[Samba] subshares ?

[ipguy]

i understand.
please read my original question....



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marian Mlcoch, Ing" <mm at tsmp.sk>
To: "ipguy" <ipguy at optushome.com.au>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] subshares ?


> No you not understand priority of permisions on NT and samba is this
> identical but samba without ACL is simples.
>
> Highest priority to acces any file is file permision and owner on linux
> filesystem respect by samba.
> Secondary is directory permision and ownership with parent respect
> structure.
> And last is share definition that set only permision implicit for network.
>
> if share is read only then all under this share is read only used over
this
> share but another share can be write to this or its subdirs.
> else if share is writable then only user with suficient name and group to
> !!share directory!! permision can write to directory structure as is
rename
> delete or create files and subdirs. And only users and groups that have
suff
> permision to exist files can read, execute or change it. This all is
> controlled by filesystem not over samba conf (if you install filesystem
with
> acl then you can set more perms on one file as clasic user-group-other).
>
> Samba conf only control settings perm of new files and dirs created over
> net.
>
> Bye.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "ipguy" <ipguy at optushome.com.au>
> To: "John H Terpstra" <jht at samba.org>
> Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [Samba] subshares ?
>
>
> > so my only option is NT ACL support then...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, ipguy wrote:
> > >
> > > > hi all...
> > > > i have what seems a simple question regarding subshares, for lack of
a
> > better term...
> > > > say i have a share with specific user/group permissions and a
> directory
> > inside the share that i would like to add different user/group
> > permissions...
> > > > this is an example of my smb.conf file to illustrate
> > > >
> > > > [driveA]
> > > > path = /samba/driveA
> > > > browseable = Yes
> > > > writeable = Yes
> > > > valid users = PDC+groupA
> > > > force group = PDC+groupA
> > > >
> > > > [driveB]
> > > > path = /samba/driveA/driveB
> > > > browseable = No
> > > > writeable = Yes
> > > > valid users = PDC+groupB
> > > > force group = PDC+groupB
> > > > inherit permissions = No
> > > >
> > > > shouldn't this restrict groupA users from accessing the subshare
> called
> > > > "driveB" located inside the share "/samba/driveA" ??
> > >
> > > driveB is a directory in /samba/driveA from the perspective of the
> driveA
> > > share. IT is NOT a sub-share, there is no such thing in the SMB/CIFS
> > > protocol specification.
> > >
> > > That means that users of the share called driveA will be able to
access
> > > the contents of the directory driveB as permitted by the permissions
on
> > > the driveBdirectory.
> > >
> > > - John T.
> > > --
> > > John H Terpstra
> > > Email: jht at samba.org
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>