Symposium, Cannes, 4th -7th November 2003
http://symposium.gartner.com/story.php.id.3323.s.5.html
Please note that LogicaCMG does not have control over content from,or availability of, this website
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager. LogicaCMG
**********************************************************************
More information about the samba
mailing list