[Samba] Outlook .pst on a samba share; do or don't?
Wolfram Quester
wquester at mittelerde.physik.uni-konstanz.de
Wed Jun 11 14:17:06 GMT 2003
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 04:00:22PM +0200, Vizitiu, Ciprian wrote:
>
> >
> > > I only would like to put into consideration that
> > > I corrupted my outlook.pst file and lost a lot of
> > > messages while I had outlook open and the client lost
> > connection due
> > > to service maintenance on the linux server.
> >
> > Are oplocks turned off? See chapter 14 of the Samba-3 HOWTO
> > collection, "File and Record Locking". Very good reading.
> >
>
> So to sum it up: Outlook .psts on a samba share are ok as long as you don't
> pull the plug (but the electricity company can do that... Not all my WS have
> UPSs) so to be on the safe side disable oplocks. From smb.conf man it looks
> like it can't be done on a per file basis so I'll have to create a separate
> share. Given the sizes (300 to 800MB each, 20 users) will ext3 do or I'll
> have to resort to smth more "exotic" like JVS/RieserFS?
See man smb.conf for the "veto oplock files" parameter:
In my experience ext3 will do. I've read on this list that Reiser and xfs are good
if you have a lot of (small) files to share.
Regards,
Wolfi
More information about the samba
mailing list