No subject

Mon Dec 1 11:08:19 GMT 2003

gid=500) (pid 30102)
[2000/11/30 10:44:37, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2516)
  call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented.

uname -a: Linux ***** 2.2.14-5.0smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 7 21:01:40 EST 2000 i686
unknown
smbd -V: Version 2.0.7
nmbd -V: Version 2.0.7
rpm -a -q | grep samba: samba-common-2.0.7-4 samba-client-2.0.7-4
samba-2.0.7-4
ls -l samba*:
-rw-rw-r-- 4312642 Oct 18 11:54 samba-2.0.7-4.i386.rpm
-rw-rw-r-- 881787 Oct 18 12:20 samba-client-2.0.7-4.i386.rpm
-rw-rw-r-- 710168 Oct 18 12:16 samba-common-2.0.7-4.i386.rpm

I was attempting to check something into VisualSourceSafe that was on a
Samba Share.
I suspect it was trying to muck with the permissions to make the file
read-only.
The checkout on this file worked fine.

Michael King
mike808 at users.sourceforge.net

------_=_NextPart_001_01C05BC4.626B7120
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>call_nt_transact_ioctl Currently not implemented</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

I have seen several notices that this is an ongoing =
issue (the first notices started in 1999 with indications in early 2000 =
that it was being addressed). Has there been any progress on the =
infamous

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2516)</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&nbsp; call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not =
implemented.</FONT>
</P>

problem? I've also seen the number 2401 instead of =
2516.
 Can someone please at least respond how we can help =
fix the problem ourselves (where to start might be nice) if you decide =
_not_ to take any action? The silence following the previous posters on =
this same topic has not been encouraging.

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Here's my particulars.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>From the logs:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>[2000/11/30 09:49:12, 1] =
smbd/service.c:make_connection(550)</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&nbsp; ***** (***.***.***.***) connect to service =
awardhq as user *** (uid=3D500, gid=3D500) (pid 30102)</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>[2000/11/30 10:44:37, 0] =
smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2516)</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&nbsp; call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not =
implemented.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>uname -a: Linux ***** 2.2.14-5.0smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 7 =
21:01:40 EST 2000 i686 unknown</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>smbd -V: Version 2.0.7</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>nmbd -V: Version 2.0.7</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>rpm -a -q | grep samba: samba-common-2.0.7-4 =
samba-client-2.0.7-4 samba-2.0.7-4</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>ls -l samba*:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>-rw-rw-r-- 4312642 Oct 18 11:54 =
samba-2.0.7-4.i386.rpm</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>-rw-rw-r-- 881787 Oct 18 12:20 =
samba-client-2.0.7-4.i386.rpm</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>-rw-rw-r-- 710168 Oct 18 12:16 =
samba-common-2.0.7-4.i386.rpm</FONT>
</P>
<BR>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>I was attempting to check something into =
VisualSourceSafe that was on a Samba Share.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>I suspect it was trying to muck with the permissions =
to make the file read-only.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>The checkout on this file worked fine.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Michael King</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>mike808 at users.sourceforge.net</FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C05BC4.626B7120--