[Samba] Request for ACL experiences
ben.tullis at infomatrix.com
Fri Oct 31 15:17:53 GMT 2003
I have had some dubious experiences using the ACL features of Samba 3.0.0
At present I have rolled-back our production servers to 2.2.8a
(--with-acl ) but I hope that they will be ironed-out by 3.0.1 and I can
The problems manifested themselves in two client applications, CVS and
Quickbooks althouth there was only 24'ish hours of live use before the
decision was made to roll-back.
The CVS problem went thus.
CVS repositories held on an ext3+acl partition, access by samba with
"force-user=someuser" and "valid users=@somegroup"
CVS working directories held on [homes] share
When performing a "cvs edit" or "cvs unedit" the permissions of the
files were not being set to read-only correctly. It was possible to set
these permissions using the standard Windows file property dialogs.
Since much of our work uses CVS intensively, this would not do. This
behaviour ocurred whether or not oplocks were employed.
The Quickbooks problem was nasty but I think I could have got around it
The kernel is 2.4.21 +ea+acl The shares are exported via patched NFS for
version 3 NFS clients only.
2.2.8a has plenty of quirks with ACL's enabled but I won't go into those
More information about the samba