[Samba] Is 2.2.6 Final?

[Chris Tooley]

On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 09:17, Markus Schabel wrote:
> John H Terpstra wrote:
> 
> >On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote:
> >
> >>Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of
> >>samba_2_2 CVS branch.
> >>    
> >>
> >Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release.
> >
> So there will never be a stable samba again? ;)
> 
Note the te in that word?  Hopefully 3.X will be stable.

> >We hope that this will be our
> >last update. All samba-team resources are now focussing on getting 3.0.0
> >readt for release. Right now 3.0.0 is still changing significantly and we
> >would not recommend it's use in a production environment.
> >
Hooray!

> >>We've got six systems running it with no visible issues.
> >>    
> >>
> >If it is not broken then why fix it?
> >
> the last version I had problems with was 2.2.3a (on a SuSE system) and 
> 2.2.4 (there were problems with LDAP, all solved since 2.2.5)
> 
> >>I'm currently testing CVS from Sunday's pull of 3.0...is this the
> >>direction I should be heading?
> >>    
> >>
> >Yes. But do your home work. Test, test, test, and give us feedback.
> >
> I'm currently working on a PDC for about 300 LDAP-based users, I guess 
> with LDAP there is no problem when migrating to 3.0? Probably I'll run 
> the actual CVS parallel....
> 
> regards
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba