[Samba] Which Linux best suits Samba3?
Tim Jordan
timothy_jordan at labor.state.ak.us
Mon Nov 24 21:07:11 GMT 2003
I just tried installing Samba 3 rpm from samba.org on a fedora1 box and
it failed to install"
missing libcom_err.so.3
I take it Fedora is using a different set of libs. Any advice on how to
resolve this or do I roll back to redhat 8 or 9?
I've been trying and trying to get samba 3 to work with Gentoo....no
joy!
Tim
On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 14:26, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-11-22 at 05:40, Eric Geater 11/18/03 wrote:
> > In a discussion with one of the main answer people, of whose time I am
> > greatly appreciative, it was suggested that some of my problem (or
> > solution) may be to run Samba on a distro that's better suited for it.
> > Problem is, I don't have the time nor the inclination to download a
> > bunch of distros just to install, test, fdisk, repeat.
> >
> > So I ask. what is a recommended recent distro that works well with Samba
> > 3? Drake? Debian? SuSE? RH9? All answers welcome, with explanations
> > or not.
>
> A particular point to consider is the native support for MIT kerberos
> 1.3.1, or the right Heimdal version.
>
> Fedora Core 1 has this, and I think the latest SUSE does, Debian Testing
> and Debain Unstable do have the right krb5, but naturally Debian Stable
> does not. In particular, note RH9 does NOT, and this can get in your
> way.
>
> Andrew Bartlett
More information about the samba
mailing list