No subject
Mon Dec 1 11:34:25 GMT 2003
for this process is "root", that is correct. The PID 7247 is one of the
users, but the UID shouldn't be "root" and should be the username that was
authenticated during logon.
Anyone have same or similar problem? and how do I prevent this problem
from happening again? I would appreciate any help.
Thanks.
Will Sun
wsun at jpl.nasa.gov
(818) 354-2311
Return-Path: <lobo at mental.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from gate.mental.com (gate.mental.com [192.31.14.2]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD43459D8; Fri, 24 Aug 2001
12:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp at localhost) by gate.mental.com
(8.8.5/8.8.8/Lobo-20010816) id VAA26589; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 21:59:27
+0200 (CEST)
Received: from twen-et(172.16.0.5) by gate via smap (V2.0/Lobo-010123)
id xma026587; Fri, 24 Aug 01 21:59:23 +0200
Received: (from smap at localhost) by mental.com
(8.11.6/8.11.6/Lobo-20010816) id f7OJxM005389; Fri, 24 Aug 2001
21:59:22 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from twen(172.17.0.5) by twen via smap (V2.0) id xma005384;
Fri, 24 Aug 01 21:59:16 +0200
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
To: Bruce Ferrell <bferrell at microdisplay.com>
Cc: samba <samba at lists.samba.org>, "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)"
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC?
In-reply-to: Bruce Ferrell's message of Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:21:10 PDT
<3B868D06.D7DBD205 at microdisplay.com>
Organization: mental images GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin, Germany
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 21:59:16 +0200
Message-ID: <5383.998683156 at mental.com>
From: Alexander Lobodzinski <lobo at mental.com>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
() Does anybody know what effect changing the IP of a PDC is?
()
() I started out with a 2.2.1a on my Linux PDC. I then added and interface
() alias, eth0:1. Within about an hour my NT4.0SP6a systems stopped being
() able to login. Userlists for shares became unstable. I've put
() everything back the way it was and now I'm basicly waiting for things to
() re-stabilize.
()
() ANy thoughts, anybody?
Well, I'd recommend adding a virtual interface for exclusive use
by the PDC. Use the "interfaces" and "bind interfaces only"
directives to make sure it uses only this interface. (If you
want to use the machine as Samba file server as well, set up
another nmbd/smbd in a different directory tree using the same
directives, but bound to another IP address, maybe the physical
one.)
Supposed you mirror the PDC's Samba directory tree to a backup
PDC machine (rsync or whatever), you can make that one take
over as PDC by simply adding the interface alias and firing up
nmbd/smbd on the PDC configuration mirror.
Ciao, Lobo
Return-Path: <bferrell at microdisplay.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from sartre.microdisplay.com (sartre.microdisplay.com
[207.104.26.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BB85B5B;
Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from romulus.microdisplay.com
(IDENT:root at romulus.microdisplay.com [207.214.198.163]) by
sartre.microdisplay.com (8.11.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f7OKgjO09273;
Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:42:45 -0700
Received: from microdisplay.com (IDENT:bferrell at furby.microdisplay.com
[207.214.198.190]) by romulus.microdisplay.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with
ESMTP id NAA32083; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:42:45 -0700
Message-ID: <3B86BC44.9A926973 at microdisplay.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:42:44 -0700
From: Bruce Ferrell <bferrell at microdisplay.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
Cc: "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC?
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0108241432030.12177-100000 at tennyson.netexpres
s.net> <01b601c12cd5$a978b180$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I hope some/any of the developers is listening...
Is it fairly safe to say that the IP address(es) used in no way effect the RID
or SID?
BTW, now that I've nailed my PDC back to it's original IP, things seem to be
settleing in again.
Adam Lang wrote:
> That's probably the clincher. Like I said earlier, I wouldn't be surprised
> if clients were freaking out because they are sending/receiving packets from
> different IPs.
>
> VP of Color LaserJet Printing
> and also Systems Engineer
> Adam Lang
> Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
> www.rutgersinurance.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Langasek" <vorlon at netexpress.net>
> To: "Jorge Sarmiento" <jsarmiento at ccom.org>
> Cc: "Bruce Ferrell" <bferrell at microdisplay.com>; "Simo Sorce"
> <idra at samba.org>; "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org>; "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)"
> <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 3:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC?
>
> > On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Jorge Sarmiento wrote:
> > Hmm, I have a Samba PDC that has 47 IP addresses on a single ethernet
> card.
> > Zero problems, so long as you have an 'interfaces' line and specify 'bind
> > interfaces only = yes'.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <vorlon at netexpress.net>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from tennyson.netexpress.net (tennyson.netexpress.net
[64.22.192.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42086454F;
Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (vorlon at localhost) by tennyson.netexpress.net
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA12981; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:50:24 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: tennyson.netexpress.net: vorlon owned process
doing -bs
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:50:23 -0500 (CDT)
From: Steve Langasek <vorlon at netexpress.net>
To: Bruce Ferrell <bferrell at microdisplay.com>
Cc: samba <samba at lists.samba.org>, "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)"
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC?
In-Reply-To: <3B86BC44.9A926973 at microdisplay.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0108241547150.12177-100000 at tennyson.netexpres
s.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Bruce Ferrell wrote:
> I hope some/any of the developers is listening...
> Is it fairly safe to say that the IP address(es) used in no way effect the RID
> or SID?
It is safe to say, yes. The only issues are with clients being confused by
packets coming back from the 'wrong' IP, and with multiple, possibly
conflicting WINS entries (or responses to broadcast queries) breaking lookups.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
Return-Path: <kourosh at loop.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from atlanticpearl.com (unknown [64.63.42.245]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 143635965 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 31169 invoked by uid 517); 24 Aug 2001 20:56:38 -0000
Received: from kourosh at loop.com by hera.atlanticpearl.com with
qmail-scanner-0.96 (uvscan: v4.1.40/v4155. . Clean. Processed in
0.332326 secs); 24 Aug 2001 20:56:38 -0000
Received: from (HELO ryoko.loop.com) () by hera.atlanticpearl.com with
SMTP; 24 Aug 2001 20:56:38 -0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010824135034.00aaf748 at pop.loop.com>
X-Sender: kourosh at pop.loop.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:53:24 -0700
To: Bruce Ferrell <bferrell at microdisplay.com>, samba at lists.samba.org
From: Kourosh Ghassemieh <kourosh at loop.com>
Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC?
In-Reply-To: <3B869E48.713850BB at microdisplay.com>
References: <3B868D06.D7DBD205 at microdisplay.com>
<00e501c12cc6$046a32e0$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
WINS may be the problem. There may be a stale
entry in the WINS db pinting to the old address.
Try flushing that WINS server and see if it helps.
At 11:34 AM 8/24/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>No DHCP used here at all and WINS is on another system.
>
>Adam Lang wrote:
>
> > Are there other things that are on that server? DHCP? WINS? Windows
> > clients freak out if the DHCP server address changes on it.
> >
> > VP of Color LaserJet Printing
> > and also Systems Engineer
> > Adam Lang
> > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
> > www.rutgersinurance.com
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bruce Ferrell" <bferrell at microdisplay.com>
> > To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org>; "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)"
> > <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
> > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 1:21 PM
> > Subject: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC?
> >
> > > Does anybody know what effect changing the IP of a PDC is?
> > >
> > > I'm working on fault tolerence using heatbeat from linux-ha.org and
> > > I think I've stumbled on something.
> > >
> > > I started out with a 2.2.1a on my Linux PDC. I then added and interface
> > > alias, eth0:1. Within about an hour my NT4.0SP6a systems stopped being
> > > able to login. Userlists for shares became unstable. I've put
> > > everything back the way it was and now I'm basicly waiting for things to
> > > re-stabilize.
> > >
> > > ANy thoughts, anybody?
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kourosh Ghassemieh
MindWare Information Systems & Technologies
9255 Sunset Blvd, Penthouse
West Hollywood CA 90069
(310) 729-1784
kourosh at loop.com
++++Networking Solutions for Your Business++++
Return-Path: <jamie at listserv.newberg.k12.or.us>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from listserv.newberg.k12.or.us (listserv.newberg.k12.or.us
[198.236.226.5]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2154173
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.16.25] ([172.16.16.25]) by
listserv.newberg.k12.or.us (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f7OLoir10101
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:50:44 -0700
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/9.0.2509
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:51:01 -0700
Subject: Just a question
From: jamie <jamie at listserv.newberg.k12.or.us>
To: samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
Message-ID: <B7AC1A55.45AE%jamie at listserv.newberg.k12.or.us>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
What happens if you have 2 machines running as a wins server on the same
subnet? Or 2 machines running as the master browser?
-Thanks
Jamie
Return-Path: <jamie at listserv.newberg.k12.or.us>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from listserv.newberg.k12.or.us (listserv.newberg.k12.or.us
[198.236.226.5]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 367544414
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:09:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.16.25] ([172.16.16.25]) by
listserv.newberg.k12.or.us (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f7OMCor10358
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:12:50 -0700
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/9.0.2509
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:13:08 -0700
Subject: RE: Just a question.
From: jamie <jamie at listserv.newberg.k12.or.us>
To: samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
Message-ID: <B7AC1F84.45B7%jamie at listserv.newberg.k12.or.us>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Sorry reading the samba man page answered my questions.
Thanks
Jamie
Return-Path: <matt7595 at cs.uidaho.edu>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from dworshak.cs.uidaho.edu (dworshak.cs.uidaho.edu
[129.101.153.122]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
576EC4539 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:21:09 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from brownlee.cs.uidaho.edu (IDENT:josh at brownlee.cs.uidaho.edu
[129.101.153.33]) by dworshak.cs.uidaho.edu (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3)
with ESMTP id PAA14756 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001
15:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: using samba 2.2.1a as w2k homedir server, not PDC
From: Josh Mattoon <matt7595 at cs.uidaho.edu>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12 (Preview Release)
Date: 24 Aug 2001 15:24:29 -0700
Message-Id: <998691870.20291.4.camel at brownlee.cs.uidaho.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi all,
This is my first post to this list... it may get a little long but i'd
suppose the more info the better...
I've got samba 2.2 set up quite well on a valinux6.2 machine. (redhat6.2
with some va mods). I'm using domain security that authenticates
through a win2k domain server. This works just fine. I can mount the
shares and everything. On the linux side the users exist in the
password file through nis (+::::::/bin/false). The users are pretty
much 1/1 mapping with NT except for a few special NT related things that
don't matter... At present, I'm using the samba server to share out
automounted HP/UX 10.20 homedirs to W2k clients. This also works fine.
I was a happy camper up until about a week ago.
Here's the problem:
Our W2k servers are out of space for home dirs and my boss wants me to
move the homes to my new 100 gig raid linux server. We will still use
the W2k for authentication of the domain (my boss really want's to have
BDC support, somthing samba just doesn't have at this point). No
problem, I thought. I went to the PDC and changed the location of my
profile and home to the samba server. I created the directory and
copied over my stuff from W2k. So, I've been testing this out and for
the life of me I can't make it work on Win2k. When I logon to it a box
pops up and says "Cannot copy file \\sambaserver\share\profile\somefile
to C:\\documents and settings\username\somefile. Access is denied.
Contact your Admin" Wait, that's me... hah. After that another window
pops up saying "Can't download profile, using temp one instead" I'm
pretty sure this only happens once you logon once. At any rate it does
copy the file over and the file sits there in a folder called
username.bak and i can't delete it, even as administrator. It says
"File may be in use" even though they obviously aren't. I check out the
permisions and they are owned by \sambaserver\user rather than
\domain\user. I think this may be the problem. I tried to take
ownership but i get an error saying "File security descriptor structure
is invalid" or something to that effect. So now I'm stuck with some
files i can't force W2k to delete and nothing works. It does, however,
mount my homedirectory from the samba server and that works just fine.
I got so frustrated that i found an old NT4 box and tried it. It worked
perfectly!!! Is there some sort of crazy new "security descriptor
structure" in NTFS5 that NTFS4 doesn't have?
Does anyone know what's going on here? I've hit google harder than I
ever have in my life and I'm still stumped.
Thanks,
Josh
Return-Path: <mrzasa at fciconnect.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from exmn.tric.am.fciconnect.com (unknown [206.57.126.52]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1CB4636 for
<samba at samba.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by exmn with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id
<RDNM3NTZ>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 18:29:50 -0400
Message-ID: <FFB68F4697B47F4BA4E93A81008179CA0110A3A1 at exmn>
From: "Rzasa, Mike" <mrzasa at fciconnect.com>
To: "'samba at samba.org'" <samba at samba.org>
Subject: netbios name not recognized
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 18:29:48 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
First off let me apoligize if this is not the way to alert of an issue.
The problem that I am currently having relates to the netbios name not
registering within the network. So the samba client machine can be found by
IP address and not by host (netbios) name.
Any thoughts?
Return-Path: <jeff at estateplanutah.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.onenetwork.com (user-7.onenetcoloc.fiber.net
[216.83.146.7]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D7943FD
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.onenetwork.com from localhost (router,SLMail V4.1);
Fri, 24 Aug 2001 17:39:06 -0600 for <samba at lists.samba.org>
Received: from PC3 [209.90.86.57] by mail.onenetwork.com [216.83.146.7]
(SLmail 4.1.3395) with SMTP id D21D0BF6963511D5936500A0CC572CC4 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 17:39:05 -0600
Message-ID: <009401c12cf3$280cff20$5a90a8c0 at onenetwork>
Reply-To: "Jeff Skoubye" <jeff at estateplanutah.com>
From: "Jeff Skoubye" <jeff at estateplanutah.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Not Listening for Calling Name
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 17:18:59 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-SLUIDL: 3D60848A-98E311D5-936500A0-CC572CC4
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
The following is what is currently happening with samba on my new linuxbox.
I am trying to test by using the local smbclient. But it responds (not
listening for calling name). Any sugestions? I saw an email with the same
issue in the January Archives. The problem there seemed to be another service
that was answering instead of Samba. How do I find out what service is
interfering? Is there an upgrade package for linux-mandrake to the newest
version of Samba? I am running Samba version 2.0.7. Thanks for any advice
you might have.
[root at pc1 /root]# smbclient //pc1/files -d 4
added interface ip=192.168.144.91 bcast=192.168.144.95 nmask=255.255.255.248
Client started (version 2.0.10).
resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name pc1<0x20>
getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 127.0.0.1 localhost
getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 192.168.144.91 pc1
Connecting to 192.168.144.91 at port 139
session request to PC1 failed (Not listening for calling name)
resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name pc1<0x20>
getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 127.0.0.1 localhost
getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 192.168.144.91 pc1
Connecting to 192.168.144.91 at port 139
session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Not listening for calling name)
[root at pc1 /root]#
Jeff Skoubye
jeff at estateplanutah.com
Return-Path: <jhllwy at yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from web14507.mail.yahoo.com (web14507.mail.yahoo.com
[216.136.224.70]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4941E44F2
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20010824232138.50288.qmail at web14507.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [32.97.136.235] by web14507.mail.yahoo.com; Fri, 24 Aug
2001 16:21:38 PDT
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Julie Holloway <jhllwy at yahoo.com>
Subject: Server string being updated in Network Neighborhood when there
is a conflict
To: samba at lists.samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I apologize if this has been discussed before. I
tried to browse the mail list, but did not find this
topic.
We were testing error scenarios and saw something
interesting. We had configured an NT4 client with the
netbios name of "Flounder". Flounder was listed in
all the browse lists in the workgroup. We then
brought in a Samba server which we also named
"Flounder" with the server string set to "A Samba
2.2.1 Server". We can see that the broadcast name
registration packets are replied to with the expected
error code. What we did not expect to see was that
the comment line in the network neighborhood changed
to "A Samba 2.2.1 Server". We still get to the NT4
client when we choose that name, but the comment is no
longer accurate.
My thinking is that this is something outside of
Samba's control (Samba is NOT the LMB). I would think
it would be the LMB's job to police the list. Am I right?
=====
Julie Holloway
113 Trailing Oak
Cary, NC 27513
(919) 467 - 1470
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
Return-Path: <jlh at cc846558-a.twsn1.md.home.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from cc846558-a.twsn1.md.home.com
(cc846558-a.twsn1.md.home.com [24.182.146.18]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 940AF4243 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 24
Aug 2001 19:33:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from jlh at localhost) by cc846558-a.twsn1.md.home.com
(8.9.1a/8.9.1) id WAA24605; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 22:36:47 -0400
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 22:36:47 -0400
From: Joel Hammer <Joel at HammersHome.com>
To: Jamie Gertsch <JamieGertsch at Freightliner.com>, samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Lexmark driver configuration for SAMBA print server?
Message-ID: <20010824223647.A24500 at hammershome.com>
References: <FCE23CF58EDED41180670004120237E904C1646C at corpexc4.freightli
ner.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <FCE23CF58EDED41180670004120237E904C1646C at corpexc4.freightl
i ner.com>; from JamieGertsch at Freightliner.com on Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at
11:13:57AM -0700
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I get the impression that you are not too experienced with this stuff. So, I
will be garrulous.
It seems odd that they would configure your server to print locally with
samba. That doesn't make much sense to me. I would try to set up a raw print queue
on your linux server in printcap to dump your prefiltered jobs from windows
clients directly to the printer, which will be delivered to your linux
server by samba.
Now, for those drivers.
I would first try installing the drivers locally on a windows client using
the appropriate windows drivers. I would direct these print jobs to your
linux client to a "raw" print queue, ie, one that does no filtering, just
dumps the file to the printer.
If that works, I would then read the instructions that come with samba for
installing the windows printer drivers on the linux server. These
instructions are in a document called: PRINTER_DRIVER.txt in the textdocs
section of your samba distribution. I find these instructions confusing but
just follow the slavishly and you should be ok.
I caution you to be certain that you don't get case conversions when you
copy these files back and forth to the server, since then they might not
work on the windows client and may even prevent windows from starting.
I find it helpful in trouble shooting printers to change the path to some
place other than tmp, perhaps /TEST, and make the print command something
like: echo printed %s > /TEST/junk.%s (Make sure you create /TEST with
appropriate permissions.)
Then, after your print from the windows client, you could try lpr'ing the print file,
which should be nicely filtered
from the windows machine, to various queues. You could try different options
to the lpr command to see if any changes your luck. (man lpr). You also
might peruse man printcap to see if there aren't some options which might
stop this problem (sometimes the sh option prevents this.)
I know all this stuff because I have just spent a week trying to get a z53
lexmark to work off a linux server with windows clients. Still trying.
Hmmm.... I wonder if the rw option is what my server print queue needs? Gotta
go.
Joel
Return-Path: <gustavo.michels at emersonenergy.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (smtpmail.emrsn.co.uk
[194.202.166.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
B8BFE499B for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 02:24:12 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk (viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk
[129.254.5.225] (may be forged)) by ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3)
with SMTP id IAA19420 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2001
08:59:28 +0200
Received: from 129.254.5.5 by viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk (InterScan E-Mail
VirusWall NT); Sat, 25 Aug 2001 10:25:46 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time)
Received: from mxsemeacn1.emrsn.co.uk (mxsemeacn1.emrsn.co.uk
[129.254.5.202]) by etsdns2.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
KAA02919 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 10:27:54 GMT
Received: by mxsemeacn1.emrsn.co.uk with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id <RBSXLLZW>; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 10:27:04 +0100
Message-ID: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CC0111B60D at eesekkex001.kkekan
t.ericsson.se>
From: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" <gustavo.michels at emersonenergy.com>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: About shares: default valid users
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 18:42:51 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi all,
Maybe a simple question, but I can't find any info on this.
I have a Samba 2.2.1a server in a RH 7.1 with kernel 2.4.3. I have shares
setup like this:
[mkt]
path = /path/to/mktfiles
writable = yes
valid users = @mktusers
[hr]
path = /path/to/hrfiles
writable = yes
valid users = @hrusers
What I want is to have a default valid users (@admins) that should have
access to all the shares I define. I could do a 'valid users = @mktusers
@admins' for example but I was wondering if there was an easier way to do
this.
Any ideas?
Cheers
Gustavo
Return-Path: <tony.n at web.de>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mailgate4.cinetic.de (mailgate4.cinetic.de
[212.227.116.71]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461F34210
for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 03:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.web.de (smtp01.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.0.189]) by
mailgate4.cinetic.de (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) with SMTP
id f7PABGB00976 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 12:11:16
+0200
Received: from servitus by smtp.web.de with smtp (freemail 4.2.2.2 #11)
id m15aaPM-007obMC; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 12:11 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: atnonio nikolic <tony.n at web.de>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: 'root preexec' also executes at logoff
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 12:12:10 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <FCE23CF58EDED41180670004120237E904C1646C at corpexc4.freightli
ner.com> <20010824223647.A24500 at hammershome.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010824223647.A24500 at hammershome.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01082512121000.01572 at servitus>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello List!
When our users logon to their M$-NT4 or NT2K Clients they get notified about
their space usage on their home-rescources.
This is achieved by a perl script which is triggered by the "root preexec"
option in smb.conf.
My problem now is to find out, why this "root preexec" thinks it also should
act as a "root postexec":
Everytime a client logs off his client one can hear the "DING(.wav)" which
indicates that the client got a winpopup message.
Next time, you log onto the client you can see this message, that has been
sent, so that you get two messages telling different things, and what is
worst that any other user who logs in afterwards, recieves the message of the
user who logged off the last time...
Can anyone tell me how to get rid of this?
tony
Return-Path: <dandre at iris-tech.fr>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from smtp-2.nordnet.fr (smtp-2.nordnet.fr [194.206.126.252])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5C04ADA for
<samba at samba.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 05:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scomm.iris-tech.fr (mdm69.dialup2.nordnet.fr
[195.146.232.69]) by smtp-2.nordnet.fr (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id
OAA25295; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 14:24:02 +0200
Received: from (mail at localhost) by scomm.iris-tech.fr (8.9.3/jtpda-5.3)
id KAA05492 ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:27:49 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: scomm.iris-tech.fr: mail set sender to
<dandre at iris-tech.fr> using -f
Received: from siris.iris-tech.fr(192.168.0.100) by scomm.iris-tech.fr
via smap (V2.1) id xma005490; Fri, 24 Aug 01 10:27:39 +0200
Received: from dan.iris-tech.fr ([192.168.0.2] helo=iris-tech.fr
ident=dandre) by SIris.iris-tech.fr with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 15aBYU-00037r-00; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 09:39:02 +0200
Message-ID: <3B860495.751ACA46 at iris-tech.fr>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 09:39:01 +0200
From: Daniel ANDRE <dandre at iris-tech.fr>
Organization: IRIS Technologies
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [fr] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: fr,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Oliver <newsinabox at yahoo.de>
Cc: "samba at samba.org" <samba at samba.org>
Subject: Re: different shares for each user
References: <01C12C2A.D00C4C40.newsinabox at yahoo.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Oliver a icrit :
> On August 22, 2001, Daniel ANDRE wrote:
> > Oliver a icrit :
> > [...]
> >
> >> Since the file is included and parsed at the moment you start your smbd
> >> you can't use substitutions that depend on a user logging in. And since it
> >> is not a service specific parameter you can't use service specific substitutions.
> >
> > If I look at the log file, the file is correctly parsed (and included) at the logon
> > session but after (when I browse the network) it is not so the share is not
> > accessible
>
> I wonder which file is included since there is no user logging in when the
> include files is being parsed. Can you please post the name of the
> included file/username (I guess it is the one for the guest user).
Yes it is. I have "guest account = nobody" and the file included is include.nobody
I'd post a question:
Why the shares list is obtained from guest account? Is there a document anywhere
describing this?
Daniel
--
Daniel ANDRE (mailto:dandre at iris-tech.fr)
IRIS Technologies - http://www.iris-tech.com
Serveur kwartz - http://www.kwartz.com
Return-Path: <jlh at cc846558-a.twsn1.md.home.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from cc846558-a.twsn1.md.home.com
(cc846558-a.twsn1.md.home.com [24.182.146.18]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EEC74159 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 25
Aug 2001 06:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from jlh at localhost) by cc846558-a.twsn1.md.home.com
(8.9.1a/8.9.1) id JAA03467 for samba at lists.samba.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2001
09:29:28 -0400
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 09:29:28 -0400
From: Joel Hammer <jhammer2 at home.com>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Lexmark z53 printer and Samba: Anyone using this
combination?
Message-ID: <20010825092928.B3458 at hammershome.com>
References: <20010821230606.A25168 at hammershome.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010821230606.A25168 at hammershome.com>; from
Joel at HammersHome.com on Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 11:06:06PM -0400
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 11:06:06PM -0400, Joel Hammer wrote:
> I am having such troubles setting up this lexmark z53, I would like to know
> if anyone on this list is using this printer attached to a linux server and
> servicing windows95/98 clients?
> Works fine with linux clients, but the print job then is filtered locally.
> I wonder if there has to be some sort of two way talk between the client and
> the printer, which may not be happening with samba in the way.
> Joel
> --
It works now by disabling two way communication in the configuration options
on the windows client.
Joel
Return-Path: <jlh at cc846558-a.twsn1.md.home.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from cc846558-a.twsn1.md.home.com
(cc846558-a.twsn1.md.home.com [24.182.146.18]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5624AD3 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 25
Aug 2001 06:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from jlh at localhost) by cc846558-a.twsn1.md.home.com
(8.9.1a/8.9.1) id JAA03490 for samba at lists.samba.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2001
09:35:55 -0400
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 09:35:55 -0400
From: Joel Hammer <Joel at HammersHome.com>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Printer to PC communication in samba
Message-ID: <20010825093555.A3478 at hammershome.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have a lexmark z53 printer attached to a linux server. It requires printer to PC communication for
full functionality, I guess. I don't see how to provide printer to pc
communication with samba to networked windows clients.
Any insight appreciated.
Joel
Return-Path: <thiaga at myrealbox.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from MyRealbox.com (unknown [192.108.102.143]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B9F4B45 for
<samba at samba.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 06:41:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from thiaga [61.1.195.100] by myrealbox.com with NIMS ModWeb
Module; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 13:45:01 +0000
Subject: HELP - problem in accessing linux server thru' win98!
From: Thiagarajan <thiaga at myrealbox.com>
To: samba at samba.org,
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 13:45:01 +0000
X-Mailer: NIMS ModWeb Module
X-Sender: thiaga
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <998747101.492d2ff9thiaga at myrealbox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
There are three systems in my client place. All together connected thru' hub.
two system are installed with win98. And i installed linux 6.0. in the third
one.
And in the samba server everything was done correctly.
edited the file "/etc/smb.conf" with workgroup named as "MYGROUP" and i made a
user 'public' with a password. And gave all access to that folder
/home/public.
And even gave access to folders /home/profile and /home/netlogon and mkdir to
these two.
Now saved this file and restarted smbd.
And then i moved to win98 system and modified the regedit to set
"EnablePlainTextPassword" to 1 and in the networkneighbourhood for ethernet
card's property i set workgroup to "MYGROUP" and saved everything and
restarted the windows machine.
Here is the problem i got. When double clicked "network neighbourhood" i
displays "entire network" only. when double click it, it shows the error
message as "unable to browse".
The ip address for this win98 machine is 192.168.0.2 and for linux is
192.168.0.1.
I can ping to linux machine and get proper replies. And even i can telnet and
enter into linux machine.
But not thru' 'networkneighbourhood' nor 'windows explorer'.
What/where might be the problem?
Kindly clarify.
-thiaga
Return-Path: <newsinabox at yahoo.de>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from smtp012.mail.yahoo.com (smtp012.mail.yahoo.com
[216.136.173.32]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 049F34B13
for <samba at samba.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 07:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pd9e4e792.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO oliver)
(217.228.231.146) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Aug
2001 14:08:22 -0000
X-Apparently-From: <newsinabox at yahoo.de>
Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 16:11:16
+0200
Message-ID: <01C12D80.9188A5C0.newsinabox at yahoo.de>
From: Oliver <newsinabox at yahoo.de>
To: "samba at samba.org" <samba at samba.org>
Subject: RE: different shares for each user
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 16:11:11 +0200
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-Mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On August 24, 2001, Daniel ANDRE wrote:
>Oliver a icrit :
>
> [...]
>
>> I wonder which file is included since there is no user logging in when the
>> include files is being parsed. Can you please post the name of the
>> included file/username (I guess it is the one for the guest user).
>
> Yes it is. I have "guest account = nobody" and the file included is
include.nobody
>
> I'd post a question:
> Why the shares list is obtained from guest account? Is there a document
anywhere
> describing this?
The answer is quite simple:
When the first smbd is started it parses the smb.conf before accepting users
to log in. And all "include" statements are parsed at start-up. Since no user
is able to log in before the first smbd is running there can only be one
value
for %U: the name of the guest user as default. Finally, when smbd is running
and accepting users to log in the configuration file is not parsed again and
therefor the "include" statements are not evaluated anew with the current
user logging in (that's the known "chicken and egg problem").
So to get different shares for each user (in addition to the homes share)
you should try to use something like this:
[user-share]
path = /usr/samba/shares/%U
guest ok = no
read only = no
comment = different share for each user
[user-share2]
path = /usr/samba/shares/others/%U
guest ok = no
read only = no
comment = different share for each user no. 2
Or have a look at the "config file" statement (man pages smb.conf).
Maybe this will get you what you desire so it will be tricky to get it
working.
Oliver
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Return-Path: <fred at arkansaswebs.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from srvr201.castmark.com (unknown [209.38.98.99]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B66F14B13 for
<samba at samba.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 07:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bits.linuxball (bits [208.161.142.154]) by
srvr201.castmark.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f7PE9af22915; Sat,
25 Aug 2001 09:09:36 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Fred <fred at arkansaswebs.com>
To: Thiagarajan <thiaga at myrealbox.com>, samba at samba.org
Subject: Re: HELP - problem in accessing linux server thru' win98!
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 09:09:13 -0500
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <998747101.492d2ff9thiaga at myrealbox.com>
In-Reply-To: <998747101.492d2ff9thiaga at myrealbox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01082509091306.12871 at bits.linuxball>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Well, we would need more info to make an educated guess, but check to see if
you have a line 'restrict anonymous = No' in your smb.conf file.
BTW, what distribution of linux do you use? What version of samba? what
kernel?
Fred
_________________________________________________
On Saturday 25 August 2001 08:45 am, Thiagarajan wrote:
> Hi,
> There are three systems in my client place. All together connected thru'
> hub. two system are installed with win98. And i installed linux 6.0. in the
> third one.
> And in the samba server everything was done correctly.
>
> edited the file "/etc/smb.conf" with workgroup named as "MYGROUP" and i
> made a user 'public' with a password. And gave all access to that folder
> /home/public.
> And even gave access to folders /home/profile and /home/netlogon and mkdir
> to these two.
> Now saved this file and restarted smbd.
>
> And then i moved to win98 system and modified the regedit to set
> "EnablePlainTextPassword" to 1 and in the networkneighbourhood for ethernet
> card's property i set workgroup to "MYGROUP" and saved everything and
> restarted the windows machine.
> Here is the problem i got. When double clicked "network neighbourhood" i
> displays "entire network" only. when double click it, it shows the error
> message as "unable to browse".
> The ip address for this win98 machine is 192.168.0.2 and for linux is
> 192.168.0.1.
> I can ping to linux machine and get proper replies. And even i can telnet
> and enter into linux machine.
> But not thru' 'networkneighbourhood' nor 'windows explorer'.
>
> What/where might be the problem?
> Kindly clarify.
>
> -thiaga
Return-Path: <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C4545C8 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 08:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de
[131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.5/8.11.5) with ESMTP id
f7PFk2j16882; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 17:46:02 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by
enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id RAA03629; Sat, 25
Aug 2001 17:45:59 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by
fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA04429; Sat, 25 Aug
2001 17:46:31 +0200
From: "Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
To: samba at lists.samba.org, Josh Mattoon <matt7595 at cs.uidaho.edu>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 17:46:29 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: using samba 2.2.1a as w2k homedir server, not PDC
Message-ID: <3B87E475.30623.2DD46A at localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <998691870.20291.4.camel at brownlee.cs.uidaho.edu>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hm,
To summarize: You have changed the server that servers the profiles
to the clients and now you are in trouble? Rigth.
I do not have a solution for you, but may be a little hint: NT/W2K
profiles can't be copyed like normal files, because quite everything
(SID the belong to, Domain they belong to, ...) is stord in
ntuser.dat. That's a big problem when you change local profiles to
domain ones or profiels between domains. Somewhere in NT/W2K
(Settings, System, user profiles?) there is a posiblity to move a
profile to a new location.
I recomend the following:
create a new test user with a blank profile and try if this works in
your new set up. If not, ... :-(
If yes, make your way throuh the NT tools to handel profiles or be
crule to your users: Delete every bodies profile and let them start
new. Things like outlook.pst or (big) files (Desktop, ...) shouldn't
be in the profile any way.
Christian
> Hi all,
> This is my first post to this list... it may get a little long but i'd
> suppose the more info the better...
>
> I've got samba 2.2 set up quite well on a valinux6.2 machine. (redhat6.2
> with some va mods). I'm using domain security that authenticates
> through a win2k domain server. This works just fine. I can mount the
> shares and everything. On the linux side the users exist in the
> password file through nis (+::::::/bin/false). The users are pretty
> much 1/1 mapping with NT except for a few special NT related things that
> don't matter... At present, I'm using the samba server to share out
> automounted HP/UX 10.20 homedirs to W2k clients. This also works fine.
> I was a happy camper up until about a week ago.
>
> Here's the problem:
>
> Our W2k servers are out of space for home dirs and my boss wants me to
> move the homes to my new 100 gig raid linux server. We will still use
> the W2k for authentication of the domain (my boss really want's to have
> BDC support, somthing samba just doesn't have at this point). No
> problem, I thought. I went to the PDC and changed the location of my
> profile and home to the samba server. I created the directory and
> copied over my stuff from W2k. So, I've been testing this out and for
> the life of me I can't make it work on Win2k. When I logon to it a box
> pops up and says "Cannot copy file \\sambaserver\share\profile\somefile
> to C:\\documents and settings\username\somefile. Access is denied.
> Contact your Admin" Wait, that's me... hah. After that another window
> pops up saying "Can't download profile, using temp one instead" I'm
> pretty sure this only happens once you logon once. At any rate it does
> copy the file over and the file sits there in a folder called
> username.bak and i can't delete it, even as administrator. It says
> "File may be in use" even though they obviously aren't. I check out the
> permisions and they are owned by \sambaserver\user rather than
> \domain\user. I think this may be the problem. I tried to take
> ownership but i get an error saying "File security descriptor structure
> is invalid" or something to that effect. So now I'm stuck with some
> files i can't force W2k to delete and nothing works. It does, however,
> mount my homedirectory from the samba server and that works just fine.
> I got so frustrated that i found an old NT4 box and tried it. It worked
> perfectly!!! Is there some sort of crazy new "security descriptor
> structure" in NTFS5 that NTFS4 doesn't have?
>
> Does anyone know what's going on here? I've hit google harder than I
> ever have in my life and I'm still stumped.
>
> Thanks,
> Josh
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
_(_)_ wWWWw _
@@@@ (_)@(_) vVVVv _ @@@@ (___) _(_)_
@@()@@ wWWWw (_)\ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ Y (_)@(_)
@@@@ (___) `|/ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ \|/ (_)\
/ Y \| \|/ /(_) \| |/ |
\ | \ |/ | / \ | / \|/ |/ \| \|/
jgs|// \\|/// \\\|//\\\|/// \|/// \\\|// \\|// \\\|//
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Return-Path: <VDA at port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua (unknown [195.66.192.167])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8661048B9 for
<samba at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 08:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SKLD12 ([172.16.42.203]) by
Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id
f7PFmKh11857; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 18:48:20 +0300
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 18:52:05 +0300
From: VDA <VDA at port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.44)
Reply-To: VDA <VDA at port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
Organization: IMTP
Message-ID: <19915062438.20010825185205 at port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
To: Urban Widmark <urban at teststation.com>
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re[2]: smbmount problems
In-reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10108251659580.13314-100000 at ada.teststation.
com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10108251659580.13314-100000 at ada.teststation.c
om>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello Urban,
Saturday, August 25, 2001, 6:19:06 PM, you wrote:
>> The only thing left is this:
>> mount -t smbfs -o noexec //server/e /mnt
>> does not honor noexec! All files appear rwxr-xr-x.
UW> smbmount does not understand all flags that mount understands (including
UW> options that mount considers standard). To change permissions you need to
UW> set them with the fmask/dmask options.
Aha! Trying.... It works! Thanks!!!
UW> smbmount should understand noexec and pass it to the mount syscall as
UW> MS_NOEXEC. But it doesn't, and that's a bug.
Adding samba mailing list addr to CC :-)
UW> Note that noexec does not affect the permissions, it simply makes it
UW> impossible to actually execute things. The files can still have execute
UW> permissions.
Aha. But NT exec permissions are usually set on each readable file,
which is not Unix-like. So I prefer to override it with fmask.
--
Best regards,
VDA
mailto:VDA at port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua
http://port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua/vda/
Return-Path: <jlh at cc846558-a.twsn1.md.home.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from cc846558-a.twsn1.md.home.com
(cc846558-a.twsn1.md.home.com [24.182.146.18]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A7849BE for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 25
Aug 2001 08:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from jlh at localhost) by cc846558-a.twsn1.md.home.com
(8.9.1a/8.9.1) id LAA03862 for samba at lists.samba.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2001
11:56:24 -0400
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 11:56:24 -0400
From: Joel Hammer <Joel at HammersHome.com>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: HELP - problem in accessing linux server thru' win98!
Message-ID: <20010825115624.A3759 at hammershome.com>
References: <998747101.492d2ff9thiaga at myrealbox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <998747101.492d2ff9thiaga at myrealbox.com>; from
thiaga at myrealbox.com on Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 01:45:01PM +0000
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
No expert here but nothing regarding your user or passwords should be
causing the browsing problem.
You might check the browse section in the samba book that comes with the samba
distro. Browseable is set by default for all shares.
There are all sorts of ways to run down problems. For example:
Is nmbd running? Did samba start? Have you checked your logs?
More information about the samba
mailing list