[Samba] Foxpro Test
Gerald Drouillard
gerrylist at drouillard.ca
Sat Feb 15 13:47:40 GMT 2003
Have a look at:
http://www.drouillard.ca/Tips&Tricks/Samba/Oplocks.htm
Regards
-------------------------
Gerald Drouillard
Owner and Consultant
Drouillard & Associates, Inc.
http://www.Drouillard.ca
> -----Original Message-----
> From: samba-bounces+gerrylist=drouillard.ca at lists.samba.org
> [mailto:samba-bounces+gerrylist=drouillard.ca at lists.samba.org]On Behalf
> Of lrnobs
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 3:57 PM
> To: samba at lists.samba.org
> Subject: [Samba] Foxpro Test
>
>
> I want to put a Samba server online under RedHat 7.3 to replace
> an old Novell server.
>
> Oplocks is turned off.
>
> I ran a test last night with Visual FoxPro code like this:
>
> **************************************************
> do while not flock() && request a file lock
> && try again
> endo
>
> get the date and time
> insert a record into a shared table
> unlock
>
> start over again
> ***************************************************
>
> I ran this on seven windows pcs simultaneously.
>
> 1. The record insertions would allow one pc to insert multiple
> records, for example 10 in a row before another computer had a
> chance to do an insertion. The same test on the Novell server
> would allow one or two records before it gave another computer a
> chance for an insertion.
>
> 2. After several thousand insertions I had only one pc consuming
> the time viewable with the top command. I killed that process
> but the other pcs still were not doing insertions. I killed the
> process on a second pc and then the rest were free to insert records.
>
> How can I make the Samba server distribute time more evenly. I
> suspect that allowing one pc so much record insertion time to the
> exclusion of others created my lock up.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Larry Nobs
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
More information about the samba
mailing list