[Samba] windows file compatibility aka A Cry For Help

Chris McKeever cgmckeever at prupref.com
Fri May 9 23:20:16 GMT 2003


ok that worked swell...
but now I have a new issue that arose from all the permission changes.

I have a shared folder that is a sub-folder of another share.  Do I need to
just open the permissions to world readable in order for the sub-folder to
be usable when connected directly

[admin]
        comment = branch administrative share
        path = /samba/admin
        browseable = yes
        public = no
        read only = yes
        valid users = @a-team @m-team @domain-admins
        write list = @a-team @m-team @domain-admins
        oplocks = no
        level2 oplocks = no
        force directory mode = 0770
        create mask = 0771
        force group = a-team

[agent]
        comment = branch file share
        path = /samba/admin/agent-share
        browseable = yes
        public = yes
        read only = no
        oplocks = no
        level2 oplocks = no
        force directory mode = 0770
        create mask = 0771
        force group = domain-users

so basically, if someone creates a file in \\server\agent\agent-share it
will be only accessbile by a-team so if someone connects to \\server\agent
that inst in a-team, they can't do anything with it...

so I guess I need to either break the two apart or just open up world
permissions, or force group to domain-users

or am I missing something here?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris McKeever [mailto:tech-mail at prupref.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 5:31 PM
> To: 'Scott Shackelford'; samba at lists.samba.org
> Subject: RE: [Samba] windows file compatibility aka A Cry For Help
> 
> 
> I think I need to use the map hidden and map archive...so I 
> have to play
> with attributes...
> 
> !!!
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris McKeever 
> > Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 5:01 PM
> > To: Chris McKeever; 'Scott Shackelford'; samba at lists.samba.org
> > Subject: RE: [Samba] windows file compatibility aka A Cry For Help
> > 
> > 
> > I think I have narrowed it down to needing the archive and 
> > hidden bit set..any ideas how to mimic this through a samba share...
> > 
> > thanks!!!
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Chris McKeever [mailto:tech-mail at prupref.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 4:17 PM
> > > To: 'Scott Shackelford'; samba at lists.samba.org
> > > Subject: RE: [Samba] windows file compatibility aka A Cry For Help
> > > 
> > > 
> > > gave it a shot...no go .. will keep toying with it!
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the suggestion
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Scott Shackelford [mailto:scott at customtransport.com]
> > > > Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 4:06 PM
> > > > To: samba at lists.samba.org
> > > > Subject: RE: [Samba] windows file compatibility aka A 
> Cry For Help
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I've seen some older programs not handle Network shares over 
> > > > 2GB. I would
> > > > try to limit the max disk size reported to 2GB.
> > > > 
> > > > In your smb.conf in the [global] section add
> > > > 
> > > > 	max disk size = 2000
> > > > 
> > > > and see if that fixes it. I usually see this on some 
> > > > installers as they
> > > > think that if it's over 2GB or space that it thinks it's 0 
> > > > space free. (Runs
> > > > out of bits.) Hope this helps.
> > > > 
> > > > 	-Scott Shackelford
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: samba-bounces+scott=customtransport.com at lists.samba.org
> > > > > 
> > [mailto:samba-bounces+scott=customtransport.com at lists.samba.org]On
> > > > > Behalf Of Chris McKeever
> > > > > Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 4:38 PM
> > > > > Cc: 'samba at lists.samba.org'
> > > > > Subject: [Samba] windows file compatibility aka A Cry For Help
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Everything is going amazing in the windows->samba 
> > > > conversion until I ran
> > > > > into a roadblock..I really dont know what may be going on so I
> > > > > will outline
> > > > > it as best as I can.
> > > > >
> > > > > We have a program called realty toolkit which saves its 
> > > > configuration and
> > > > > security settings onto the network.  Well, after putting the
> > > > > files onto the
> > > > > linux box, it no loger wants to work, the security 
> check fails.
> > > > >
> > > > > calling the vendor they asked 'is there any compression' 
> > > > because they have
> > > > > seen this behavior with compressed drives, and thier 
> explanation
> > > > > is 'toolkit
> > > > > looks for a specific file geometry and compression throws 
> > > > that off'  -- so
> > > > > my interpretation is that the file has to be written 
> > > > correctly when read
> > > > >
> > > > > I can only guess that samba stores it a bit different, and 
> > > > therefore the
> > > > > geometry is off...
> > > > >
> > > > > Does this make any sense? or is this way off and it is a 
> > > > different problem
> > > > > that can be fixed???
> > > > >
> > > > > Other than that the implementation is running great!
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL 
> > and read the
> > > > > instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL 
> and read the
> > > > instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > > > 
> > > -- 
> > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > > 
> > 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> 


More information about the samba mailing list