No subject

Mon Dec 1 12:27:21 GMT 2003

with samba WITHOUT using winbind. Sorry, but this is not acceptible for 
me (and for sure quite a few other people).

If it is by design that winbind does the lookup of sids and if it is 
also by design that winbind is the final authority on uids, then the 
design is not the best. I would prefer to have two separate instances 
for resolving sids to names and for resolving names to uids. The way 
you have implemented it so far forces users to quit their nameservice 
and use the M$ one.

Am I right?


More information about the samba mailing list