[Samba] Re: Samba vs. Windows : significant difference in timestamp
handling ?
Dragan Krnic
dkrnic at lycos.com
Fri Aug 15 15:35:25 GMT 2003
>>>|> after file is closed:
>>>|> Test.ppt mtime->12:49:16, ctime->12:49:16, atime->12:49:16
>>>|>
>>>|> ... still looks new to me !
>>>>
>>>> Not my experience. Even after doing the fake
>>>> number the mtime remains unmodified, atime gets
>>>> changed, of course, and, what was not quite to
>>>> expect, so does the ctime.
>
> IMPORTANT UPDATE:
> My above experience was made as DOMAIN\Administrator.
> However, I tested it with several ordinary users and
> by all of them only the access time is affected. The
> ctime and mtime remain the same, as long as no change
> is committed to the disk.
ONE MORE:
The test PPT file I used as seen by Explorer after
viewing and closing it with faked identity:
File Created Modified Accessed
ppt.ppt 12.08.2003 17:43 12.08.2003 17:43 15.08.2003 16:45
The same file seen with Linux command stat:
# stat ppt.ppt
File: `ppt.ppt'
Size: 8192 Blocks: 16 IO Block: 4096 regular file
Device: 6801h/26625d Inode: 186323 Links: 1
Access: (0774/-rwxrwxr--) Uid:(0/root) Gid:(0/root)
Access: 2003-08-15 16:45:38.000000000 +0100
Modify: 2003-08-12 17:43:09.000000000 +0100
Change: 2003-08-15 16:45:38.000000000 +0100
The ctime gets changed whenever atime changes!?
Windows shows mtime as both mtime and ctime.?!
Is it a bug or a feature?
____________________________________________________________
Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail!
http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005
More information about the samba
mailing list