[Samba] os x and samba performance vs netatalk
Stewart Allen
stewart at neuron.com
Fri Jan 3 21:28:01 GMT 2003
Client:
Dual 1GHz G4 OSX 10.2
Gig-Ethernet
Server:
Dual 2GHz P4 Linux 2.4.18
Raid-5 1TB
Gig-Ethernet
With netatalk 1.5.5 I get sustained writes of 66MB/s (yes, megabytes)
With samba 2.2.7a I get sustained writes of 15MB/s
I've tweaked the settings and ended up with these:
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE
read raw = true
write raw = true
read size = 65535
write size = 65535
write cache size = 262144
But no changes led to any noticeable positive improvements.
So my questions is this: is OS X just a sucky SMB client or is Samba
misconfigured? I would stick with netatalk for performance, but it has a 2GB
file limit which is a deal-breaker for large media files.
thanks,
stewart
More information about the samba
mailing list