Fwd: Re: [Samba] fcntl lock failed at large offset: pretty urgent

Thomas Bork knuffelmail at gmx.de
Wed Dec 3 14:50:06 GMT 2003

--- Weitergeleitete Nachricht / Forwarded Message ---
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 15:48:13 +0100 (MET)
From: "Thomas Bork" <knuffelmail at gmx.de>
To: Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>
Subject: Re: [Samba] fcntl lock failed at large offset: pretty urgent

Hi Jeremy,

> > More info of setup: 
> > The version of Samba I have is a precompiled Debian package, and
> > downloaded from the site referred to by www.samba.org
> > 
> > 
> > I'm not sure what the build options were for this, but I will try and
> > find out.
> Running smbd -d10 will cause smbd to write build info into log.smb
> > When you say Samba can be configured to use 64 bit filesystems, is this
> > a compile time option?  Is there a way of checking if the version I have
> > has this enabled?  Perhaps I should build from source.
> It's checked for at compile time. You need to be looking for 
> something like HAVE_STRUCT_FLOCK64 which is what we use for
> 64 bit locking.
> > The setup is:
> >   Linux samba 3.0.0 server, serving files from local disk
> >   Win95,98,xp-pro clients mounting smb shares as a workgroup
> >   Windows software that wants to set a lock at 2^32-16
> What filesystem on the local disk ? Do you have a debug level 10
> of the problem ? Have you tried any of the 3.0.1pre releases
> (although I don't remember changes in this area).

I saw this Problem also with Samba 2.2.7(?) compiled on a SuSE system
running on the system of www.eisfair.org. I had to compile samba direct on
eisfair system to eleminate this error.
Is there any chance to negotiate nessesary parameters at running time and
not at compile time?

der tom

More information about the samba mailing list