No subject


Mon Dec 1 11:34:25 GMT 2003


        if((group_c = *lp_force_group(snum))) {
                BOOL is_guest = False;

some lines deleted

                token = create_nt_token(uid, gid, current_user.ngroups,current_user.groups, is_guest);
                must_free_token = True;
        }
        
        set_sec_ctx(uid, gid, current_user.ngroups, current_user.groups,token);

        /*
         * Free the new token (as set_sec_ctx copies it).
         */

        if (must_free_token)
                delete_nt_token(&token);
		^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^- here current_user.nt_user_token
becomes invalid.

You can triger the bug, if you connect to a printer share with a 'force
group = agroup' option an try to print. SIGSEGV.


I think the following patch should fix the problem.

--- samba-2.2.1a/source/smbd/sec_ctx.c~ Fri Jul  6 04:02:03 2001
+++ samba-2.2.1a/source/smbd/sec_ctx.c  Tue Jul 24 20:25:16 2001
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@
 	current_user.gid = gid;
 	current_user.ngroups = ngroups;
 	current_user.groups = groups;
-	current_user.nt_user_token = token;
+	current_user.nt_user_token = ctx_p->token;
 }
 

/****************************************************************************



-----------------------------------------------------------
Anselm Kruis    
science+computing ag     
                       
Tel.:   (089) 356 386 - 74 (s+c)
Fax.:   (089) 356 386 - 37
email:  A.Kruis at science-computing.de
-----------------------------------------------------------

Return-Path: <jojowil at hvcc.edu>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mail.hvcc.edu (mail.hvcc.edu [151.103.16.12]) by
  lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58744661; Tue, 24 Jul 2001
  12:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from academ.hvcc.edu (academ.hvcc.edu [151.103.16.11]) by
  mail.hvcc.edu (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.7) with ESMTP id PAA51720; Tue, 24 Jul
  2001 15:51:01 -0400
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 15:50:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: William Jojo <jojowil at hvcc.edu>
To: samba at samba.org, samba-technical at samba.org
Subject: rsync & smbpasswd
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.21.0107241546400.280634-100000 at academ.hvcc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

ok...i'm ready to use rsync to move copies of smbpasswd around, and I
suddenly have a major question...

what happens when a PC joins a domain (who rsync's smbpasswd from a
"master" host) and then rsync's to the master and overwrites the changes
just made to smbpasswd as a result of joining?

will there be a problem or am I just sniffing glue?

Bill

Return-Path: <jojowil at hvcc.edu>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from mail.hvcc.edu (mail.hvcc.edu [151.103.16.12]) by
  lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7864E8F; Tue, 24 Jul 2001
  12:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from academ.hvcc.edu (academ.hvcc.edu [151.103.16.11]) by
  mail.hvcc.edu (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.7) with ESMTP id QAA85986; Tue, 24 Jul
  2001 16:00:28 -0400
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 16:00:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: William Jojo <jojowil at hvcc.edu>
To: samba at samba.org, samba-technical at samba.org
Subject: Re: rsync & smbpasswd
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.21.0107241546400.280634-100000 at academ.hvcc.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.21.0107241558230.280634-100000 at academ.hvcc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

ok...nevermind....i figured it out...i'm basically screwed....i guess i'll
have to still do the NFS mount of the master smbpasswd file to all
servers and create a symbolic link in private to point there....there's
got to be a better way of doing this....

anybody got a better idea?

Bill

On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, William Jojo wrote:

> ok...i'm ready to use rsync to move copies of smbpasswd around, and I
> suddenly have a major question...
> 
> what happens when a PC joins a domain (who rsync's smbpasswd from a
> "master" host) and then rsync's to the master and overwrites the changes
> just made to smbpasswd as a result of joining?
> 
> will there be a problem or am I just sniffing glue?
> 
> Bill
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> 

Return-Path: <dan at coes.LaTech.edu>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from stardust.latech.edu (stardust.LaTech.edu [138.47.18.203])
  by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA924DA0 for
  <samba at samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 12:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (dan at localhost) by stardust.latech.edu
  (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f6OK2rN07548 for <samba at samba.org>; Tue,
  24 Jul 2001 15:02:53 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan at coes.LaTech.edu)
X-Authentication-Warning: stardust.latech.edu: dan owned process doing
  -bs
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 15:02:53 -0500 (CDT)
From: Daniel Schales <dan at coes.LaTech.edu>
X-X-Sender: <dan at stardust.latech.edu>
To: <samba at samba.org>
Subject: problem with "read raw"
Message-ID: <20010724144303.M39024-300000 at stardust.latech.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from MULTIPART/MIXED by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

After upgrading from 2.0.x to 2.2.1a (and eventually a CVS checkout from
earlier today), I began experiencing problems with people using Eudora
e-mail.  The problem would manifest itself when the user would attempt to
send E-mail with their Eudora folder (and hence their mailbox files) on
a network drive.  When they hit send, Eudora would sit there and
eventually come back with:

Could not read from file J:\eudora\Out.mbx
Cause: The request contains an invalid argument. (22)

The server logs this as "Connection reset by peer"

After spending two days banging my head (since this wasn't a universal
problem, but did seem to be spreading), I finally noticed in a tcpdump
that the last thing the server did was a readraw, so I disabled "read raw"
in smb.conf and the problem went away.

This particular server is a FreeBSD 4.2 system, connected on 100Mb
switched ethernet (the switch does not note any appreciable errors on any
port).  The client OS'es are Win95 OSR2 and Win98.

I also experienced the problem on a FreeBSD 4.3 server and the
problem went away there as well.  This one was a bit different.  The
server has been running 2.2.0 until I upgraded to 2.2.1 when it came out,
also attached at 100Mb, but the client was behind a "dirty" subnet in this
case.  Disabling read raw on this system also corrected it.  I'm not sure
if the problem was there in 2.2.0 are not on this system.  The person
having the problem was a new employee and started accessing the server
from this location after the upgrade to 2.2.1.

I've attached a debug level 10 logfile from the time period when the
connection failed and a tcpdump of the packet exchange (these are not
from the same time period).  You can see in the tcpdump that the
communications stall for 45 seconds (14:22:35 to 14:23:20) at which point
a new connection is established.

Thanks

-- 
Daniel Schales             Louisiana Tech University
Network/Unix Administrator Computing Center
dan at LaTech.edu
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 10] lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(601)
  got smb length of 81
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(836)
  got message type 0x0 of len 0x51
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(837)
  Transaction 310 of length 85
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(292)
  size=81
  smb_com=0x2d
  smb_rcls=0
  smb_reh=0
  smb_err=0
  smb_flg=0
  smb_flg2=0
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(298)
  smb_tid=1
  smb_pid=15571
  smb_uid=100
  smb_mid=27393
  smt_wct=15
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[1]=0 (0x0)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[2]=7 (0x7)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[3]=194 (0xC2)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[4]=22 (0x16)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[6]=33122 (0x8162)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[7]=15197 (0x3B5D)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[8]=1 (0x1)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[10]=0 (0x0)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[11]=0 (0x0)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[12]=0 (0x0)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[13]=0 (0x0)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[14]=0 (0x0)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308)
  smb_bcc=16
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1481)
  [000] 5C 45 55 44 4F 52 41 5C  4F 75 74 2E 6D 62 78 00  \EUDORA\ Out.mbx.
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650)
  switch message SMBopenX (pid 99749)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(119)
  Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(146)
  unix_convert called on file "\EUDORA\Out.mbx"
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(403)
  unix_clean_name [/EUDORA/Out.mbx]
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] smbd/mangle.c:is_8_3(338)
  Checking Out.mbx for 8.3
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(113)
  unix_mode(eudora/out.mbx) returning 0744
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] smbd/files.c:file_new(107)
  allocated file structure 565, fnum = 4661 (2 used)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 10] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared(610)
  open_file_shared: fname = eudora/out.mbx, share_mode = c2, ofun = 1, mode = 744, oplock request = 3
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1152)
  is_in_path: eudora/out.mbx
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1157)
  is_in_path: no name list.
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(403)
  unix_clean_name [eudora/out.mbx]
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:dos_mode(125)
  dos_mode: eudora/out.mbx
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1152)
  is_in_path: eudora/out.mbx
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1157)
  is_in_path: no name list.
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:dos_mode(169)
  dos_mode returning a
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 4] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared(739)
  calling open_file with flags=0x2 flags2=0x0 mode=0744
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 10] smbd/open.c:fd_open(52)
  fd_open: name eudora/out.mbx, flags = 06 mode = 0744, fd = 18. 
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(216)
  JDAUZAT opened file eudora/out.mbx read=Yes write=Yes (numopen=2)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 10] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared(840)
  open_file_shared : share_mode = 42
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:dos_mode(125)
  dos_mode: eudora/out.mbx
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1152)
  is_in_path: eudora/out.mbx
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1157)
  is_in_path: no name list.
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:dos_mode(169)
  dos_mode returning a
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(292)
  size=65
  smb_com=0x2d
  smb_rcls=0
  smb_reh=0
  smb_err=0
  smb_flg=128
  smb_flg2=1
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(298)
  smb_tid=1
  smb_pid=15571
  smb_uid=100
  smb_mid=27393
  smt_wct=15
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[1]=0 (0x0)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[2]=4661 (0x1235)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[3]=32 (0x20)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[4]=61700 (0xF104)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[5]=15195 (0x3B5B)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[6]=37647 (0x930F)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[7]=39 (0x27)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[8]=2 (0x2)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[10]=0 (0x0)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[11]=1 (0x1)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[12]=0 (0x0)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[13]=0 (0x0)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[14]=0 (0x0)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308)
  smb_bcc=0
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(559)
  write_socket(8,69)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(562)
  write_socket(8,69) wrote 69
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 10] lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(601)
  got smb length of 43
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(836)
  got message type 0x0 of len 0x2b
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(837)
  Transaction 311 of length 47
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(292)
  size=43
  smb_com=0x12
  smb_rcls=0
  smb_reh=0
  smb_err=0
  smb_flg=0
  smb_flg2=0
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(298)
  smb_tid=1
  smb_pid=15571
  smb_uid=100
  smb_mid=27521
  smt_wct=4
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[0]=4661 (0x1235)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[1]=2 (0x2)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308)
  smb_bcc=0
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650)
  switch message SMBlseek (pid 99749)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(119)
  Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_lseek(2869)
  lseek fnum=4661 ofs=0 newpos = 2593551 mode=2
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(292)
  size=39
  smb_com=0x12
  smb_rcls=0
  smb_reh=0
  smb_err=0
  smb_flg=128
  smb_flg2=1
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(298)
  smb_tid=1
  smb_pid=15571
  smb_uid=100
  smb_mid=27521
  smt_wct=2
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[0]=37647 (0x930F)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[1]=39 (0x27)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308)
  smb_bcc=0
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(559)
  write_socket(8,43)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(562)
  write_socket(8,43) wrote 43
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 10] lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(601)
  got smb length of 51
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(836)
  got message type 0x0 of len 0x33
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(837)
  Transaction 312 of length 55
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(292)
  size=51
  smb_com=0x1a
  smb_rcls=0
  smb_reh=0
  smb_err=0
  smb_flg=0
  smb_flg2=0
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(298)
  smb_tid=1
  smb_pid=15571
  smb_uid=100
  smb_mid=27649
  smt_wct=8
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[0]=4661 (0x1235)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[1]=37941 (0x9435)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[2]=39 (0x27)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[3]=3801 (0xED9)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[6]=0 (0x0)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(303)
  smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308)
  smb_bcc=0
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650)
  switch message SMBreadbraw (pid 99749)
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(119)
  Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_readbraw(2215)
  readbraw fnum=4661 start=2593845 max=3801 min=0 nread=-294
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 10] smbd/fileio.c:seek_file(63)
  seek_file: requested pos = 2593845, new pos = 2593845
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 4] lib/util.c:transfer_file(534)
  transfer_file n=0  (head=3) called
[2001/07/24 14:08:35, 5] smbd/reply.c:reply_readbraw(2249)
  readbraw finished
[2001/07/24 14:09:20, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(478)
  read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Connection reset by peer
[2001/07/24 14:09:20, 10] lib/util_sock.c:receive_smb(652)
  receive_smb: length < 0!
[2001/07/24 14:09:20, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(1069)
  receive_smb error (Connection reset by peer) exiting
[2001/07/24 14:09:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(317)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2001/07/24 14:09:20, 5] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_user(217)
  unbecome_user now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0)
[2001/07/24 14:09:20, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(448)
  Closing connections
[2001/07/24 14:09:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(317)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2001/07/24 14:09:20, 5] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_user(217)
  unbecome_user now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0)
[2001/07/24 14:09:20, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(650)
  dean (138.47.70.180) closed connection to service jdauzat
[2001/07/24 14:09:20, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(50)
  Yielding connection to jdauzat
[2001/07/24 14:09:20, 10] locking/posix.c:posix_locking_close_file(1309)
  posix_locking_close_file: file eudora/out.mbx has no outstanding locks.
[2001/07/24 14:09:20, 2] smbd/close.c:close_normal_file(205)
  jdauzat closed file eudora/out.mbx (numopen=1) 
[2001/07/24 14:09:20, 5] smbd/files.c:file_free(306)
  freed files structure 4661 (1 used)
[2001/07/24 14:09:20, 10] locking/posix.c:posix_locking_close_file(1309)
  posix_locking_close_file: file eudora/eudora.log has no outstanding locks.
[2001/07/24 14:09:20, 2] smbd/close.c:close_normal_file(205)
  jdauzat closed file eudora/eudora.log (numopen=0) 
[2001/07/24 14:09:20, 5] smbd/files.c:file_free(306)
  freed files structure 4610 (0 used)
[2001/07/24 14:09:20, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(317)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2001/07/24 14:09:20, 5] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_user(217)
  unbecome_user now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0)
[2001/07/24 14:09:20, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(50)
  Yielding connection to 
[2001/07/24 14:09:20, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(483)
  Server exit (normal exit)
14:22:35.224336 pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1120 > woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn: P 17550649:17550734(85) ack 788588384 win 8188
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=81 (0x51)

SMB PACKET: SMBopenX (REQUEST)

 (DF)
14:22:35.224570 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1120: . ack 85 win 17435 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:22:35.225773 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1120: P 1:70(69) ack 85 win 17520
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=65 (0x41)

SMB PACKET: SMBopenX (REPLY)

 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:22:35.226052 pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1120 > woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn: P 85:132(47) ack 70 win 8119
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=43 (0x2b)

SMB PACKET: SMBlseek (REQUEST)

 (DF)
14:22:35.226253 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1120: . ack 132 win 17473 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:22:35.226591 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1120: P 70:113(43) ack 132 win 17520
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=39 (0x27)

SMB PACKET: SMBlseek (REPLY)

 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:22:35.227399 pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1120 > woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn: P 132:187(55) ack 113 win 8076
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=51 (0x33)

SMB PACKET: SMBreadbraw (REQUEST)

 (DF)
14:22:35.227592 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1120: . ack 187 win 17465 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:22:35.227966 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1120: P 113:116(3) ack 187 win 17520
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x1
Length=65280 (0xff00)
Session packet:(raw data?)

 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:22:35.379526 pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1120 > woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn: . ack 116 win 8073 (DF)
14:23:20.199363 pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1120 > woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn: R 17550836:17550836(0) win 0 (DF)
14:23:20.203399 pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121 > woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn: S 17080489:17080489(0) win 8192 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK> (DF)
14:23:20.203798 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: S 812355017:812355017(0) ack 17080490 win 17520 <mss 1460> (DF)
14:23:20.203961 pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121 > woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn: . ack 1 win 8760 (DF)
14:23:20.203984 pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121 > woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn: P 1:73(72) ack 1 win 8760
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Request
Flags=0x81000044
Destination=WOODARD         NameType=0x20 (Server)
Source=D               NameType=0x00 (Workstation)

 (DF)
14:23:20.204232 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: . ack 73 win 17448 (DF)
14:23:20.562094 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: P 1:5(4) ack 73 win 17520
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Granted
Flags=0x82000000

 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.562346 pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121 > woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn: P 73:231(158) ack 5 win 8756
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=154 (0x9a)

SMB PACKET: SMBnegprot (REQUEST)

 (DF)
14:23:20.562585 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: . ack 231 win 17362 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.564985 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: P 5:96(91) ack 231 win 17520
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=87 (0x57)

SMB PACKET: SMBnegprot (REPLY)

 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.565433 pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121 > woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn: P 231:393(162) ack 96 win 8665
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=158 (0x9e)

SMB PACKET: SMBsesssetupX (REQUEST)

 (DF)
14:23:20.565639 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: . ack 393 win 17358 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.579626 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: P 96:185(89) ack 393 win 17520
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=85 (0x55)

SMB PACKET: SMBsesssetupX (REPLY)

 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.579859 pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121 > woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn: P 393:454(61) ack 185 win 8576
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=57 (0x39)

SMB PACKET: SMBgetatr (REQUEST)

 (DF)
14:23:20.580076 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: . ack 454 win 17459 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.606997 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: P 185:224(39) ack 454 win 17520
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=35 (0x23)

SMB PACKET: SMBgetatr (REPLY)

 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.607388 pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121 > woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn: P 454:928(474) ack 224 win 8537
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=470 (0x1d6)

SMB PACKET: SMBwrite (REQUEST)

 (DF)
14:23:20.607596 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: . ack 928 win 17046 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.608960 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: P 224:263(39) ack 928 win 17520
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=35 (0x23)

SMB PACKET: SMBwrite (REPLY)

 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.609334 pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121 > woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn: P 928:1018(90) ack 263 win 8498
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=86 (0x56)

SMB PACKET: SMBopenX (REQUEST)

 (DF)
14:23:20.609533 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: . ack 1018 win 17430 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.612226 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: P 263:332(69) ack 1018 win 17520
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=65 (0x41)

SMB PACKET: SMBopenX (REPLY)

 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.612529 pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121 > woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn: P 1018:1119(101) ack 332 win 8429
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=97 (0x61)

SMB PACKET: SMBtrans2 (REQUEST)

 (DF)
14:23:20.612736 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: . ack 1119 win 17419 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.615035 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: P 332:510(178) ack 1119 win 17520
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=174 (0xae)

SMB PACKET: SMBtrans2 (REPLY)

 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.615284 pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121 > woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn: P 1119:1160(41) ack 510 win 8251
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=37 (0x25)

SMB PACKET: SMBfindclose (REQUEST)

 (DF)
14:23:20.615490 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: . ack 1160 win 17479 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.615820 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: P 510:549(39) ack 1160 win 17520
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=35 (0x23)

SMB PACKET: SMBfindclose (REPLY)

 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.616102 pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121 > woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn: P 1160:1248(88) ack 549 win 8212
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=84 (0x54)

SMB PACKET: SMBopenX (REQUEST)

 (DF)
14:23:20.616293 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: . ack 1248 win 17432 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.617250 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: P 549:618(69) ack 1248 win 17520
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=65 (0x41)

SMB PACKET: SMBopenX (REPLY)

 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.617509 pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121 > woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn: P 1248:1293(45) ack 618 win 8143
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=41 (0x29)

SMB PACKET: SMBclose (REQUEST)

 (DF)
14:23:20.617704 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: . ack 1293 win 17475 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.618538 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: P 618:657(39) ack 1293 win 17520
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=35 (0x23)

SMB PACKET: SMBclose (REPLY)

 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.618719 pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121 > woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn: P 1293:1338(45) ack 657 win 8104
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=41 (0x29)

SMB PACKET: SMBclose (REQUEST)

 (DF)
14:23:20.618918 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: . ack 1338 win 17475 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.619740 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: P 657:696(39) ack 1338 win 17520
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=35 (0x23)

SMB PACKET: SMBclose (REPLY)

 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.619919 pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121 > woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn: P 1338:1397(59) ack 696 win 8065
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=55 (0x37)

SMB PACKET: SMBgetatr (REQUEST)

 (DF)
14:23:20.620119 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: . ack 1397 win 17461 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.620622 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: P 696:755(59) ack 1397 win 17520
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=55 (0x37)

SMB PACKET: SMBgetatr (REPLY)

 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.620850 pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121 > woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn: P 1397:1458(61) ack 755 win 8006
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=57 (0x39)

SMB PACKET: SMBunlink (REQUEST)

 (DF)
14:23:20.621066 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: . ack 1458 win 17459 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.622054 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: P 755:794(39) ack 1458 win 17520
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=35 (0x23)

SMB PACKET: SMBunlink (REPLY)

 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.622332 pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121 > woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn: P 1458:1546(88) ack 794 win 7967
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=84 (0x54)

SMB PACKET: SMBopenX (REQUEST)

 (DF)
14:23:20.622531 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: . ack 1546 win 17432 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.624971 woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn > pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121: P 794:863(69) ack 1546 win 17520
>>> NBT Packet
NBT Session Packet
Flags=0x0
Length=65 (0x41)

SMB PACKET: SMBopenX (REPLY)

 (DF) [tos 0x8] 
14:23:20.774288 pc180.CoE.LaTech.edu.1121 > woodard.latech.edu.netbios-ssn: . ack 863 win 7898 (DF)

Return-Path: <a.averroes at libertysurf.fr>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from othello.medracen.net (e166.dhcp212-198-230.noos.fr
  [212.198.230.166]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
  34269420D for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:17:58 -0700
  (PDT)
Received: from libertysurf.fr (jugurtha.medracen.net [192.168.123.13])
  by othello.medracen.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF15123D0; Tue, 24
  Jul 2001 22:37:21 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <3B5DDC5A.F785D977 at libertysurf.fr>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 22:36:42 +0200
From: Averroes <a.averroes at libertysurf.fr>
Reply-To: a.averroes at libertysurf.fr
Organization: Averroes
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en-gb] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,en-GB,en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dennis <dennis.moreno at pop.safetran.com>
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Password length in 2.2.0
References: <3B5C5200.491362AD at pop.safetran.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

Hi Dennis,

I have experimented the same problem.
So, nothing to do I decided to reduce password size.

Bye.

dennis wrote:

> Does anyone know if this problem got resolved in 2.2.1?
>
> Thanks,
> Dennis
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We recently upgraded from 2.0.7 to 2.2.0. When using 2.0.7, we had some
> > passwords that were 9-10 characters long and used them with no problems.
> > After
> > upgrading to 2.2.0, the 9-10 character passwords no longer work
> > (basically,
> > anything over 8 characters didn't work). After some investigation, we
> > found that if a
> > password existed that was over 8 characters, it worked. But if we
> > created a new password
> > over eight characters, it wouldn't work. Or if we changed an existing 10
> > character
> > password to a different password over 8 characters long, it wouldn't
> > work. In
> > summary, passwords had to be 8 characters or less to be used reliably
> > with samba.
> >
> > Can anyone explain what's happening? Did something with password length
> > change in samba 2.2.0?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Dennis
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

--
#---------------------------------------------------------------------
# Averroes A. Aysha
# Think Linux, Think Slackware !
# Network Security Auditor (NSA)
# a.averroes at libertysurf.fr
#---------------------------------------------------------------------

Return-Path: <dan_thibadeau at hp.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from palrel1.hp.com (palrel1.hp.com [156.153.255.242]) by
  lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F214BAC for
  <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xparelay2.corp.hp.com (unknown [15.58.137.112]) by
  palrel1.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F2515AC for
  <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xpabh2.corp.hp.com (xpabh2.corp.hp.com [15.58.136.192])
  by xparelay2.corp.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F701F520 for
  <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by xpabh2.corp.hp.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
  id <3PL0TSKG>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:27:12 -0700
Message-ID: <028FE7141C79D511B65100D0B74FE875CF9A98 at xrose01.rose.hp.com>
From: "THIBADEAU,DAN (HP-Roseville,ex1)" <dan_thibadeau at hp.com>
To: "'samba at lists.samba.org'" <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Printing with 2.2.1a shows wrong owner and document name
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:27:02 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

I'm using Samba 2.2.1a on HPUX 11.

The problem is that the Windows NT4 queue status window shows the correct
filename and owner of a document for about 15 seconds, then changes them.

For example, if I print from Notpad a document called "test.txt - Notepad"
and my username is "dan_thibadeau" and quickly do a "refresh" on the window
I see the correct information.  When I refresh after a few seconds, the name
of the document has changed to "smbprn.a06131" with an owher of "mossadm"
(the unix name dan_thibadeau maps to in username map).

I assume at this point that Samba is caching the information (lpq cache time
= 15) for 15 seconds only.  After that it dumps the information and has to
rely on the returned responce from the "lpq command" (in my case "lpstat
-o%p").

Thanks,

Dan T.

==========================================
Dan Thibadeau
HP NAOD Managed Output Services Engineer
Hewlett Packard Co.                   Phone: (208) 396-5936
11311 Chinden Blvd.                      FAX: (208) 938-3546
Boise, ID 83714            Email: dan_thibadeau at hp.com
==========================================

Return-Path: <idra at samba.org>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id ED4A14DF6;
  Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:37:33 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:37:33 -0700
To: William Jojo <jojowil at hvcc.edu>
Cc: samba at samba.org, samba-technical at samba.org
Subject: Re: rsync & smbpasswd
Message-ID: <20010724133733.A4407 at va.samba.org>
References: <Pine.A41.4.21.0107240920580.291880-100000 at academ.hvcc.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.21.0107240920580.291880-100000 at academ.hvcc.edu>
  ; from jojowil at hvcc.edu on Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 09:26:01AM -0400
From: idra at samba.org (Simo Sorce)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 09:26:01AM -0400, William Jojo wrote:
> 
> 
> I have several Samba 2.2.1a servers running on several AIX 4.3.3 and 5.1.0
> boxes.
> 
> Presently they share the private/smbpasswd file via a symbolic link to an
> NFS share where the "master" file exists. I hate this because I can't 
> reboot certain systems when I need to.
> 
> So, if I rsync the smbpasswd file on the clients and retrieve it from the
> master, will I:
> 
> 1) Succeed.

you will succed.
> 
> 2) Create a locking issue when a station tries to authenticate and the
> machine account, user id or both are missing from the file because the
> transfer is incomplete?

if you fear that, simply make a script that rsync to a different file and then
move that file over the correct one. A move is really fast (just changes one or two inodes)

> we have 13,240 entries in smbpasswd so it takes a few seconds even on
> 100Mbit or Gig
> 
> or am i just being too cautious?
> 
> Please advise....
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> Bill
> 
> 

-- 
Simo Sorce       idra at samba.org
-------------------------------
Samba Team http://www.samba.org

Return-Path: <ip2ip at yahoo.de>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from web13804.mail.yahoo.com (web13804.mail.yahoo.com
  [216.136.175.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 81E244F0A
  for <samba at samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 14:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20010724211906.56516.qmail at web13804.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [217.81.146.153] by web13804.mail.yahoo.com; Tue, 24 Jul
  2001 23:19:06 CEST
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 23:19:06 +0200 (CEST)
From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?I.=20P.?=" <ip2ip at yahoo.de>
Subject: upper/lower case trouble with mounted fat32 partition
To: samba at samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

hello samba team,
i use the latest samba 2.2.1a on an intel cpu and i've
mounted and shared a fat32 partition. when i try to
copy or to make a new file on a windows 98SE client,
the filenames are allways only upper or only lower
case - never mixed. i've tried any possible
combination of "(short) preserve case" and other
mangling options. with the same configuration (or just
without any mangling option) but a shared
ext2-partition samba does a nice job and any file
appears right.

tia
isi
P.S. i've sent this mail also to your bug tracking system

__________________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de

Return-Path: <dan_thibadeau at hp.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from palrel1.hp.com (palrel1.hp.com [156.153.255.242]) by
  lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6902442A7 for
  <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 14:17:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xparelay1.corp.hp.com (unknown [15.58.136.173]) by
  palrel1.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A4A1281 for
  <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 14:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xpabh3.corp.hp.com (xpabh3.corp.hp.com [15.58.136.223])
  by xparelay1.corp.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF92D1F555 for
  <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 14:22:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by xpabh3.corp.hp.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
  id <PDMAT14L>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 14:22:53 -0700
Message-ID: <028FE7141C79D511B65100D0B74FE875CF9A99 at xrose01.rose.hp.com>
From: "THIBADEAU,DAN (HP-Roseville,ex1)" <dan_thibadeau at hp.com>
To: "'samba at lists.samba.org'" <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Installing drivers gets error: Out of pipe structures
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 14:22:50 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

I'm using Samba 2.2.1a on HPUX 11

Whenever I try to add drivers to the samba server from my Win2000
workstation, I get an error saying "print subsystem unavailable".  It then
locks up Samba and nobody can connect anymore.

In the smb.conf (debug=1) i get the following error:

[2001/07/24 14:53:15, 1] lib/debug.c:(245)
  INFO: Debug class all level = 1   (pid 9339 from pid 9339)
[2001/07/24 14:57:58, 1] smbd/service.c:(606)
  ros-thibadeau (15.118.9.93) connect to service print$ as user mossadm
(uid=501
, gid=7) (pid 9339)
[2001/07/24 14:58:53, 1] smbd/service.c:(644)
  ros-thibadeau (15.118.9.93) closed connection to service print$
[2001/07/24 14:59:53, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:(144)
  ERROR! Out of pipe structures
[2001/07/24 14:59:53, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:(144)
  ERROR! Out of pipe structures
[2001/07/24 14:59:58, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:(144)     

Do I need to tune the HPUX kernel or is this an internal Samba paramater?

Thanks,

Dan T.                  

==========================================
Dan Thibadeau
HP NAOD Managed Output Services Engineer
Hewlett Packard Co.                   Phone: (208) 396-5936
11311 Chinden Blvd.                      FAX: (208) 938-3546
Boise, ID 83714            Email: dan_Thibadeau at hp.com
==========================================

Return-Path: <bryan4368 at yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from smtp014.mail.yahoo.com (smtp014.mail.yahoo.com
  [216.136.173.58]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5C7A420D
  for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 14:26:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs2428106-106.houston.rr.com (HELO win2k) (24.28.106.106)
  by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Jul 2001 21:31:59 -0000
X-Apparently-From: <bryan4368 at yahoo.com>
From: "Bryan" <bryan4368 at yahoo.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: windows logon failer.
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 16:33:10 -0500
Message-ID: <002a01c11488$3d3006f0$6501a8c0 at win2k>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <001c01c11485$2cf2cc80$6601a8c0 at jonathon>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

Wow what a mouth full.  I am working on it as we speak.  Thank you very much
for your help.

Thank You
Bryan Pershall
Desktop Support Specialist
Hm 713-983-6031
Cell 281-433-0530
e-mail: bryan4368 at yahoo.com


-----Original Message-----
From: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
[mailto:samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Jonathon Evans
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 4:11 PM
To: bpershall at houston.rr.com
Cc: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: windows logon failer.


    It sounds like somewhere your users passwords are not set right.  I
would test a user by using smbclient on the samba server.  Log on to the
samba server and type "smbclient -L localhost -U <username>" without the
quotes.  It will then ask for the password of whatever user you typed for
username.  If everything is working fine it should display all the shares
that user has access to.

       If you get an bad password error your user isn't setup right.  Since
your using encrypted passwords you have to add each user to smbpasswd.  Type
"smbpasswd -a <username>" and enter in a password when it asks for it to add
a user.  After adding a user test the logon with smbclient like shown above.
If it works you should be able to logon to the domain in win98.

    As for the Win2k machine not seeing the samba server it may have
something to do with netbios being disabled on tcp/ip.  Right click on "My
Network Places" and choose properties.  Then right-click on "Local Area
Connection" or whatever your networks name is and choose properties.  Scroll
down to Internet Protocol(TCP/IP) click on it and choose properties.  Click
the Advanced Button.  In Advance TCP/IP Settings click the WINS tab.  Make
sure "Enable NetBIOS over TCP/IP" has been selected.  Win2k has the "Use
setting from DHCP Server" set by default.  Once netbios has been enabled on
TCP/IP you should be able to see the SAMBA server in My Network Places.  You
might have to go to entire network and select your workgroup from there.  I
think WinNT4.0 has a simialr netbios setting thaat you could check, but I'm
not sure since I have no WinNT 4 experience.  Windows 9X enables Netbios
over TCP/IP so that explains why you see it in win9x but not NT.

I hope this helps you out.

Jonathon Evans


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bryan Pershall" <bpershall at houston.rr.com>
To: "samba nt domain list" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:59 AM
Subject: windows logon failer.


> I am trying to log a win98 machine onto a sambaserve as the pdc.
>
> Allof the user names and machine names are set I think.  I created thim
manualy.
>
> The error that I am getting is the domain password that you supplied is
incorect.
>
> Also I have a problem with an nt4 andwn2k machine they cannot see the
sambaserver
>
> in there network neighborhood.  Is this normal and is there a way to fix
it.
>
> Attached is a copy of my config file.
>
> Please help
> #======================= Global Settings
=====================================
> [global]
> ;   coding system =
>    client code page =
>    workgroup =  cad
>    netbios name = bryanserver
>    netbios aliases = bryanserver
> ;  netbios scope =
>    server string = samba server
> ;  interfaces =
> ;  bind interfaces only =no
>    security = user
>    encrypt passwords = yes
>    update encrypted = no
>    allow trusted domains = yes
> ;  host equiv =
>    min password length = 5
>    map to guest = never
>    null password = no
> ;  password server =
>    smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
>    root directory = /
>    guest ok = yes
>    hosts allow = 192.168.1.  127.
>    load printers = yes
> ;   printcap name = /etc/printcap
> ;   printcap name = lpstat
> ;   printing = bsd
>    guest account = ftp
>    log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m
>    max log size = 50
> ;   include = /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf.%m
>    SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
>    socket options = TCP_NODELAY
> ;   interfaces = 192.168.12.2/24 192.168.13.2/24
>     local master = yes
>     os level = 64
>    domain master = yes
>    preferred master = yes
>    domain logons = yes
>
> ;   logon script = %m.bat
> ;   logon script = %U.bat
>    logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U
>    logon home = /home/%u
>    logon scipt = %m.bat
>    logon script = %u.bat
>    wins support = yes
> ;   wins server = w.x.y.z
>    wins proxy = yes
>    dns proxy = yes
>
> #============================ Share Definitions
==============================
> [homes]
>    comment = Home Directories
>    browseable = no
>    writable = yes
>  [netlogon]
>    comment = Network Logon Service
>    path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon
>    guest ok = yes
>    writable = no
>    share modes = no
> [Profiles]
>    path = /usr/local/samba/profiles
>     browseable = no
>     guest ok = yes
>     writeable = yes
>     creat mask = 0600
>     directory mask = 0700
> [printers]
>    comment = All Printers
>    path = /usr/spool/samba
>    browseable = no
>    public = yes
>    guest ok = no
>    writable = no
>    printable = yes
> [tmp]
>    comment = Temporary file space
>    path = /tmp
>    read only = no
>    public = yes
>    browseable = yes
> [cadfiles]
>    comment = cad
>    path = /home/cad
>    public = yes
>    writable = yes
>    printable = yes
>    browseable = yes
> ;[fredsprn]
> ;   comment = Fred's Printer
> ;   valid users = fred
> ;   path = /homes/fred
> ;   printer = freds_printer
> ;   public = no
> ;   writable = no
> ;   printable = yes
> ;[fredsdir]
> ;   comment = Fred's Service
> ;   path = /usr/somewhere/private
> ;   valid users = fred
> ;   public = no
> ;   writable = yes
> ;   printable = no
>
> # a service which has a different directory for each machine that connects
> # this allows you to tailor configurations to incoming machines. You could
> # also use the %U option to tailor it by user name.
> # The %m gets replaced with the machine name that is connecting.
> ;[pchome]
> ;  comment = PC Directories
> ;  path = /usr/pc/%m
> ;  public = no
> ;  writable = yes
>
> # A publicly accessible directory, read/write to all users. Note that all
files
> # created in the directory by users will be owned by the default user, so
> # any user with access can delete any other user's files. Obviously this
> # directory must be writable by the default user. Another user could of
course
> # be specified, in which case all files would be owned by that user
instead.
> ;[public]
> ;   path = /usr/somewhere/else/public
> ;   public = yes
> ;   only guest = yes
> ;   writable = yes
> ;   printable = no
>
> # The following two entries demonstrate how to share a directory so that
two
> # users can place files there that will be owned by the specific users. In
this
> # setup, the directory should be writable by both users and should have
the
> # sticky bit set on it to prevent abuse. Obviously this could be extended
to
> # as many users as required.
> ;[myshare]
> ;   comment = Mary's and Fred's stuff
> ;   path = /usr/somewhere/shared
> ;   valid users = mary fred
> ;   public = no
> ;   writable = yes
> ;   printable = no
> ;   create mask = 0765


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


Return-Path: <hugol at ece.mcgill.ca>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from orion.ECE.McGill.CA (Orion.ECE.McGill.CA
  [132.206.77.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000A742FC
  for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 14:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proserpine (Proserpine.ECE.McGill.CA [132.206.31.219]) by
  orion.ECE.McGill.CA (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA18071 for
  <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 17:58:11 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-To: <hugol at ece.mcgill.ca>
From: "Hugo Levasseur" <hugol at ece.mcgill.ca>
To: "Samba Mailing List" <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Compiling ACL support
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 17:59:30 -0400
Message-ID: <000001c1148b$eaaed2e0$db1fce84 at proserpine>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

When compiling samba ACL support I get the following error:

---start of quote---
Compiling smbd/server.c
In file included from include\includes.h:740
	from smbd/server.c:22:

Include/proto.h:209 parse error before 'the_acl'
---end of quote---

This goes on for a few lines (about 50 lines of simillar errors) and
then the make exists...on the error.

I m using the 2.4-xfs kernel from sgi's cvs (so the actual kernel
version is 2.4.7) I ve run the xfs tests successfully.  Acl.h seems to
be installed in /usr/include/sys/.  

Any clues?

Thank you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
  Hugo Levasseur, System Administrator   
  ECE Computing Labs, McGill University  
  3480 University Str. Montreal, Quebec 
  tel:514-398-1691
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------

Return-Path: <arfernando001 at hotmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from hotmail.com (f24.law15.hotmail.com [64.4.23.24]) by
  lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A85454B for
  <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 15:07:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft
  SMTPSVC; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 15:12:47 -0700
Received: from 12.4.27.248 by lw15fd.law15.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
  Tue, 24 Jul 2001 22:12:46 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [12.4.27.248]
From: "arthur fernando" <arfernando001 at hotmail.com>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: log.nmbd errors
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 18:12:46 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-ID: <F24vvsGOkevWWGxegIq0000676b at hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jul 2001 22:12:47.0308 (UTC)
  FILETIME=[C51D98C0:01C1148D]
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from text/html by demime 0.98b
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

Please help me. I am getting errors in my "log.nmbd" file: 2001/07/24
04:55:57, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_lmb.c:become_local_master_stage2(405)

*****

Samba name server TESTSERVER is now a local master browser for workgroup
TEST on subnet 172.10.111.11

*****

[2001/07/24 04:55:57, 0]
nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:find_domain_master_name_query_fail(360)find_domain_master_name_query_fail:
Unable to find the Domain Master Browser name TEST<1b> for the workgroup
TEST.
Unable to sync browse lists in this workgroup.
[2001/07/24 05:10:58, 0]
nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:find_domain_master_name_query_fail(360)find_domain_master_name_query_fail:
Unable to find the Domain Master Browser name TEST<1b> for the workgroup
TEST.
Unable to sync browse lists in this workgroup.
[2001/07/24 05:26:07, 0]
nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:find_domain_master_name_query_fail(360)find_domain_master_name_query_fail:
Unable to find the Domain Master Browser name TEST<1b> for the workgroup
TEST.
Unable to sync browse lists in this workgroup.

Anyone have any clues about  ..._fail(360)?

Here is my "smb.conf":

workgroup = test
log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%I
max log size = 50
#
security = user
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
preferred master = yes
#
wins server = 172.17.112.49
dns proxy = no
[homes]
omment = Home Directories
browseable = no
writable = yes

Have I configured my smb.conf file correctly?

Thank you all for your help.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

Return-Path: <rogelio at ats-corp.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from stimpy.ats-corp.com (unknown [63.172.19.4]) by
  lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B2F4547 for
  <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 15:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by stimpy.ats-corp.com with Internet Mail Service
  (5.5.2650.21) id <PMY7QF0A>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 18:39:35 -0400
Message-ID: <70603A72A37FD411B11600600898FB76039359 at stimpy.ats-corp.com>
From: "Rogelio J. Baucells" <rogelio at ats-corp.com>
To: "'samba at lists.samba.org'" <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: winbindd?
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 18:39:31 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

I searched on the net and found some posts with similar problems, but I
noticed that the error message they had was a little different from mine:

Error message I am getting:
"smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1572)  domain_client_validate: could
not fetch trust account password for domain"

Error messages in other posts:
"smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1572)  domain_client_validate: could
not fetch trust account password for domain DOMAIN"

If you check "smbd/password.c" (line 1572):
DEBUG(0, ("domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password
for domain %s\n", global_myworkgroup));

The error message should have the DOMAIN at the end. It seams that for
another reason I do not have global_myworkgroup set to my DOMAIN.

I fetched the whole HEAD cvs tree again (7/24/2001 3:45 PM), and now it does
not compile:

Compiling nsswitch/winbindd_glue.c
nsswitch/winbindd_glue.c:443: conflicting types for `wb_samr_query_dispinfo'
include/proto.h:1729: previous declaration of `wb_samr_query_dispinfo'
make: *** [nsswitch/winbindd_glue.o] Error 1

I am using 
./configure
	--prefix=/usr/local/samba2 \
	--with-quotas \
	--with-smbmount \
	--with-pam \
	--with-syslog

Rogelio J.
ATS

-----Original Message-----
From: Rogelio J. Baucells [mailto:rogelio at ats-corp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 2:08 PM
To: 'samba at lists.samba.org'
Subject: winbindd?


Hello

I posted a question a couple of hours ago and it seams that anyone knows
what is happening.

Is there anyone using winbind?
Is this the right mailing list for that post?

Thanks

Rogelio J. 
ATS
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Return-Path: <jvsmith at midamer.net>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.midamer.net (midmail.net [207.3.64.28]) by
  lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8613E4A59 for
  <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 16:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from athlon ([208.149.202.23]) by mail.midamer.net
  (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-67032U4000L2200S0V35) with
  SMTP id net for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 18:13:14
  -0500
From: "Jason Smith" <jvsmith at midamer.net>
To: "Samba List" <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: Does SWAT Run in Samba 2.2.1a??
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 18:12:31 -0500
Message-ID: <LPBBILKEIJONKIOLBNJGIENNCKAA.jvsmith at midamer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <AB802CEF9C2DD411AA9800A0C9E927E74B86EA at datalux_exc>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

I've also had this problem when compiling from source on a RedHat 7.1 box.
When I configured
did --prefix=/usr/local --sysconfdir=/etc/samba --with-ssl --with-sslinc=/us
r/include/openssl --with-pam --with-pam_smbpass --with-smbmount --with-lockd
ir=/var/lock/samba --with-privatedir=/etc/samba --with-swatdir=/usr/local/sw
at --with-syslog.  I've also tried compiling w/o the pam options.  I have
another RedHat 7.1 box with 2.2.0a and swat works fine.
Here's my /etc/xinetd.d/swat
# default on
# SWAT - Samba Web administration Tool
#
service swat
{
        socket_type     = stream
        wait            = no
        user            = root
        server          = /usr/local/sbin/swat
        disable         = no
}

The error I get when using IE and lynx is username or password incorrect.

Any help on this would be appreciated.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: samba-admin at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin at lists.samba.org]On
> Behalf Of Bill Markley
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 14:07
> To: John Benedetto; Bill Markley; Samba List
> Subject: RE: Does SWAT Run in Samba 2.2.1a??
>
>
> Well, when I use the URL "http://localhost:901" Netscape returns a message
> "The document contained no data.  Try again later, or contact the server's
> administrator."  Attached is a listing of the swat file in /etc/xinetd.d
> directory.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Benedetto [mailto:jbenedet at unm.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 3:48 PM
> To: Bill Markley; Samba List
> Subject: Re: Does SWAT Run in Samba 2.2.1a??
>
>
> --On Tuesday, July 24, 2001 2:23 PM -0400 Bill Markley
> <BMarkley at Datalux.com> wrote:
>
> > Does the version of SWAT in Samba version 2.2.1a RPMS work with Red Hat
> > 7.1??  I have followed the instructions in
> > http://samba.linuxbe.org/en/samba/learn/swat.html manual but it still
> > doesn't work.  Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Uh... how about telling us what is happening when you try to run it?
>
> [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type
> application/octet-stream which had a name of swat]
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>

Return-Path: <bryan4368 at yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from smtp011.mail.yahoo.com (smtp011.mail.yahoo.com
  [216.136.173.31]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03E8945CD
  for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 16:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs2428106-106.houston.rr.com (HELO win2k) (24.28.106.106)
  by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Jul 2001 23:33:10 -0000
X-Apparently-From: <bryan4368 at yahoo.com>
From: "Bryan" <bryan4368 at yahoo.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: newbie again: status error
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 18:34:21 -0500
Message-ID: <003301c11499$2b1012b0$6501a8c0 at win2k>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

when I run smbstatus I get an error of couldn't open status file
/var/lock/samba/status..lck.  What is this and how can I fix it

Thank You
Bryan Pershall
Desktop Support Specialist
Hm 713-983-6031
Cell 281-433-0530
e-mail: bryan4368 at yahoo.com


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


Return-Path: <nor at htmlcompendium.org>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from conductor.synapse.net (conductor.synapse.net
  [199.84.54.18]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87B6D420D
  for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 7554 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2001 20:21:40 -0000
Received: from ppp-44-62.ott.aei.net (HELO abner.htmlcompendium.org)
  (216.221.44.62) by conductor.synapse.net with SMTP; 24 Jul 2001
  20:21:40 -0000
Message-Id: <4.3.1.20010724161629.00d3fca0 at pop.synapse.net>
X-Sender: nor at pop.synapse.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 16:21:47 -0400
To: samba at lists.samba.org
From: Ron Woodall <nor at htmlcompendium.org>
Subject: help
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

Hi All:

	A bit of a problem here.

	I've been able to install and get running Samba over a 100 Mbps ethernet. 
I can ping all systems on the network and copy files back and forth. 
However, when I attempt to copy files to Linux/Samba box from a Win '98 box 
it is extremely slow and a period episodes of high collission rates. The 
copy command was issued on the Linux box. I'm also using Desbien as 
provided by Mandrake 7.2.

	Any help would be appreciated.

	Ron

Return-Path: <tridge at samba.org>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id EC99246BA;
  Tue, 24 Jul 2001 17:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Andrew Tridgell <tridge at valinux.com>
To: idra at samba.org
Cc: jojowil at hvcc.edu, samba at samba.org, samba-technical at samba.org
In-reply-to: <20010724133733.A4407 at va.samba.org> (idra at samba.org)
Subject: Re: rsync & smbpasswd
Reply-To: tridge at valinux.com
References: <Pine.A41.4.21.0107240920580.291880-100000 at academ.hvcc.edu>
  <20010724133733.A4407 at va.samba.org>
Message-Id: <20010725001215.EC99246BA at lists.samba.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 17:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

> if you fear that, simply make a script that rsync to a different file and then
> move that file over the correct one. A move is really fast (just changes one or two inodes)

rsync always does that. It creates a temporary file then when it has
confirmed the strong hash it renames it.

Return-Path: <oliver at samera.com.py>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from Polaris.Pla.net.PY (polaris.pla.net.py [216.250.196.10])
  by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31324238 for
  <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 18:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp at localhost) by Polaris.Pla.net.PY (8.11.2/8.11.2)
  with UUCP id f6OHIXI17334; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:18:33 +0400
Received: from samera.com.py (sojourner.samera.com [192.168.1.1]) by
  mpl.samera.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f6P15Hb02031; Tue, 24 Jul
  2001 21:05:17 -0400
Message-ID: <3B5E1B43.109 at samera.com.py>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:05:07 -0400
From: "Oliver Schulze L." <oliver at samera.com.py>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.1)
  Gecko/20010607 Netscape6/6.1b1
X-Accept-Language: es-py, es, en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bill Markley <BMarkley at Datalux.com>, Samba List
  <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Need help configuring SWAT
References: <AB802CEF9C2DD411AA9800A0C9E927E74B824F at datalux_exc>
  <3B58A178.3090207 at samera.com.py>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

Thats the problem,
you have samba installed from redhat and samba .org
Do this:
- backup your /etc/smb.conf
- rpm -ev samba-2.2.1a
- rpm -ev samba samba-client samba-common
- rpm -ivh samba-2.2.1a*rpm
- restore you /etc/smb.conf to /etc/samba/samba.conf

And you will be fine

Oliver

Oliver Schulze L. wrote:

> What does 'rpm -qa | grep samba' return?
> Do you enable swat in 'ntsysv' or by editing the file /etc/xinetd.d/swat?
>
> Oliver
>
> Bill Markley wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am having trouble getting Swat to run so that I can configure Samba 
>> in a
>> GUI.  I have Red Hat Linux version 7.1.  I downloaded Samba version 
>> 2.2.1a.
>> Samba has been compiled and the service will start or stop.  I have
>> configured SWAT according to a manual that I found (at
>> http://samba.linuxbe.org/en/samba/learn/swat.html ).  The document noted
>> that I was to do something different when using xinetd.  The 
>> procedure was
>> followed but I can't view the HTML SWAT front end configuration 
>> page.  The
>> error that is given is: The document contained no data. Try again 
>> later, or
>> contact the server's administrator.  This is a scary message for I am 
>> the
>> administrator....   Can anyone give me some direction so that I can
>> configure SWAT that it will allow me to configure Samba?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Bill
>>
>

-- 
Oliver Schulze L.
oliver at samera.com.py
Asuncion-Paraguay

Return-Path: <arfernando001 at hotmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from hotmail.com (f104.law15.hotmail.com [64.4.23.104]) by
  lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85FC54252 for
  <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 18:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft
  SMTPSVC; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 18:34:41 -0700
Received: from 151.202.120.169 by lw15fd.law15.hotmail.msn.com with
  HTTP;	Wed, 25 Jul 2001 01:34:41 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [151.202.120.169]
From: "arthur fernando" <arfernando001 at hotmail.com>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Samba upgrade 
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:34:41 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-ID: <F104idcDjoYAPNXRPmc000061c8 at hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jul 2001 01:34:41.0642 (UTC)
  FILETIME=[F9D244A0:01C114A9]
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from text/html by demime 0.98b
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

I have an older version of Samba (ver. 2.0.x) running on a Sparc solaris
server.  Information: Samba ver. 2.0.x is not installed in
</usr/local/samba> path. So what steps do I have to follow in upgrading
to Samba ver. 2.2.x? Should I select the default installation path when I
add a samba binary package? Do I have to "kill smbd/nmbd" daemons? Appreciate
all of your input. Thx.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

Return-Path: <Freeman.Peter at saugov.sa.gov.au>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from arnie.systems.sa.gov.au (arnie.systems.sa.gov.au
  [203.26.120.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40A644A8
  for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 18:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from arnie.systems.sa.gov.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
  arnie.systems.sa.gov.au OUTGOING (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA19556
  for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 11:14:11 +0930 (CST)'
Received: from sagemsbb006.saugov.sa.gov.au
  (sagemsbb006.saugov.sa.gov.au [143.216.59.14]) by
  arnie.systems.sa.gov.au INCOMING (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA19519
  for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 11:14:09 +0930 (CST)'
Received: by sagemsbb006.sagemsmrd01.sa.gov.au with Internet Mail
  Service (5.5.2653.19) id <3R4C5MN2>; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 11:14:05 +0930
Message-ID: <3390FF2B0DE0D21183B30008C70D751A08B9A998 at sagemsg0003.sagems
  mrd01.sa.gov.au>
From: "Freeman, Peter (ERHS)" <Freeman.Peter at saugov.sa.gov.au>
To: "Samba List (E-mail)" <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: DOS system bits / inherited permissions
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 11:14:01 +0930
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

I'm still having trouble with the Foxpro database as per my previous
post.  Last night I recreated the share from scratch & re-set all of 
the permissions on the files/directories in the affected share.

Now I have an interesting problem with the System bit being set on the
files in the Public share even tho the "Map System" parameter is set to
no. (ie: in the Windows properties of a file in this share, the System
property is ticked)

Also, any new files created in the share are given permissions of
"-rw-rw-r--",
even tho I've run "chmod -R 2770 dirname" on the affected directory.

I've stuck to Win95 clients while testing all this to ensure there's no
issues with Win2k as previously thought, once the 95 clients are working
i'll cross that bridge.

Can someone please enlighten me as to what is happening here, I've been 
staring at permission bits & smb.conf parameters all morning so the brain
isn't functioning normally, any extra pair(s) of eyes on the problem
might help. 

Thanks as usual.

(note: all the global parameters shown below are the same for the Public
share)

[Global]
<snip>
	create mask = 0770
	force create mode = 00
	security mask = 0777
	force security mode = 00
	directory mask = 0770
	force directory mode = 00
	directory security mask = 0777
	force directory security mode = 00
	inherit permissions = No
	map system = No
	map hidden = No
	map archive = Yes
</snip>


[Public]
	comment = Public Storage
	path = /storage/public
	valid users = @users
	force group = users
	read only = No
	inherit permissions = Yes

Return-Path: <drankin at cox-internet.com>
Delivered-To: samba at us5.samba.org
Received: from io.cox-internet.com (io-cox.cox-internet.com
  [208.180.118.41]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF964364
  for <samba at us5.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 18:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cox-internet.com ([66.76.40.151]) by io.cox-internet.com
  (InterMail vK.4.02.00.10 201-232-116-110 license
  dd72657b95c070b1853187e4f5a0d6a7) with ESMTP id
  <20010725020236.HQKI24924.io at cox-internet.com>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001
  21:02:36 -0500
Message-ID: <3B5E2908.B4FF5BD7 at cox-internet.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:03:52 -0500
From: David Rankin <drankin at cox-internet.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-NSCPCD  (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ron Woodall <nor at htmlcompendium.org>, Samba <samba at us5.samba.org>
Subject: Re: help
References: <4.3.1.20010724161629.00d3fca0 at pop.synapse.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

Ron Woodall wrote:

> Hi All:
>
>         A bit of a problem here.
>
>         I've been able to install and get running Samba over a 100 Mbps ethernet.
> I can ping all systems on the network and copy files back and forth.
> However, when I attempt to copy files to Linux/Samba box from a Win '98 box
> it is extremely slow and a period episodes of high collission rates. The
> copy command was issued on the Linux box. I'm also using Desbien as
> provided by Mandrake 7.2.
>
>         Any help would be appreciated.
>
>         Ron
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

This is a known, albeit intermittent problem. It has something to do with what has
been called "rabbit pellet packet fragmentation." I believe it is a timing issue with
the way TCP/IP packet size/responses are handled. I have had the same problem that
usually occurs when trying to copy files larger than 800k from Win95/98 to my samba
server (LM 7.2 w/ 2.2.19 kernel and samba 2.09) from within Windows Explorer. I
believe that MS has a patch that helps the problem, but I don't have the specifics at
hand. Do a search of the list archives on "slow copy windows to samba" and you should
find what your looking for. I know this issue got some attention before 2.2.1a was
released. For me, this problem drove me crazy only to disappear the next day. Best of
luck.


--
David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E.
ASEL -- Instrument
Nacogdoches, Texas
N31 34.7 W094 42.6
355 MSL

Return-Path: <drankin at cox-internet.com>
Delivered-To: samba at us5.samba.org
Received: from io.cox-internet.com (io-cox.cox-internet.com
  [208.180.118.41]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530BA4384
  for <samba at us5.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 19:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cox-internet.com ([66.76.40.151]) by io.cox-internet.com
  (InterMail vK.4.02.00.10 201-232-116-110 license
  dd72657b95c070b1853187e4f5a0d6a7) with ESMTP id
  <20010725024132.IGFE24924.io at cox-internet.com>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001
  21:41:32 -0500
Message-ID: <3B5E3228.843F40A8 at cox-internet.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:42:48 -0500
From: David Rankin <drankin at cox-internet.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-NSCPCD  (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Freeman, Peter (ERHS)" <Freeman.Peter at saugov.sa.gov.au>, Samba
  <samba at us5.samba.org>
Subject: Re: DOS system bits / inherited permissions
References: <3390FF2B0DE0D21183B30008C70D751A08B9A998 at sagemsg0003.sagems
  mrd01.sa.gov.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

"Freeman, Peter (ERHS)" wrote:

> I'm still having trouble with the Foxpro database as per my previous
> post.  Last night I recreated the share from scratch & re-set all of
> the permissions on the files/directories in the affected share.
>
> Now I have an interesting problem with the System bit being set on the
> files in the Public share even tho the "Map System" parameter is set to
> no. (ie: in the Windows properties of a file in this share, the System
> property is ticked)
>
> Also, any new files created in the share are given permissions of
> "-rw-rw-r--",
> even tho I've run "chmod -R 2770 dirname" on the affected directory.
>
> I've stuck to Win95 clients while testing all this to ensure there's no
> issues with Win2k as previously thought, once the 95 clients are working
> i'll cross that bridge.
>
> Can someone please enlighten me as to what is happening here, I've been
> staring at permission bits & smb.conf parameters all morning so the brain
> isn't functioning normally, any extra pair(s) of eyes on the problem
> might help.
>
> Thanks as usual.
>
> (note: all the global parameters shown below are the same for the Public
> share)
>
> [Global]
> <snip>
>         create mask = 0770
>         force create mode = 00
>         security mask = 0777
>         force security mode = 00
>         directory mask = 0770
>         force directory mode = 00
>         directory security mask = 0777
>         force directory security mode = 00
>         inherit permissions = No
>         map system = No
>         map hidden = No
>         map archive = Yes
> </snip>
>
> [Public]
>         comment = Public Storage
>         path = /storage/public
>         valid users = @users
>         force group = users
>         read only = No
>         inherit permissions = Yes
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

The only thing I can suggest is to see:

    http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba/chapter/book/ch05_03.html

    It does a great job explaining the DOS/unix file permission bit mappings.
I run multi user application from my samba share and I haven't had problems
with MS access, outlook, quickbooks, etc.. (Oh - I have had MS access
problems, but they have nothing to do with samba) I haven't used fox pro.

    I have included my smb.conf share entries below for your review. The only
differences seem to be whether the map archive is set globally or on a per
share basis. I really question whether you want your force create mode/mask,
directory mode/mask set globally instead of on a per share basis. I have
included my global settings below as well. I'm running LM 7.2 on the 2.2.19
kernel, Samba 2.09. (I still can't get 2.2.1a to install due to dependency
problems with the src.rpm -- but I will ; )

[global]
 workgroup = RB_LAW
 server string = RB_LAW Samba Server %v
 encrypt passwords = Yes
 update encrypted = Yes
 smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd
 passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
 passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *success*
 passwd chat debug = Yes
 unix password sync = Yes
 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
 max log size = 50
 name resolve order = wins lmhosts hosts bcast
 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
 printcap name = lpstat
 logon script = %U.bat
 domain logons = Yes
 time server = yes
 os level = 34
 preferred master = Yes
 domain master = Yes
 dns proxy = No
 wins support = Yes
 hosts allow = 192.168.7. localhost
 min print space = 2000
 printing = cups
 print command = /usr/bin/lp -d%p -oraw %s; rm %s
 lpq command = /usr/bin/lpstat -o%p
 lprm command = /usr/bin/cancel %p-%j
 queuepause command = /usr/bin/disable %p
 queueresume command = /usr/bin/enable %p

[Rankin-Bertin]
 comment = Rankin-Bertin PLLC
 path = /home/samba/rbpllc
 valid users = @rbpllc
 force group = rbpllc
 admin users = david
 writeable = Yes
 map archive = Yes
 inherit permissions = Yes

--
David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E.
ASEL -- Instrument
Nacogdoches, Texas
N31 34.7 W094 42.6
355 MSL

Return-Path: <MMadan at novell.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from prv-mail25.provo.novell.com (prv-mail25.provo.novell.com
  [137.65.81.121]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4CF4456
  for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 20:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from INET-PRV1-MTA by prv-mail25.provo.novell.com with
  Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:17:04 -0600
Message-Id: <sb5de5d0.049 at prv-mail25.provo.novell.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.0
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:09:04 -0600
From: "Manish Madan" <MMadan at novell.com>
To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Upgrading to 2.2.1a didn't solve the network problem
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

Hi,

      I have not been keeping myself up to date with this particular stream of
mails, but just a thought. Sometimes, over the network, an OS will assume that
a packet (file) has been "written" soon as it sends the packet on the wire.
Doesn't wait for confirmation of receipt etc. Whereas "reads" are complete
only when you receive the whole thing. Could this be part of the problem ? I
don't know why the server stalls though.

>>> William Jojo <jojowil at hvcc.edu> 07/24/01 07:16PM >>>
Spyros,

Does this happen if you ftp? I'm curious as to why you have faster writes
than reads as this is backwards from the expected behaviour (even for
NFS). What raid level are you using (1 vs 5)? and what are your settings
for "read size" and "read raw".

I'm assuming you have 100Mbit Full-Duplex given your write rates, but are
oplocks on and do you have "write cache size" set to a value other than 0
(which would account for your dramatic write rate given a raid setup)?

also what are your tcp send and receive default values for Linux and do
you have anything set for "socket options"?


Bill

On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Spyros Ioakim wrote:

> I upgraded to 2.2.1a from 2.0.10 but still the network problem persists.
> I will copy a file from the samba server (HP Netserver LC2000 / Netraid
> 1Si running Redhat 7.1) at a rate of 2-4 mbytes/sec but when I write a
> file to the samba server it will upload at 9 mbytes/sec.
> If I have lots of files to copy to the server(megabytes) samba will
> stall (affecting all network clients) and resume after 10-15 secs.
>
> Any idea on what might cause that?
> Any idea on how to trace this?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Spyros
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Return-Path: <freyes at inch.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from koza.acecape.com (koza2.acecape.com [66.9.36.222]) by
  lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7A245A1 for
  <samba at samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miguel (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by
  koza.acecape.com (8.10.1/8.9.3) with SMTP id f6P46Y909095; Wed, 25 Jul
  2001 00:06:35 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200107250406.f6P46Y909095 at koza.acecape.com>
From: "Francisco Reyes" <freyes at inch.com>
To: "Eagen, Dave" <eagen at BIPERF.com>, "samba at samba.org"
  <samba at samba.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 00:09:10 -0400
Reply-To: "Francisco Reyes" <freyes at inch.com>
Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.10.2010) For Windows 2000
  (5.0.2195;1)
In-Reply-To: <1A89719E0087D211A1C40010E37C177C032E5F18 at mail2.biperf.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Samba and Windows timestamps
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

On Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:33:02 -0500, Eagen, Dave wrote:

>We'd like to force Samba to use the current unix time whenever a change is
>made to a file. For example, if we are copying a file from a Windows box to
>the unix box and the windows file timestamp is 13:40 but we are copying the
>file at 13:50, we want the timestamp on the samba server to be 13:50. This
>will allow some scripts we have to work that depend on file age.
>
>Is this possible to do? 

Just "upgrade" to 2.2
This is the behavior I have experience on 2.2. For me it was a
problem so I went back to the latest pre 2.2 version.

For example I had files from a few days old to months old. I
wanted to copy them to the Samba server and then archive them in
different gzipped files according to their time stamp. On 2.2
ALL files go the time when they were copied. On pre 2.2 the
files would retain their times.

Return-Path: <git at meaford.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from Sabrina.mydomain (unknown [207.61.5.187]) by
  lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1DC421B for
  <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:07:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (rashkae at localhost) by Sabrina.mydomain
  (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f6P4Bjq32709; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 00:11:46
  -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: Sabrina.mydomain: rashkae owned process doing
  -bs
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 00:11:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Rashkae <git at meaford.com>
X-X-Sender: <rashkae at Sabrina.mydomain>
To: Ron Woodall <nor at htmlcompendium.org>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: help
In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.20010724161629.00d3fca0 at pop.synapse.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107250010200.22475-100000 at Sabrina.mydomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

Sounds like network config on the Debian box. In particular, I would
suspect Linux has configured the NIC to opperate in Full Duplex. (or is
operating at 10 mbps instead of 100)

Check performance with FTP to confirm whether or not this is networking or
Samba issue.


On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Ron Woodall wrote:

> Hi All:
>
> 	A bit of a problem here.
>
> 	I've been able to install and get running Samba over a 100 Mbps ethernet.
> I can ping all systems on the network and copy files back and forth.
> However, when I attempt to copy files to Linux/Samba box from a Win '98 box
> it is extremely slow and a period episodes of high collission rates. The
> copy command was issued on the Linux box. I'm also using Desbien as
> provided by Mandrake 7.2.
>
> 	Any help would be appreciated.
>
> 	Ron
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>

Return-Path: <drankin at cox-internet.com>
Delivered-To: samba at us5.samba.org
Received: from europa.cox-internet.com (europa-cox.cox-internet.com
  [208.180.118.40]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C04964587
  for <samba at us5.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cox-internet.com ([66.76.40.151]) by
  europa.cox-internet.com (InterMail vK.4.02.00.10 201-232-116-110
  license dd72657b95c070b1853187e4f5a0d6a7) with ESMTP id
  <20010725041816.FVNX24301.europa at cox-internet.com>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001
  23:18:16 -0500
Message-ID: <3B5E4927.5E171EED at cox-internet.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 23:20:55 -0500
From: root <drankin at cox-internet.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-4.1mdk i586)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Samba <samba at us5.samba.org>, mandrake <expert at linux-mandrake.com>
Subject: Upgrading LM 7.2 Samba 2.09 to Samba 2.2.1a Impossible?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

Ok, Mandrake experts and Samba crew:

	Were going to get to the bottom of this ; ) (At least for my
etification and hopefully others). The problem is simple, I have a test
machine (mirror to my real server) that I wan't to upgrade from Samba
2.09 to 2.2.1a. Mandrake 7.2 with 2.2.19 kernel is the current version.
No, there hasn't been a pressing need for me to try LM 8.0, I use the
7.2 server as the only server for 5 WinXX clients and it does ssh, ftp,
telnet, http (and htpts), pptp vpn, pop3, imap, and telnet quite nicely.
Don't have NT or Win2K, never have, and probably never will. I may need
trust relationships between a NT domain and my office in the future, but
that is another fish to fry.

	The problem - How in the HECK do I get Samba 2.2.1a to install over my
current setup. You guys are awesome, but I'm not upgrading to  LM 8.0
just to get Samba 2.2.1a to install. (period) I'm a stupid lawyer and
professional engineer (aero) and don't have the time to devote to a
complete version change at the moment. (numerous reasons - parenthood
the most pressing). (Brandon hold your comments young man -- we'll talk
later)

	Background, I can't get Samba 2.2.1a to install from the Mandrake rpm
over my current setup. Specifically, the samba-2.2.1a-4mdk.i586.rpm,
samba-client-2.2.1a-4mdk.i586.rpm, and samba-common-2.2.1a-4mdk.i586.rpm
will not install over my present setup. I get dependency errors
concerning:

pam-devel-0.72-12mdk; (I installed pam-devel-0.72-12mdk and fixed this);
but installing from the src.rpm, I get

Installing samba-2_2_1a-4mdk_src.rpm
error: failed build dependencies:
        libcups-devel is needed by samba-2.2.1a-4mdk

OK, that being so, I downloaded all of the cups upgrades;

cups-1_1_9-4mdk_i586.rpm*
cups-drivers-1_0-31mdk_i586.rpm*
libcups1-devel-1_1_9-4mdk_i586.rpm*
cups-common-1_1_9-4mdk_i586.rpm*
libcups1-1_1_9-4mdk_i586.rpm* 

and tried to upgrade cups, but;

[root at Skyline cups]# rpm -Uvh cups*
error: failed dependencies:
        libcups1 >= 1.1.9-4mdk is needed by cups-1.1.9-4mdk
        libcups.so.2   is needed by cups-1.1.9-4mdk
        libcupsimage.so.2   is needed by cups-1.1.9-4mdk
        libcups1 >= 1.1.9-4mdk is needed by cups-common-1.1.9-4mdk
        libcups.so.2   is needed by cups-common-1.1.9-4mdk
        libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2)   is needed by cups-common-1.1.9-4mdk
        ghostscript >= 5.50-65mdk is needed by cups-drivers-1.0-31mdk
        libcups.so.2 is needed by cups-drivers-1.0-31mdk
        libcupsimage.so.2 is needed by cups-drivers-1.0-31mdk
        libcups.so.2 is needed by samba-client-2.0.9-1.1mdk
        libcups.so.2 is needed by samba-common-2.0.9-1.1mdk
        libcups.so.2 is needed by xpp-0.6-16mdk
        libcups.so.2 is needed by samba-2.0.9-1.1mdk

I have tried installing the libcups packages first -- to no avail; see
below:

[root at Skyline cups]# rpm -Uvh lib*
error: failed dependencies:
        openssl-devel is needed by libcups1-devel-1.1.9-4mdk

So I'm at a quandry -- Where am I going wrong. I have read about many
successful installs of 2.2.1a over LM 7.2, what I want know is -- How
did you do it? Any help will be greatly appreciated. I just love getting
to bed before 0200, and if I get this solved, I probably will.


-- 
David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E.
ASEL -- Instrument
Nacogdoches, Texas
N31 34.7 W094 42.6
355 MSL

Return-Path: <mdt-tech-mailbox at home.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from femail21.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail21.sdc1.sfba.home.com
  [24.0.95.146]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB1245BA
  for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:47:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GANDALF ([24.79.118.100]) by femail21.sdc1.sfba.home.com
  (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id
  <20010725045209.MYRI501.femail21.sdc1.sfba.home.com at GANDALF> for
  <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:52:09 -0700
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:47:47 -0700
To: samba at lists.samba.org
From: Mike Traynor <mdt-tech-mailbox at home.com>
Subject: Password problem ... what am I doing wrong?
X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <20010725045209.MYRI501.femail21.sdc1.sfba.home.com at GANDALF>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

I've been struggling for a while and need some help.  Can't get samba to authenticate 
plain text username/password pairs.  Details:

redhat 7.0 on intel x86
samba 2.2.1a
./configure --with-pam --with-pam_smbpass
smb.conf **no** encrypted passwords
registries of win98 clients edited to allow plain text passwords
all users added to /usr/../smbpasswd using smbpasswd -a command

/etc/pam.d/samba looks like this:

authrequired/lib/security/pam_smbpass.so nodelay
accountrequired/lib/security/pam_pwdb.so audit nodelay
sessionrequired/lib/security/pam_pwdb.so nodelay
passwordrequired/lib/security/pam_smbpass.so nodelay\
smbconf=/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf

output of smbclient -L localhost -U [user] looks like this:

added interface ip=192.168.1.1 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 session setup 
failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password pair in a Tree Connect or 
Session Setup are invalid.)

win98 clients tell me password is incorrect when I try to authenticate to domain via 
samba server.

log.[host] file in /usr/../samba/var looks like this after a **single** failed attempt 
at authentication from [host]:

[2001/07/24 22:10:11, 0] passdb/pampass.c:smb_pam_auth(541)
  smb_pam_auth: PAM: UNKNOWN ERROR while authenticating user mdt
[2001/07/24 22:10:11, 0] passdb/pampass.c:smb_pam_passcheck(830)
  smb_pam_passcheck: PAM: smb_pam_auth failed - Rejecting User mdt !
[2001/07/24 22:10:11, 0] passdb/pampass.c:smb_pam_auth(541)
  smb_pam_auth: PAM: UNKNOWN ERROR while authenticating user mdt
[2001/07/24 22:10:11, 0] passdb/pampass.c:smb_pam_passcheck(830)
  smb_pam_passcheck: PAM: smb_pam_auth failed - Rejecting User mdt !

Any ideas?  Anybody?

Thanks,

Mike.

Return-Path: <php_list at citiz.net>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from up.zw.stockway.net (unknown [202.101.25.49]) by
  lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1545A462C for
  <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 22:06:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from catoc (catoc.zw.stockway.net [192.168.0.21]) by
  up.zw.stockway.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B1617F403 for
  <samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 13:11:34 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 13:12:41 +0800
From: php_list <php_list at citiz.net>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53d)
Reply-To: php_list <php_list at citiz.net>
Message-ID: <4759414303.20010725131241 at citiz.net>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: help! How to disable smbmount cache?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

Hello samba,

  My linuxbox is Mandrake 8.0, Use samba-common-2.2x.rpm and
  samba-client-2.2x.rpm.
  I use 'smbmount' mount other machine(windows2000 server) shared
  folder at my linux. I got this problem:
  I have file "realtime.txt" at win2k, some programm open it, and
  change it, 4000 times in 1 second and not close it. I have another
  programm run linuxbox open the file "realtime.txt", only read it.
  Now, ???, file not change! Then I remount it, it change, but only
  change once.
  Plase help me.
  Sorry for my english poor.
-- 
Best regards,
 php_list                          mailto:php_list at citiz.net

Return-Path: <dragos.delcea at farmexim.ro>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.farmexim.ro (mail.farmexim.ro [193.230.163.129]) by
  lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F33E45F5 for
  <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 22:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 31649 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2001 05:45:49 -0000
Received: from dragosd.farmexim.ro (HELO farmexim.ro) (192.168.1.60) by
  192.168.1.3 with SMTP; 25 Jul 2001 05:45:49 -0000
Message-ID: <3B5E5D7D.5027DC27 at farmexim.ro>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 08:47:41 +0300
From: Dragos Delcea <dragos.delcea at farmexim.ro>
Organization: Farmexim SA
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.6 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en, ro
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mike Traynor <mdt-tech-mailbox at home.com>
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Password problem ... what am I doing wrong?
References: <20010725045209.MYRI501.femail21.sdc1.sfba.home.com at GANDALF>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

hello,
as far as I can tell, it should work, because it's the same setup as 
mine, and mine's working the only difference beeing that I added
the users first as unix users (I hope the user you are adding with 
smbpasswd -a exists as a unix user -it needs the UID-) and then used
the mksmbpasswd.sh script to generate the smbpasswd file

dragos

Mike Traynor wrote:
> 
> I've been struggling for a while and need some help.  Can't get samba to authenticate
> plain text username/password pairs.  Details:
> 
> redhat 7.0 on intel x86
> samba 2.2.1a
> ./configure --with-pam --with-pam_smbpass
> smb.conf **no** encrypted passwords
> registries of win98 clients edited to allow plain text passwords
> all users added to /usr/../smbpasswd using smbpasswd -a command
> 
> /etc/pam.d/samba looks like this:
> 
> authrequired/lib/security/pam_smbpass.so nodelay
> accountrequired/lib/security/pam_pwdb.so audit nodelay
> sessionrequired/lib/security/pam_pwdb.so nodelay
> passwordrequired/lib/security/pam_smbpass.so nodelay\
> smbconf=/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf
> 
> output of smbclient -L localhost -U [user] looks like this:
> 
> added interface ip=192.168.1.1 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 session setup
> failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password pair in a Tree Connect or
> Session Setup are invalid.)
> 
> win98 clients tell me password is incorrect when I try to authenticate to domain via
> samba server.
> 
> log.[host] file in /usr/../samba/var looks like this after a **single** failed attempt
> at authentication from [host]:
> 
> [2001/07/24 22:10:11, 0] passdb/pampass.c:smb_pam_auth(541)
>   smb_pam_auth: PAM: UNKNOWN ERROR while authenticating user mdt
> [2001/07/24 22:10:11, 0] passdb/pampass.c:smb_pam_passcheck(830)
>   smb_pam_passcheck: PAM: smb_pam_auth failed - Rejecting User mdt !
> [2001/07/24 22:10:11, 0] passdb/pampass.c:smb_pam_auth(541)
>   smb_pam_auth: PAM: UNKNOWN ERROR while authenticating user mdt
> [2001/07/24 22:10:11, 0] passdb/pampass.c:smb_pam_passcheck(830)
>   smb_pam_passcheck: PAM: smb_pam_auth failed - Rejecting User mdt !
> 
> Any ideas?  Anybody?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mike.

Return-Path: <mdt-tech-mailbox at home.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com
  [24.0.95.84]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15F4421B for
  <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 22:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GANDALF ([24.79.118.100]) by femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com
  (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id
  <20010725060107.PBWP17902.femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com at GANDALF>; Tue, 24
  Jul 2001 23:01:07 -0700
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 22:56:44 -0700
To: Dragos Delcea <dragos.delcea at farmexim.ro>
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
From: Mike Traynor <mdt-tech-mailbox at home.com>
Subject: Re: Password problem ... what am I doing wrong?
X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <20010725060107.PBWP17902.femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com at GANDALF
  >
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

Dragos,

The users do indeed exist on the unix system.  In fact, the smbpasswd command will not 
let you add a user that does not already exist in the standard unix password file.

Mike.

7/24/01 10:47:41 PM, Dragos Delcea <dragos.delcea at farmexim.ro> wrote:

>hello,
>as far as I can tell, it should work, because it's the same setup as 
>mine, and mine's working the only difference beeing that I added
>the users first as unix users (I hope the user you are adding with 
>smbpasswd -a exists as a unix user -it needs the UID-) and then used
>the mksmbpasswd.sh script to generate the smbpasswd file
>
>dragos
>
>Mike Traynor wrote:
>> 
>> I've been struggling for a while and need some help.  Can't get samba to 
authenticate
>> plain text username/password pairs.  Details:
>> 
>> redhat 7.0 on intel x86
>> samba 2.2.1a
>> ./configure --with-pam --with-pam_smbpass
>> smb.conf **no** encrypted passwords
>> registries of win98 clients edited to allow plain text passwords
>> all users added to /usr/../smbpasswd using smbpasswd -a command
>> 
>> /etc/pam.d/samba looks like this:
>> 
>> authrequired/lib/security/pam_smbpass.so nodelay
>> accountrequired/lib/security/pam_pwdb.so audit nodelay
>> sessionrequired/lib/security/pam_pwdb.so nodelay
>> passwordrequired/lib/security/pam_smbpass.so nodelay\
>> smbconf=/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf
>> 
>> output of smbclient -L localhost -U [user] looks like this:
>> 
>> added interface ip=192.168.1.1 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 session 
setup
>> failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password pair in a Tree Connect or
>> Session Setup are invalid.)
>> 
>> win98 clients tell me password is incorrect when I try to authenticate to domain 
via
>> samba server.
>> 
>> log.[host] file in /usr/../samba/var looks like this after a **single** failed 
attempt
>> at authentication from [host]:
>> 
>> [2001/07/24 22:10:11, 0] passdb/pampass.c:smb_pam_auth(541)
>>   smb_pam_auth: PAM: UNKNOWN ERROR while authenticating user mdt
>> [2001/07/24 22:10:11, 0] passdb/pampass.c:smb_pam_passcheck(830)
>>   smb_pam_passcheck: PAM: smb_pam_auth failed - Rejecting User mdt !
>> [2001/07/24 22:10:11, 0] passdb/pampass.c:smb_pam_auth(541)
>>   smb_pam_auth: PAM: UNKNOWN ERROR while authenticating user mdt
>> [2001/07/24 22:10:11, 0] passdb/pampass.c:smb_pam_passcheck(830)
>>   smb_pam_passcheck: PAM: smb_pam_auth failed - Rejecting User mdt !
>> 
>> Any ideas?  Anybody?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Mike.
>-- 
>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>

Return-Path: <sioakim at ace-hellas.gr>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from atlas.ace-hellas.gr (atlas.ace-hellas.gr [195.97.19.130])
  by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3FB47FA for
  <samba at samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 23:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spyrosvl4 (spyros-vl4.ace-internal.gr [192.168.2.4]) by
  atlas.ace-hellas.gr (8.11.2/linuxconf) with ESMTP id f6P6Ns729977;
  Wed, 25 Jul 2001 09:23:54 +0300
From: "Spyros Ioakim" <sioakim at ace-hellas.gr>
To: "'William Jojo'" <jojowil at hvcc.edu>
Cc: <David.Collier-Brown at sun.com>, <samba at samba.org>
Subject: RE: Upgrading to 2.2.1a didn't solve the network problem
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 09:23:50 +0300
Message-ID: <000001c114d2$5f2766f0$0402a8c0 at aceinternal.gr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.21.0107241448150.280634-100000 at academ.hvcc.edu>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

[global]
        client code page = 737
        workgroup = ACE
        netbios name = ACESRV
        netbios aliases = POSIDON
        server string = HP NetServer LC 2000
        encrypt passwords = Yes
        log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
        max log size = 50
        local master = No
        wins support = Yes
        kernel oplocks = No
        hosts allow = 192.168.2. 127.

Test results for same 101mb file
Samba read: 43 secs
Samba write: 31 secs (with stall)
Idle cpu during the stall was at 10%.

I'm suspecting that the problem might not be samba specific but bdflush
or raid controller specific.
Maybe upgrading the controller firmware will fix that?

I hope that flashing the controller will not destroy the raid
configuration and lose the raid setup.

Thanks,
Spyros

-----Original Message-----
From: William Jojo [mailto:jojowil at hvcc.edu] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 9:49 PM
To: Spyros Ioakim
Cc: David.Collier-Brown at sun.com; samba at samba.org
Subject: RE: Upgrading to 2.2.1a didn't solve the network problem


just out of curiousity....have you tried disabling kernel oplocks and
retry?

Bill


On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Spyros Ioakim wrote:

> Forgot to mention that right after I wrote the file samba stalled for
> about 2 secs.
> This happened with the samba copy and NOT with the ftp put.
> 
>   8:47pm  up 2 days, 8 min,  2 users,  load average: 0.28, 0.74, 0.48
> 95 processes: 92 sleeping, 3 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
> CPU states:  6.0% user,  3.1% system,  0.0% nice, 16.5% idle
> Mem:   641748K av,  640168K used,    1580K free,       4K shrd,
30996K
> buff
> Swap: 2096440K av,    1284K used, 2095156K free
547268K
> cached
> 
>   PID USER     PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM   TIME COMMAND
>     3 root      20   0     0    0     0 RW   21.7  0.0   3:52 kswapd
> 14766 sioakim   11   0  2468 2468  1864 S    17.2  0.3   0:38 smbd
>     5 root      17   0     0    0     0 RW   16.3  0.0   3:22 bdflush
> 
> sometimes cpu idle is 1-2%.
> 
> 
> Dns lookup seems to be very fast... never had problems with that...
> 
> wins support = Yes
> 
> Thanks,
> Spyros
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: davecb at scot.canada.sun.com [mailto:davecb at scot.canada.sun.com]
On
> Behalf Of David Collier-Brown
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 8:09 PM
> To: Spyros Ioakim
> Cc: David.Collier-Brown at sun.com; samba at samba.org
> Subject: Re: Upgrading to 2.2.1a didn't solve the network problem
> 
> Spyros Ioakim wrote:
> > 
> > Test result for a 101MB file:
> > 
> > Samba read: 44 secs
> > Samba write: 17 secs
> > ftp read: 14 secs
> > ftp write: 17 secs
> 
> 	Ok, that looks samba-specific!
> 
> > I copied another file and while copying I clicked cancel and got
this
> in
> > the logs:
> > [2001/07/24 19:37:36, 0] smbd/oplock.c:remove_oplock(232)
> >   remove_oplock: failed to remove share oplock for file w2ksp2.exe
> fnum
> > 10562, dev = 801, inode = 163898
> > [2001/07/24 19:37:36, 0] smbd/reply.c:reply_lockingX(4406)
> >   reply_lockingX: error in removing oplock on file w2ksp2.exe
> > 
> > Does the above provide any help?
> 
> 	I'm not sure: samba-techies, is this a symptom
> 	you recognize?
> 
> 	Its time to look at WINS and DNS next: do you have WINS
> 	turned on, and does your DNS return quickly when 
> 	exercised via telnet or ftp?
> 
> --dave
> -- 
> David Collier-Brown,           | Always do right. This will gratify 
> Performance & Engineering Team | some people and astonish the rest.
> Americas Customer Engineering  |                      -- Mark Twain
> (905) 415-2849                 | davecb at canada.sun.com
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> 

Return-Path: <dragos.delcea at farmexim.ro>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.farmexim.ro (mail.farmexim.ro [193.230.163.129]) by
  lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D68AF44FB for
  <samba at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 23:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 7426 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2001 06:29:57 -0000
Received: from dragosd.farmexim.ro (HELO farmexim.ro) (192.168.1.60) by
  192.168.1.3 with SMTP; 25 Jul 2001 06:29:57 -0000
Message-ID: <3B5E67D5.8E8E661C at farmexim.ro>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 09:31:49 +0300
From: Dragos Delcea <dragos.delcea at farmexim.ro>
Organization: Farmexim SA
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.6 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en, ro
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mike Traynor <mdt-tech-mailbox at home.com>
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Password problem ... what am I doing wrong?
References: <20010725060107.PBWP17902.femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com at GANDALF
  >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

Mike,

maybe we should look somewhere else:
check the permisions:
dr-x------    2 root     root         4096 Jul 24 12:32
/usr/local/samba/private/
-rw-------    1 root     root         9086 Jul 24 16:08
/usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd 
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root          265 Jul 13 12:38
/etc/pam.d/samba
also, as you posted your /etc/pam.d/samba it looks that you need to
add some 
spaces:
----------
#%PAM-1.0
auth            required        /lib/security/pam_smbpass.so nodelay
account         required        /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so audit
nodelay
session         required        /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so nodelay
password        required        /lib/security/pam_smbpass.so
nodelay\ smbconf=/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf      
-----------
also check if you removed the samba rpm which came with redhat;
start your daemons with full path: 
/usr/local/samba/bin/smbd -D -s /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf
/usr/local/samba/bin/nmbd -D -s /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf
check your smb.conf to have encrypt passwords = no (default is yes)
have you had a client that worked with plain text passwords (with
another server)?
for me it was easy as the old server used plain text passwords, and
I knew for
sure that all clients do.

good luck,
dragos

Mike Traynor wrote:
> 
> Dragos,
> 
> The users do indeed exist on the unix system.  In fact, the smbpasswd command will not
> let you add a user that does not already exist in the standard unix password file.
> 
> Mike.
> 
> 7/24/01 10:47:41 PM, Dragos Delcea <dragos.delcea at farmexim.ro> wrote:
> 
> >hello,
> >as far as I can tell, it should work, because it's the same setup as
> >mine, and mine's working the only difference beeing that I added
> >the users first as unix users (I hope the user you are adding with
> >smbpasswd -a exists as a unix user -it needs the UID-) and then used
> >the mksmbpasswd.sh script to generate the smbpasswd file
> >
> >dragos

Return-Path: <opjose at ex-pressnet.com>
Delivered-To: samba at us5.samba.org
Received: from pop03.ex-pressnet.com (unknown [24.239.0.10]) by
  lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F4F4BA0 for
  <samba at us5.samba.org>; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 00:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from whopper ([24.239.25.86]) by pop03.ex-pressnet.com  with
  Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.117.11); Wed, 25 Jul 2001 02:53:20 -0400
Reply-To: <opjose at ex-pressnet.com>
From: "Jose M. Sanchez" <opjose at ex-pressnet.com>
To: "'root'" <drankin at cox-internet.com>, "'Samba'"
  <samba at us5.samba.org>, "'mandrake'" <expert at linux-mandrake.com>
Subject: RE: [expert] Upgrading LM 7.2 Samba 2.09 to Samba 2.2.1a
  Impossible?
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 03:12:55 -0400
Organization: Net Results, Inc.
Message-ID: <002c01c114d9$3a4147a0$3200000a at netrslts.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616
In-Reply-To: <3B5E4927.5E171EED at cox-internet.com>
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

Root? Root you say???

By installing/recompiling via the SRC.RPM's you are effectively trying
to recreate the application/library tree that Samba uses under 8.0.

This gets you into the upgrade black hole as you've discovered.

You might want to instead, download the Tarball.

This will permit you to run the configuration script ("./configure")
that SHOULD generate a makefile better suited to what is currently
installed on your system.

Granted that this will break even more dependencies for you, since you
are effectively bypassing RPM's (rather weak) defenses, but at least you
might get a good compile & install.

For safety's sake, grab the pre-compiled RPM and query it to see where
it tends to put things.

You'll want to use some of the ./configure options (such as --targetdir=
or the like) to get things to go into the same directory structure as
the SRC.RPM's. You'll avoid problems later this way.

-JMS
opjose at ex-pressnet.com

-----Original Message-----
From: root at mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com
[mailto:root at mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com] On Behalf Of root
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 12:21 AM
To: Samba; mandrake
Subject: [expert] Upgrading LM 7.2 Samba 2.09 to Samba 2.2.1a
Impossible?


Ok, Mandrake experts and Samba crew:

	Were going to get to the bottom of this ; ) (At least for my
etification and hopefully others). The problem is simple, I have a test
machine (mirror to my real server) that I wan't to upgrade from Samba
2.09 to 2.2.1a. Mandrake 7.2 with 2.2.19 kernel is the current version.
No, there hasn't been a pressing need for me to try LM 8.0, I use the
7.2 server as the only server for 5 WinXX clients and it does ssh, ftp,
telnet, http (and htpts), pptp vpn, pop3, imap, and telnet quite nicely.
Don't have NT or Win2K, never have, and probably never will. I may need
trust relationships between a NT domain and my office in the future, but
that is another fish to fry.

	The problem - How in the HECK do I get Samba 2.2.1a to install
over my current setup. You guys are awesome, but I'm not upgrading to
LM 8.0 just to get Samba 2.2.1a to install. (period) I'm a stupid lawyer
and professional engineer (aero) and don't have the time to devote to a
complete version change at the moment. (numerous reasons - parenthood
the most pressing). (Brandon hold your comments young man -- we'll talk
later)

	Background, I can't get Samba 2.2.1a to install from the
Mandrake rpm over my current setup. Specifically, the
samba-2.2.1a-4mdk.i586.rpm, samba-client-2.2.1a-4mdk.i586.rpm, and
samba-common-2.2.1a-4mdk.i586.rpm will not install over my present
setup. I get dependency errors
concerning:

pam-devel-0.72-12mdk; (I installed pam-devel-0.72-12mdk and fixed this);
but installing from the src.rpm, I get

Installing samba-2_2_1a-4mdk_src.rpm
error: failed build dependencies:
        libcups-devel is needed by samba-2.2.1a-4mdk

OK, that being so, I downloaded all of the cups upgrades;

cups-1_1_9-4mdk_i586.rpm*
cups-drivers-1_0-31mdk_i586.rpm*
libcups1-devel-1_1_9-4mdk_i586.rpm*
cups-common-1_1_9-4mdk_i586.rpm*
libcups1-1_1_9-4mdk_i586.rpm* 

and tried to upgrade cups, but;

[root at Skyline cups]# rpm -Uvh cups*
error: failed dependencies:
        libcups1 >= 1.1.9-4mdk is needed by cups-1.1.9-4mdk
        libcups.so.2   is needed by cups-1.1.9-4mdk
        libcupsimage.so.2   is needed by cups-1.1.9-4mdk
        libcups1 >= 1.1.9-4mdk is needed by cups-common-1.1.9-4mdk
        libcups.so.2   is needed by cups-common-1.1.9-4mdk
        libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2)   is needed by cups-common-1.1.9-4mdk
        ghostscript >= 5.50-65mdk is needed by cups-drivers-1.0-31mdk
        libcups.so.2 is needed by cups-drivers-1.0-31mdk
        libcupsimage.so.2 is needed by cups-drivers-1.0-31mdk
        libcups.so.2 is needed by samba-client-2.0.9-1.1mdk
        libcups.so.2 is needed by samba-common-2.0.9-1.1mdk
        libcups.so.2 is needed by xpp-0.6-16mdk
        libcups.so.2 is needed by samba-2.0.9-1.1mdk

I have tried installing the libcups packages first -- to no avail; see
below:

[root at Skyline cups]# rpm -Uvh lib*
error: failed dependencies:
        openssl-devel is needed by libcups1-devel-1.1.9-4mdk

So I'm at a quandry -- Where am I going wrong. I have read about many
successful installs of 2.2.1a over LM 7.2, what I want know is -- How
did you do it? Any help will be greatly appreciated. I just love getting
to bed before 0200, and if I get this solved, I probably will.


-- 
David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E.
ASEL -- Instrument
Nacogdoches, Texas
N31 34.7 W094 42.6
355 MSL

Return-Path: <jf_zhuang at 21cn.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from 21cn.com (unknown [61.140.60.248]) by lists.samba.org
  (Postfix) with SMTP id 2108749E2 for <samba at samba.org>; Wed, 25 Jul
  2001 00:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 21cn.com([10.2.2.3]) by 21cn.com(AIMC 2.9.5.2) with SMTP
  id jm73b5ec54d; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 15:43:37 +0800
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <Zt989274845663.10261 at webmail3.inner-21cn.com>
X-AIMailer: AIMC 2.9.5.1 2001.05.18
X-AIMime: MIME/SMIME Lib 2.9 2.9 2001.05.18
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 15:43:36 +0800 (CST)
From: "Jeff Zhuang" <jf_zhuang at 21cn.com>
To: samba at samba.org
Subject: help me
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

Hello,

Please do me a favour.
Can I use samba to share a tape. If yes, Please tell me how to do.
Thank you very much.
-------------------------------
G at W"ILNqSJ#,JV;z5=NRJV
http://enterprise.21cn.com/game/

Return-Path: <gcarter at valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba at samba.org
Received: from dc-mx05.cluster1.charter.net
  (dc-mx05.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.15]) by lists.samba.org
  (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8459D4B34 for <samba at samba.org>; Wed, 25 Jul
  2001 06:25:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [24.240.85.8] (HELO pogo.plainjoe.org) by
  dc-mx05.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP
  id 17129167; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 09:36:05 -0400
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 08:33:18 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gerald Carter <gcarter at valinux.com>
X-X-Sender: <gcarter at pogo.plainjoe.org>
To: Andrew Crum <acrum at oculustech.com>
Cc: Dragos Delcea <dragos.delcea at farmexim.ro>, <samba at samba.org>
Subject: Re: Samba with PAM
In-Reply-To: <3B5DA00D.6D54B914 at oculustech.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107250832350.1091-100000 at pogo.plainjoe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Andrew Crum wrote:

> Thanks for your reply. Is it possible to use PAM with encrypted
> passwords? I know why plaintext passwords have to be used, but is
> there *ANY* way encrypted passwords can be used with PAM?

'encrypt passwords = yes' always requires an smbpasswd file
because the PAM interface is not robust enogh to handle
the NTLM challeng/response authentication model.






cheers, jerry
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
 http://www.valinux.com/     VA Linux Systems      gcarter at valinux.com
 http://www.samba.org/          SAMBA Team             jerry at samba.org
 http://www.plainjoe.org/                           jerry at plainjoe.org
 --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--

Return-Path: <mfischer at to.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from to.com (fw.to.com [194.221.251.1]) by lists.samba.org
  (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDCE4BA7 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 25
  Jul 2001 06:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elwood.think (unknown [192.168.10.15]) by to.com
  (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482AD17004E for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed,
  25 Jul 2001 15:48:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by elwood.think (Postfix, from userid 1068) id D43E946750;
  Wed, 25 Jul 2001 15:48:14 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 15:48:14 +0200
From: Mika Fischer <mfischer at to.com>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Default logon script
Message-ID: <20010725154814.A3613 at to.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

Hi!

I am facing the following problem:

We want that all users coming from one machine use a special logon script
and all other users on all other machines use a default logon script.

I don't see if this is easily possible, as there's no way of setting a
default logon script.

I hope someone can clarify...

TIA,
 Mika Fischer
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mika Fischer                                          mika.fischer at to.com
Thinking Objects Software GmbH                  phone:  +49.711.88770.154
Lilienthalstra_e 2                              mobile:   +49.175.5249209
70825 Stuttgart-Korntal, Germany                fax:    +49.711.88770.449
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Return-Path: <gcarter at valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from dc-mx08.cluster1.charter.net
  (dc-mx08.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.18]) by lists.samba.org
  (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93009473B for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 25
  Jul 2001 06:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [24.240.85.8] (HELO pogo.plainjoe.org) by
  dc-mx08.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP
  id 15413810; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 09:37:59 -0400
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 08:34:30 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gerald Carter <gcarter at valinux.com>
X-X-Sender: <gcarter at pogo.plainjoe.org>
To: Brian Ballsun-Stanton <lists at pax.ath.cx>
Cc: <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Samba as a PDC for win2k
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0107231646040.9094-100000 at raven.pax.ath.cx>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107250834160.1091-100000 at pogo.plainjoe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Brian Ballsun-Stanton wrote:

> After struggling to set up samba-tng as a pdc (debian woody) for my
> network, I'm interested in seeing if you guys recommend 2.2.1 as a PDC /
> profile controller. Thanks.

Yes.







cheers, jerry
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
 http://www.valinux.com/     VA Linux Systems      gcarter at valinux.com
 http://www.samba.org/          SAMBA Team             jerry at samba.org
 http://www.plainjoe.org/                           jerry at plainjoe.org
 --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--

Return-Path: <coolsky at mic.com.tw>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from mr1.mic.com.tw (mr1.mic.com.tw [203.66.161.8]) by
  lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D90420F for
  <samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 02:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linko3.mic.com.tw (linko3.mic.com.tw [10.88.0.18]) by
  mr1.mic.com.tw (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f6P9aMZ09680 for
  <samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 17:36:22 +0800 (CST)
Received: by linko3.mic.com.tw with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
  id <PRF25B02>; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 17:37:08 +0800
Message-ID: <1624058E4769D5119C7800306E002CCA088996 at MRSPDC>
From: =?big5?B?Y29vbHNreSBbpraz36xLXQ==?= <coolsky at mic.com.tw>
To: "'samba at lists.samba.org'" <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: =?big5?B?tarOYDogc2FtYmEgZGlnZXN0LCBWb2wgMSAjNTAxIC0gMzggbXNncw
  ==?=
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 16:45:18 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

When I use "smbmount command" mount remote directory of a samba server, the
owner and group of mounted files is the use who mount it. How can I solve
the problem?

Return-Path: <drjung at sprynet.com>
Delivered-To: samba at us5.samba.org
Received: from usgrant.trismegistus.net
  (crtntx1-ar6-033-095.crtntx1.dsl.gtei.net [4.41.33.95]) by
  lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4158E453E for
  <samba at us5.samba.org>; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 02:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sprynet.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
  usgrant.trismegistus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A93143; Wed, 25 Jul
  2001 04:19:16 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <3B5E8F14.E5C2E979 at sprynet.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 04:19:16 -0500
From: "J. C. Woods" <drjung at sprynet.com>
Organization: Celtic Pride, Inc.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-4.1mdk i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: root <drankin at cox-internet.com>
Cc: Samba <samba at us5.samba.org>, mandrake <expert at linux-mandrake.com>
Subject: Re: [expert] Upgrading LM 7.2 Samba 2.09 to Samba 2.2.1a
  Impossible?
References: <3B5E4927.5E171EED at cox-internet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

Root,

I am not sure of where you heard about samba-2.2.1 binary rpm being
installed on LMDK7.2 but I must add a few words of caution. Have you
upgraded your glibc? I ask this because samba-2.2.1 has the requirement
of an installed glibc-2.2 and, unless you did the upgrade, LMDK7.2 comes
with glibc-2.1. The samba-2.2.1 binary rpm will not install on LMDK7.2.
If you think you have nightmares with your new samba install, just try
upgrading to glibc-2.2.

If you want to keep your rpm database consistent and viable, your best
hope is to use the src rpm for samba-2.2.1, and do a lot of praying. I
just went through a very similar situation when I tried to upgrade to
bind 9 on LMDK7.2. Bind 9 also needed to have a working glibc-2.2. So I
was forced into doing a lot of upgrading on a wide variety of packages
just so I could rebuild the bind 9 src rpm. It took a lot of time and
work but in the end I was able to get my bind 9 rpms rebuilt for a
LMDK7.2 glibc-2.1 system.

And guess what? Notwithstanding all of the excellent help I received
from such people as Jose S. and kk1, the bind 9 rpms still would not
install. Even though my rebuild of the src rpm seemed to work, i.e. I
had my bind 9 binary rpms all neatly produced in the
"/usr/src/RPM/RPMS/I686" folder, they would not work. When I did a test
on these binary rpms, I got error messages. When Mandrake says
"glibc_2.2 required", hell they really mean it! 

If you *REALLY* need samba-2.2.1, you might want to wait until you have
the time to bring your platform up to 8.0 glibc-2.2 standards.
Otherwise, you are in for a rocky ride.

BTW I have samba 2.0.10 running on my network, and it does all I could
ever ask of a samba server. If I may be so presumptuous, may I ask what
the need is for samba-2.2.1. I do have a samba 2.2.1 server running on
LMDK8.0, and it does not do anything better than my samba server-2.0.10.

Just a few thoughts for your edification....

drjung


root wrote:
> 
> Ok, Mandrake experts and Samba crew:
> 
>         Were going to get to the bottom of this ; ) (At least for my
> etification and hopefully others). The problem is simple, I have a test
> machine (mirror to my real server) that I wan't to upgrade from Samba
> 2.09 to 2.2.1a. Mandrake 7.2 with 2.2.19 kernel is the current version.
> No, there hasn't been a pressing need for me to try LM 8.0, I use the
> 7.2 server as the only server for 5 WinXX clients and it does ssh, ftp,
> telnet, http (and htpts), pptp vpn, pop3, imap, and telnet quite nicely.
> Don't have NT or Win2K, never have, and probably never will. I may need
> trust relationships between a NT domain and my office in the future, but
> that is another fish to fry.
> 
>         The problem - How in the HECK do I get Samba 2.2.1a to install over my
> current setup. You guys are awesome, but I'm not upgrading to  LM 8.0
> just to get Samba 2.2.1a to install. (period) I'm a stupid lawyer and
> professional engineer (aero) and don't have the time to devote to a
> complete version change at the moment. (numerous reasons - parenthood
> the most pressing). (Brandon hold your comments young man -- we'll talk
> later)
> 
>         Background, I can't get Samba 2.2.1a to install from the Mandrake rpm
> over my current setup. Specifically, the samba-2.2.1a-4mdk.i586.rpm,
> samba-client-2.2.1a-4mdk.i586.rpm, and samba-common-2.2.1a-4mdk.i586.rpm
> will not install over my present setup. I get dependency errors
> concerning:
> 
> pam-devel-0.72-12mdk; (I installed pam-devel-0.72-12mdk and fixed this);
> but installing from the src.rpm, I get
> 
> Installing samba-2_2_1a-4mdk_src.rpm
> error: failed build dependencies:
>         libcups-devel is needed by samba-2.2.1a-4mdk
> 
> OK, that being so, I downloaded all of the cups upgrades;
> 
> cups-1_1_9-4mdk_i586.rpm*
> cups-drivers-1_0-31mdk_i586.rpm*
> libcups1-devel-1_1_9-4mdk_i586.rpm*
> cups-common-1_1_9-4mdk_i586.rpm*
> libcups1-1_1_9-4mdk_i586.rpm*
> 
> and tried to upgrade cups, but;
> 
> [root at Skyline cups]# rpm -Uvh cups*
> error: failed dependencies:
>         libcups1 >= 1.1.9-4mdk is needed by cups-1.1.9-4mdk
>         libcups.so.2   is needed by cups-1.1.9-4mdk
>         libcupsimage.so.2   is needed by cups-1.1.9-4mdk
>         libcups1 >= 1.1.9-4mdk is needed by cups-common-1.1.9-4mdk
>         libcups.so.2   is needed by cups-common-1.1.9-4mdk
>         libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2)   is needed by cups-common-1.1.9-4mdk
>         ghostscript >= 5.50-65mdk is needed by cups-drivers-1.0-31mdk
>         libcups.so.2 is needed by cups-drivers-1.0-31mdk
>         libcupsimage.so.2 is needed by cups-drivers-1.0-31mdk
>         libcups.so.2 is needed by samba-client-2.0.9-1.1mdk
>         libcups.so.2 is needed by samba-common-2.0.9-1.1mdk
>         libcups.so.2 is needed by xpp-0.6-16mdk
>         libcups.so.2 is needed by samba-2.0.9-1.1mdk
> 
> I have tried installing the libcups packages first -- to no avail; see
> below:
> 
> [root at Skyline cups]# rpm -Uvh lib*
> error: failed dependencies:
>         openssl-devel is needed by libcups1-devel-1.1.9-4mdk
> 
> So I'm at a quandry -- Where am I going wrong. I have read about many
> successful installs of 2.2.1a over LM 7.2, what I want know is -- How
> did you do it? Any help will be greatly appreciated. I just love getting
> to bed before 0200, and if I get this solved, I probably will.
> 
> --
> David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E.
> ASEL -- Instrument
> Nacogdoches, Texas
> N31 34.7 W094 42.6
> 355 MSL

Return-Path: <prabusubroto at yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from web14702.mail.yahoo.com (web14702.mail.yahoo.com
  [216.136.224.119]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 54D27453E
  for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 02:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20010725092200.73721.qmail at web14702.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [149.225.195.208] by web14702.mail.yahoo.com; Wed, 25 Jul
  2001 02:22:00 PDT
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 02:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Prabu Subroto <prabusubroto at yahoo.com>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: (no subject)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/

Return-Path: <prabusubroto at yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from web14702.mail.yahoo.com (web14702.mail.yahoo.com
  [216.136.224.119]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1548453E
  for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 02:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20010725092110.73632.qmail at web14702.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [149.225.195.208] by web14702.mail.yahoo.com; Wed, 25 Jul
  2001 02:21:10 PDT
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 02:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Prabu Subroto <prabusubroto at yahoo.com>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: (no subject)
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/

Return-Path: <gcarter at valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba at lists.samba.org
Received: from dc-mx04.cluster1.charter.net
  (dc-mx04.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.14]) by lists.samba.org
  (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13D64524 for <samba at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 25
  Jul 2001 06:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [24.240.85.8] (HELO pogo.plainjoe.org) by
  dc-mx04.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP
  id 16141363; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 09:49:12 -0400
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 08:45:46 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gerald Carter <gcarter at valinux.com>
X-X-Sender: <gcarter at pogo.plainjoe.org>
To: "Rogelio J. Baucells" <rogelio at ats-corp.com>
Cc: "'samba at lists.samba.org'" <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: winbindd problem
In-Reply-To: <70603A72A37FD411B11600600898FB76039354 at stimpy.ats-corp.com
  >
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107250844580.1091-100000 at pogo.plainjoe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/

On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Rogelio J. Baucells wrote:

> Hello
>
> I am new to this mailing list and I do not know if this problem has been
> talked before.
>
> I got and installed the samba HEAD branch of cvs repository
> (7/22/2001). I configured samba and it is working without any problem,
> I has spent 2 days trying to make winbindd work without any success. I
> joined the computer running samba to my domain using './smbpasswd -j
> DOMAIN -r PDC'. I can see the samba server and its shares without any
> problem.



More information about the samba mailing list