[Samba] security

Erik Soderquist esoderquist at mcstamp.com
Mon Oct 13 19:46:49 GMT 2003

Reason I ask, I have SCO 5.0.? With samba installed and it looks like ACL's are not an option for this machine. I'm looking at replacing both the SCO box and some win2k servers with linux (redhat 9). The main file server isn't an option without the ACL's though. What versions of samba have the ACL support?

-----Original Message-----
From: Alexey Lobanov [mailto:aal at evidence-cpr.com] 
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 15:33
To: Erik Soderquist
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: [Samba] security

Hi Erik.

On 13 Oct 2003 at 15:23, Erik Soderquist wrote:

Subject:        	RE: [Samba] security
Date sent:      	Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:23:27 -0400
From:           	"Erik Soderquist" <esoderquist at mcstamp.com>
To:             	<samba at lists.samba.org>

> Can these be adjusted from a windows workstation, or must they be adjusted from
> the *nix machine?

Surely, WinNT(4,5) "Security" tab works fine. Win9x assumed to be dead.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gйmes Gйza [mailto:geza at kzsdabas.sulinet.hu] 
> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 14:18
> To: Erik Soderquist
> Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: [Samba] security
> WARNING: Unsanitized content follows.
> Hash: SHA1
> Erik Soderquist нrta:
> | In windows, I can set user1 to read only, user2 to full control, user3
> | to write only, user 4 to modify, user 5 to delete only, user 6 to no
> | direct access but can change permissions, etc. can I, how can I set this
> | kind of granular permission with samba on linux?
> You should use samba with acl support, on top of an acl enabled
> filesystem, e.g.:

More information about the samba mailing list