[Samba] Multiple PDCs, Single Domain
mschilli at vss.fsi.com
Mon Sep 15 15:32:36 GMT 2003
On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 09:05, Dariush Forouher wrote:
> Am Fr, 2003-09-12 um 22.51 schrieb Matt Schillinger:
> > Hello,
> > I have a rather experimental question to ask.
> > I know that under standard circumstances, that you cannot have multiple
> > PDC for a single domain, as they will conflict with each other.
> > I am dealing with a case of a school district, where there are multiple
> > buildings.There are T-1s that tie together each of the buildings, then a
> > bonded T-1 grants access to the internet through the main admin
> > building. They would like to have a single domain, but would like to
> > keep T-1 traffic to a minimum. They also want to continue with service
> > when T-1 outages occur.
> > What I was wondering is, if this could be made possible..
> > a PDC at each building, that ties into a slave LDAP server.
> The only way to archive this, would be to hide those PDCs from each
> other. So you would have to block ports 137-139 at each T1 router.
Would there still be a way that nmbd could be setup so that all hosts
would be visible in Network Neighborhood?
> > At the Administration Building, There is a master LDAP Server.
> > Optimally, if the Administration building could have a single BDC
> > (Obviously, BDC functionality would only be available when T-1
> > connectivity is functioning), that would be great.
> > I am wondering if this could somehow be accomplished with intelligent
> > usage of nmbd services keeping PDC selection problems out of the way..
> > Optimally, having a method of a full mapping of all hosts via nmbd would
> > be the best scenario, proxying to a central wins server. I fear that may
> > result in PDC in-fighting..
> I have to admit that I don't see why you can't live live one PDC and X
> BDCs. You would have construct your LDAP servers this way anyway. If a
> PDC goes down (or the connection breaks) the BDC would still be able
> process logons on his own.
The only Problem here is resources. The plan is that there are already
machines that can be used as PDC, one per building. However, there isn't
budget for a BDC per building, so the hope was to have a single BDC at
the main building.. I can see that this would be difficult, particularly
if ports 137-139 were blocked at T1 Router.
mschilli at vss.fsi.com
More information about the samba