[Samba] affordable "mid-way compromise" with samba 3.x and M$ ADS
server participation ?
Urs Rau
urs.rau at uk.om.org
Fri Jul 11 14:13:40 GMT 2003
Guys,
A simple question from a naive guy ;-). Would it be possible and legal,
in terms of M$ software licensing, to use a w2k or higher (2003?) ms win
active direcotory server as the main active directory server BUT have
all the clients connect to the samba 3.x which runs as a pdc and has
joined the ADS domain?
And IF this is technically possible would this "avoid" having to get any
more licenses than the 5 (is that correct) that come with a fully
licensed basic w2k/2003 server?
In short is there any mileage in this sort of "affordable mid-way
compromise"?
Please don't flame me if this is the silliest question you have ever
come across. ;-) I am only trying to survive in a seemingly more and
more M$ dominated world. BUT am unwilling to fully yield.
Many thanks in advance,
Urs Rau
More information about the samba
mailing list