[Samba] Re: Can't see all of the directories in a share with 2.2.7a-1
& RH8...but older version/kernel can
Chris de Vidal
cdevidal at yahoo.com
Mon Feb 3 23:24:30 GMT 2003
--- Joe Gerkman <joe.gerkman at gartner.com> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Did the checks you recommended (which are some of
> the ones I always do
> when troubleshooting too, but definitely something
> to keep in mind).
>
> -No changes from default (including binaries/conf
> files)...no corrupt
> files/libraries from what I can tell.
> -Tried forced reinstall of Samba 2.2.7a ...no luck
> -Same directories are missing from the listing on
> all 2.2.7a/RH8 hosts
> (they're all consistent)...only the RH6.2/2.0.6-9
> can sreinstallingee
> the full list
>
> Hate to say this, but I ended up using sharity-light
> just to try it and
> it worked, so that's what I'm using until I can
> figure out why this
> seems to only affect our RedHat 8.0/2.2.7a clients.
And 7.x clients, right? I'd like to hear from you
when/if you install RedHat 8.1+ or another distro.
Could you send me a testparm output offlist?
/dev/idal
> If anyone finds anything out that sounds similar,
> please let me
> know....as I'd really like to go back to using
> smbmount/Samba.
>
> Thanks again...and take care,
>
> -J
>
>
> On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 13:35, Chris de Vidal wrote:
> > --- Joe Gerkman <joe.gerkman at gartner.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 07:47, Chris de Vidal
> wrote:
> > > > Update:
> > > > From a RedHat 8 box with Samba 2.2.7a from a
> > > Samba.org
> > > > RPM, I could see 1000 directories on a Windows
> > > 2000
> > > > Pro share.
> > > >
> > > > From a RedHat 7.3 box with Samba 2.2.7a from a
> > > > Samba.org SRPM tweaked to include ACL support,
> I
> > > could
> > > > see 1000 directories on a Windows 2000 Pro
> share.
> > > >
> > > > I created them with a for loop from my
> smbmount,
> > > not
> > > > from within Windows, in case it matters.
> > >
> > > I figured it wasn't a directory/file number
> > > limitation, but wasn't
> > > entirely sure...I guess this confirms it...just
> as a
> > > check, were there
> > > any particularly large files/directories in
> there?
> > > I know that we have
> > > some directories that can get as big a 8 GB in
> > > size...just not sure if
> > > size plays into this at all either...
> >
> > This is what I did from the RH 8 box:
> > for ((i=1;i<=1000;i++)); do mkdir $i; done
> > ls | wc -l
> > 1000
> >
> > At your question, I made a 2GB file in 10
> directories
> > (I couldn't create a 10GB file.. a Windows
> problem?):
> > for ((i=1;i<=10;i++)); do dd if=/dev/zero
> of=$i/2GB
> > bs=1M count=2000; done
> > ls | wc -l
> > 1000
> >
> > I can't explain it. Perhaps some weird/corrupt
> binary
> > or library? Try
> > rpm -Va | grep '^..5' | grep -v ' c ' | less
> > which will show every non-config file that has
> been
> > modified since being installed from its original
> RPM.
> > Look at libraries and binaries in particular.
> >
> > Reinstall a damaged RPM with
> > rpm -Uvh --replacepkgs --force some_package.rpm
> > paying special attention to any .rpmsave/orig/new
> > files created, which might move an original conf
> file
> > (so diff the *.rpmorig/save/new with the existing
> > file).
> >
> > Also, ensure you are seeing the exact same files
> > missing each time:
> > ls > missing_at_12-24pm.txt
> > <later, after umounting/remounting>
> > ls > missing_at_2-56pm.txt
> > diff missing_at_12-24pm.txt missing_at_2-56pm.txt
> > Any differences might tell me to look at
> intermittent
> > network connectivity... it's yet another shot in
> the
> > dark.
> >
> > Sorry I could not offer more specific help; these
> are
> > the troubleshooting steps I go through when
> looking at
> > weird problems like these.
> >
> > > > Someone shared that the permissions were
> possibly
> > > > incorrect, but that would only seem to apply
> to a
> > > > Samba server, not smbmount. And you're not
> using
> > > a
> > > > umask, so the default umask is the one from
> the
> > > > system, which is 0022, making permissions for
> > > folders
> > > > and files 755.
> > > >
> > > > The only thing I can offer now is possibly
> > > ensuring
> > > > that the username you access from the 6.2 box
> is
> > > the
> > > > same you use on the 7.x+ boxen. If the
> usernames
> > > were
> > > > different, perhaps permissions on Windows hide
> > > those
> > > > directories from view (but obviously not from
> cd).
> > >
> > > Yep...same id...same password.
> > >
> > > > Oh, and check the DOS permissions on those
> > > > directories.. make sure they're not hidden. I
> > > don't
> > > > know if smbmount obeys that, but it's worth a
> > > shot.
> > >
> > > I'll double-check that and let you know...but as
> > > most of the directories
> > > are created by a script (on the windows side),
> and
> > > there haven't been
> > > any changes to the script, they *should* all be
> the
> > > same...but again,
> > > I'll confirm that.
> > >
> > > > /dev/idal
> > > >
> > > Thanks again Chris...
> > >
> > > -Joe
> > >
> > > > --- Chris de Vidal <cdevidal at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > To the list: We've been having some off-list
> > > > > conversation and I wanted to clue you in
> here.
> > > Our
> > > > > thread might be useful for posterity's
> > > (Google's?)
> > > > > sake.
> > > > >
> > > > > /dev/idal
> > > > >
> > > > > --- Joe Gerkman <joe.gerkman at gartner.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > We're using the following command (from a
> > > shell
> > > > > > script):
> > > > >
> > > > > First (this isn't your fix but a nicety),
> it's
> > > > > easier
> > > > > when this is in /etc/fstab instead of with a
> > > script.
> > > > >
> > > > > It can be done automatically at boot (RedHat
> > > > > recognizes smbfs types and waits til network
> is
> > > > > started) or manually with the noauto option.
>
> > > Then,
> > > > > you can just run
> > > > > mount /blahblah/Data
> > > > >
> > > > > If you put your password in a credentials
> file
> > > (see
> > > > > below), you can protect your password.
> > > > >
> > > > > Again, not a fix for your issue but I
> thought
> > > you'd
> > > > > like to know that.
> > > > >
> > > > > > mount -f -t smbfs -o
> > > > >
> > > > > Second, I had to look up -f. man mount:
> > > > > -f Causes everything to be done except
> for
> > > the
> > > > > actual system call; if it's not obvious,
> this
> > > > > ``fakes'' mount-ing the file system.
> This
> > > option
> > > > > is useful in conjunction with the -v flag to
> > > > > determine
> > > > > what the mount command is trying to do. It
> can
> > > also
> > > > > be
> > > > > used to add entries for devices that were
> > > mounted
> > > > > earlier with the -n option.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have little confidence this will fix your
> > > problem,
> > > > > but please try it without that flag anyway.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's just a shot in the dark...
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
username=xxxxxxx,password=xxxxxxx,uid=xxx,gid=xxxxxxxxx,fmask=770,dmask=770
> > > > > > //blahblah/Data /blahblah/Data
> > > > >
> > > > > Another nicety; use this option with mount
> or in
> > > > > your
> > > > > fstab:
> > > > >
> credentials=/some/file/chown/root.root/chmod/600
> > > > > with
> > > > > username = someuser
> > > > > password = somepassword
> > > > > inside that file. I like to put mine in
> > > > > /etc/smb_passwd and I run chown 0.0/chmod
> 600
> > > > > against
> > > > > it.
> > > > >
> > > > > This lets you avoid putting the password in
> the
> > > > > (world-readable) fstab. Just a suggestion.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Same command we've been using for a while
> now
> > > (>1
> > > > > > year)...but then
> > > > > > again, maybe one of the options could have
> > > been
> > > > > > deprecated????
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Also, we installed Samba via the RPMs from
> > > > > > samba.org...but I've also
> > > > > > tried building from source (both SRPMs and
> > > plain
> > > > > > source)...neither
> > > > > > changed anything...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks again for your help Chris....
> > > > >
> > > > > Don't thank me until I can confirm or deny
> it
> > > from a
> > > > > RH 7.3 and 8.0 box to an NT and 2000 Pro (no
> > > > > Server/Advanced) share (:
> > > > >
> > > > > /dev/idal
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 17:45, Chris de
> Vidal
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Whoa, really strange. Might be
> something
> > > you're
> > > > > > > doing, but I'll post my results to you
> and
> > > the
> > > > > > list
> > > > > > > tomorrow and we can see if it's a
> consistent
> > > > > > problem
> > > > > > > with RedHat 7+ and 2000.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You are using smbmount or mount smbfs in
> > > fstab,
> > > > > > > correct?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Also, how did you install Samba? I got
> an
> > > RPM
> > > > > > from
> > > > > > > Samba.org (well, an SRPM so I could
> tweak
> > > the
> > > > > > > ./configure line).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > /dev/idal
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- Joe Gerkman
> <joe.gerkman at gartner.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > Update...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > See 554 files on rh8.0/2.2.7a machine,
> 627
> > > on
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > rh6.2/2.0.6-9 machine
> > > > > > > > (the latter being the true number).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Tried copying over the same smb.conf
> file
> > > > > (which
> > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > thought I'd done
> > > > > > > > before)...no change/luck. Also tried
> the
> > > same
> > > > > > > > version of samba on a 7.3
> > > > > > > > as well as a 7.1 box (same smb.conf
> file
> > > > > > too)...no
> > > > > > > > luck there
> > > > > > > > either...oh, all had 2.4.x kernel,
> well
> > > except
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > the working machine
> > > > > > > > (if that matters).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 14:05, Chris de
> > > Vidal
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > You're using smbmount, right?
> Sounds
> > > like
> > > > > > you're
> > > > > > > > > seeing only 512 files.. do ls | wc
> -l.
> > > 512
> > > > > is
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > nice
> > > > > > > > > round binary number and is probably
> what
> > > > > > you're
> > > > > > > > > seeing.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I don't have a direct answer, but
> I'm
> > > under
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > impression that there are many
> broken
> > > things
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > RedHat
> > > > > > > > > 8.0 (RedHat 7.0 also had many broken
> > > > > things..
> > > > > > > > > cooincidence??). I wrote earlier
> this
> > > week
> > > > > > about
> > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > RedHat 8-specific problem "cannot
> find
> > > name
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > group
> > > > > > > > > ID XXXXX". Others with RedHat 8
> have
> > > shared
> > > > > > > > similar
> > > > > > > > > stories, and I'm having no issues
> with
> > > the
> > > > > > same
> > > > > > > > exact
> > > > > > > > > version of Samba on a RedHat 7.3
> box.
> > > I've
> > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > using
> > > > > > > > > RH8 on my main workstation since
> > > > > introduction
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > I've
> > > > > > > > > found other weirdness.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm not near my RH8 box at the
> moment
> > > but
> > > > > when
> > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > get
> > > > > > > > > back to work tomorrow I'll test an
> SMB
> > > mount
> > > > > > of a
> > > > > > > > > Windows NT box. I could try a 2000
> box
> > > if
> > > > > > > > necessary.
> > > > > > > > > I'll do a wc -l and see what
> happens. I
> > > do
> > > > > > recall
> > > > > > > > > having no problems with a Samba
> server
> > > > > (2000+
> > > > > > > > > directories) and I can confirm that
> > > > > tomorrow.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > First, try copying the smb.conf from
> the
> > > 6.2
> > > > > > box.
> > > > > > > > > Smbmount seems to read a few lines
> from
> > > it,
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > > is a chance you have differences.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > If you have a RedHat 7.3 box handy,
> > > install
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > same
> > > > > > > > > version of Samba (I agree it doesn't
> > > sound
> > > > > > > > > version-specific) and try it.. it'd
> > > probably
> > > > > > work
> > > > > > > > > fine. I'll try to do the same.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > /dev/idal
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- Joe Gerkman
> > > <joe.gerkman at gartner.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hoping someone might be able to
> steer
> > > me
> > > > > in
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > right direction and/or
> > > > > > > > > > help me solve my problem.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > We have a number of Linux servers
> > > (RH6.2
> > > > > ->
> > > > > > RH8)
> > > > > > > > > > which connect to the
> > > > > > > > > > same share on a Win2000 Server.
> We've
> > > > > been
> > > > > > > > working
> > > > > > > > > > kinda hard to get
> > > > > > > > > > everything upgraded to either
> RH7.3 or
> > > > > RH8.0
> > > > > > > > since
> > > > > > > > > > we rarely get the
> > > > > > > > > > opportunity. 2 similar servers
> (one
> > > dev,
> > > > > > one
> > > > > > > > prod)
> > > > > > > > > > access this same
> > > > > > > > > > window share, which has a large
> number
> > > of
> > > > > > > > > > directories (about 620-650),
> > > > > > > > > > and the share itself is for a
> 180GB
> > > > > volume.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Just recently we discovered that
> our
> > > dev
> > > > > > server
> > > > > > > > > > (RH6.2/2.2.14-5.0 with
> > > > > > > > > > samba 2.0.6-9) can see all of the
> > > > > > > > directories/files
> > > > > > > > > > at the root of this
> > > > > > > > > > share, but the prod server
> > > > > > (RH8.0/2.4.18-19.8.0
> > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > samba 2.2.x ->
> > > > > > > > > > 2.2.7a-1) can not, it can however
> see
> > > a
> > > > > good
> > > > > > > > portion
> > > > > > > > > > of them (about
> > > > > > > > > > 554).
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > There doesn't seem to be anything
> in
> > > > > common
> > > > > > > > about
> > > > > > > > > > these "missing"
> > > > > > > > > > directories...have checked time,
> size,
> > > > > > > > etc...nada in
> > > > > > > > > > common that we can
> > > > > > > > > > determine. We did try quite a few
> > > crazy
> > > > > > things,
> > > > > > > > > > like deleting a few
> > > > > > > > > > directories to see if we saw more,
> but
> > > > > nope.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > And I
> > > > > > > > > > should note that the
> > > > > > > > > > directories are there, you just
> can't
> > > see
> > > > > > > > them...I
> > > > > > > > > > can 'cd' into them
> > > > > > > > > > with no problem.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Oh, and I've tried going back to
> the
> > > > > earlier
> > > > > > > > version
> > > > > > > > > > of samba (same as
> > > > > > > > > > on the dev machine - 2.0.6-9), but
> no
> > > > > luck.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Any ideas? Anyone? Please...
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > -J
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go
> to
> > > the
> > > > > > > > following
> > > > > > > > > > URL and read the
> > > > > > > > > > instructions:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful.
> Affordable.
> > > > > Sign
> > > > > > up
> > > > > > > > now.
> > > > > > > > > http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Joe Gerkman
> > > > > > > > UNIX/Linux Systems Engineer
> > > > > > > > Gartner
> > > > > > > > 308 SW First Avenue
> > > > > > > > Portland, OR 97204
> > > > > > > > phone: 503-241-8036 x427
> > > > > > > > fax: 503-241-8716
> > > > > > > > pager: 800-217-4529 -or-
> > > > > 8002174529 at skytel.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > > > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable.
> > > Sign up
> > > > > > now.
> > > > > > > http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Joe Gerkman
> > > > > > UNIX/Linux Systems Engineer
> > > > > > Gartner
> > > > > > 308 SW First Avenue
> > > > > > Portland, OR 97204
> > > > > > phone: 503-241-8036 x427
> > > > > > fax: 503-241-8716
> > > > > > pager: 800-217-4529 -or-
> > > 8002174529 at skytel.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable.
> Sign up
> > > > > now.
> > > > > http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the
> > > following
> > > > > URL and read the
> > > > > instructions:
> > > > http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign
> up
> > > now.
> > > > http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> > > --
> > > Joe Gerkman
> > > UNIX/Linux Systems Engineer
> > > Gartner
> > > 308 SW First Avenue
> > > Portland, OR 97204
> > > phone: 503-241-8036 x427
> > > fax: 503-241-8716
> > > pager: 800-217-4529 -or- 8002174529 at skytel.com
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the
> following
> > > URL and read the
> > > instructions:
> > http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up
> now.
> > http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> --
> Joe Gerkman
> UNIX/Linux Systems Engineer
> Gartner
> 308 SW First Avenue
> Portland, OR 97204
> phone: 503-241-8036 x427
> fax: 503-241-8716
> pager: 800-217-4529 -or- 8002174529 at skytel.com
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
More information about the samba
mailing list