[Samba] Win2k and Samba

[Al Bean]

Hi Kurt,


I set "socket options" to the default by removing it and I set case case 
sensitive = No.  But that did not help or change the log output.

I also changed the NICs in both boxes just to see if that was the problem 
but that did not help.

:(

I'm wondering, can sombody tell me how long it should take to transfer a 
10MB file from win2k (1.5GHz Pentium4, 100 BaseT NIC) to a Linux share 
(400MHz Pentium2, 100 BaseT Nic) where the two boxes are connected by a 100 
BaseT switch?

Also, (if possible) could sombody post thier smb.conf where they are using a 
Linux box as a simple file server in a Windows environment (where the linux 
box is NOT a PDC)?
That would really help to see if I'm doing something wrong.

Thanks!






>From: Kurt Weiss <input.maillists at kwnet.at>
>To: Al Bean <albean84 at hotmail.com>
>CC: samba at lists.samba.org
>Subject: Re: [Samba] Win2k and Samba
>Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 08:18:56 +0100
>
>hi again!
>
>Al Bean schrieb:
>
>>
>>The first few entries are on trying to copy a file from win2k to the linux 
>>share.
>>The last few entries are on trying to delete a file on the linux share.
>>
>
>
>>As you can see from the conf file the path to the linux share is "/ark"
>>and I'm copying from the win2k desktop to that linux share so the path is:
>>"C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Desktop\"
>>I know the "/ark" path is not deep and I really don't thing the path to 
>>the desktop is that deep either.
>
>ok - i believe - it's not that i thought ;-)
>
>>---------------------------
>>[2003/02/23 08:45:25, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_data(436)
>>  read_data: read failure for 19168. Error = Connection reset by peer
>>[2003/02/23 08:52:57, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_data(436)
>>  read_data: read failure for 29388. Error = Connection reset by peer
>>[2003/02/23 09:11:06, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_data(436)
>>  read_data: read failure for 49828. Error = Interrupted system call
>>[2003/02/23 09:14:09, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(981)
>>  request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to 
>>pid 968 on port 1029 for dev = 303, inode = 140233, fi
>>le_id = 2
>>[2003/02/23 09:14:41, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(981)
>>  request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to 
>>pid 968 on port 1029 for dev = 303, inode = 140233, fi
>>le_id = 2
>>[2003/02/23 09:15:13, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(981)
>>  request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to 
>>pid 968 on port 1029 for dev = 303, inode = 140233, fi
>>le_id = 2
>
>what's that? - seems, something is running bad in network communication!
>i'm looking for the errno. (436) -stay tuned
>
>>        encrypt passwords = Yes
>>        obey pam restrictions = Yes
> >        pam password change = Yes
>
>man smb.conf:
>"Note that samba always ignores PAM for authentication in case of "encrypt 
>password = yes"
>(samba 2.2.4)
>
>
>>        socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 
>>SO_RCVBUF=8192
>
>only an idea: won't u play with this to see, which effect it has to your 
>error log?
>
>>        local master = No
>>        dns proxy = No
>>        remote announce = 192.168.0.255
>>        remote browse sync = 192.168.0.255
>>        hosts allow = 192.168.0. 127.
>>        case sensitive = Yes
>
>i think, that's dangerous: windows mostly changes case! - try 'no'
>
>
>so i hope it helped
>gk


_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus