[Samba] snprintf, vsnprintf
abartlet at samba.org
Thu Jun 26 06:38:14 GMT 2003
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 10:23, William Jojo wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, William Jojo wrote:
> > anyway the bug i'm tracking is a failure to expand the macros SAFE_FREE
> > and VA_COPY. is compiles fine in AIX 5.1. as soon as i figure that one
> > out, i'll forward it.
> found it. you are penalized in snprintf.c if you have all three of
> HAVE_SNPRINTF, HAVE_VSNPRINTF and HAVE_C99_VSNPRINTF by what i believe is
> an unnecessary else clause. It will include stdio.h, but will not define
> SAFE_FREE and VA_COPY.
> AIX 5.1 does not have vsnprintf so it compiles there.
> I think this is what the change should be - pardon my misuse if diff, i
> would like to know the correct format for submitting patches, but could
> not find it during my short search of the site.
diff -u would make this legible.
Also, what version was this against?
Andrew Bartlett abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20030626/ae90a57e/attachment.bin
More information about the samba