[Samba] 2 nics, browsing

Rashkae rashkae at tigershaunt.com
Mon Oct 27 16:22:46 GMT 2003


Err no no no... You cannot have the same computer (netBIOS name) on two different IP addresses.  Maybe if you tell us what you are trying to achieve with this bizzare setup, we can advise a way to achieve it.

On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 03:46:06PM +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> 
> I have problems with browsing, AFAI see ...
> 
> There are 2 Samba 3.0-hosts in the subnet 192.168.16. called server
> and backup. The workgroup is buero.
> 
> server has 2 NICs with the ips 192.168.16.200 and 192.168.16.201.
> backup has one NIC with ip 192.168.16.112.
> 
> server is configured with the options:
> 
> local master=yes
> preferred master=yes
> os type=40
> 
> backup with:
> os type=20
> local master=yes
> 
> (to provide backup-browser-service).
> 
> interfaces parameter is not set.
> I want Samba to use both NICs on server.
> 
> testparm runs ok on each host.
> 
> Look at these lines:
> 
> > server:~ # nmblookup -M buero
> > querying buero on 192.168.16.255
> > 192.168.16.201 buero<1d>
> > 192.168.16.201 buero<1d>
> > server:~ #
> 
> So I get two answers over the localhost-interface, I assume. Why is it
> two times the .201-ip?
> 
> If I try the same from backup:
> 
> > backup:~ # nmblookup -M buero
> > added interface ip=192.168.16.112 bcast=192.168.16.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
> > querying buero on 192.168.16.255
> > Got a positive name query response from 192.168.16.201 ( 192.168.16.201 )
> > Got a positive name query response from 192.168.16.201 ( 192.168.16.201 )
> > Got a positive name query response from 192.168.16.201 ( 192.168.16.201 )
> > Got a positive name query response from 192.168.16.201 ( 192.168.16.201 )
> > 192.168.16.201 buero<1d>
> > 192.168.16.201 buero<1d>
> > 192.168.16.201 buero<1d>
> > 192.168.16.201 buero<1d>
> 
> I get four responses ....
> 
> Question: Should the backup:/etc/hosts contain both ips of server
> like:
> 
> 192.168.16.200 server
> 192.168.16.201 server
> 
> How should this be handled?
> 
> I know this is another topic but has possibly the same reason:
> 
> > backup:~ # tail /var/log/messages
> > Oct 27 15:20:06 backup sshd[21744]: Could not reverse map address 192.168.16.201.
> > Oct 27 15:20:06 backup sshd[21744]: Accepted rsa for root from ::ffff:192.168.16.201 port 46587
> 
> Reverse DNS ... I will look that up, I promise ...
> I think that
> 
> ... this ...
> 
> > server:~ # tail /var/log/messages
> > Oct 27 15:22:19 server nmbd[1318]:   find_response_record: response packet id 19864 received with no matching record.
> > Oct 27 15:22:20 server nmbd[1318]: [2003/10/27 15:22:20, 0] nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c:find_response_record(235)
> > Oct 27 15:22:20 server nmbd[1318]:   find_response_record: response packet id 19863 received with no matching record.
> > Oct 27 15:22:20 server nmbd[1318]: [2003/10/27 15:22:20, 0] nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c:find_response_record(235)
> 
> ... and this ...
> 
> > backup:~ # tail /var/log/samba/log.nmbd
> > query_name_response: Multiple (3) responses received for a query on subnet 192.168.16.112 for name BUERO<1d>.
> > This response was from IP 192.168.16.201, reporting an IP address of 192.168.16.201.
> > query_name_response: Multiple (4) responses received for a query on subnet 192.168.16.112 for name BUERO<1d>.
> > This response was from IP 192.168.16.201, reporting an IP address of 192.168.16.201.
> > query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses received for a query on subnet 192.168.16.112 for name BUERO<1d>.
> > This response was from IP 192.168.16.201, reporting an IP address of 192.168.16.201.
> > query_name_response: Multiple (3) responses received for a query on subnet 192.168.16.112 for name BUERO<1d>.
> > This response was from IP 192.168.16.201, reporting an IP address of 192.168.16.201.
> > query_name_response: Multiple (4) responses received for a query on subnet 192.168.16.112 for name BUERO<1d>.
> > This response was from IP 192.168.16.201, reporting an IP address of 192.168.16.201.
> > backup:~ #
> 
> ... results from the same wrong configuration .
> 
> Am I right? What should I do about it?
> 
> Thank you,
> Stefan G. Weichinger
> mailto:monitor at oops.co.at
> 
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



More information about the samba mailing list