[Samba] Which Linux best suits Samba3?

Tim Jordan timothy_jordan at labor.state.ak.us
Mon Nov 24 21:07:11 GMT 2003


I just tried installing Samba 3 rpm from samba.org on a fedora1 box and
it failed to install"

missing libcom_err.so.3

I take it Fedora is using a different set of libs.  Any advice on how to
resolve this or do I roll back to redhat 8 or 9?

I've been trying and trying to get samba 3 to work with Gentoo....no
joy!

Tim


On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 14:26, Andrew Bartlett wrote:

> On Sat, 2003-11-22 at 05:40, Eric Geater 11/18/03 wrote:
> > In a discussion with one of the main answer people, of whose time I am
> > greatly appreciative, it was suggested that some of my problem (or
> > solution) may be to run Samba on a distro that's better suited for it.
> > Problem is, I don't have the time nor the inclination to download a
> > bunch of distros just to install, test, fdisk, repeat.
> > 
> > So I ask. what is a recommended recent distro that works well with Samba
> > 3?  Drake?  Debian?  SuSE?  RH9?  All answers welcome, with explanations
> > or not.
> 
> A particular point to consider is the native support for MIT kerberos
> 1.3.1, or the right Heimdal version.
> 
> Fedora Core 1 has this, and I think the latest SUSE does, Debian Testing
> and Debain Unstable do have the right krb5, but naturally Debian Stable
> does not. In particular, note RH9 does NOT, and this can get in your
> way.   
> 
> Andrew Bartlett



More information about the samba mailing list