[Samba] Samba 3.0 alpha20-2 and Win2k SP3

[Irving Carrion]

Thanks for the reply Brad.  I just looked at the registry and it is
indeed set to:

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameter
s]
"requiresignorseal"=dword:00000000

I would be glad to submit a log but no developer has asked for it, so
I'm afraid it will just be ignored.

I'm currently using the "use spnego = no" option in my smb.conf file.

Shall I submit this to the technical samba list?

Anyway, thanks for your help!
IRV

-----Original Message-----
From: samba-admin at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin at lists.samba.org]
On Behalf Of Bradley W. Langhorst
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Irving Carrion
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 alpha20-2 and Win2k SP3


On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 14:37, Irving Carrion wrote:
> Is there anyone on the list that has been able to get Win2k SP3
working
> with the 3.0 alpha version?
> 
> I'm able to join but I can NOT log in.  I can see the machine account
> listed in pass.tdb (using pdbedit -l) and it is also in passwd &
shadow.
> I HAVE ALSO APPLIED THE SIGN OR SEAL PATCH.  The message I get is:
this sounds exactly like the signorseal problem
are you sure that every occurrence in the registry has changed?
the patch sometimes won't do it - you have to search manually
 
> I've looked through the docs but see nothing about using SP3 and
Samba.
> Also, the log level 3 looks cryptic to me.
> 
if the signorseal stuff is really set everywhere in the registry 
then you should post a relevant excerpt of that log here.

Make sure the the log is from only one machine so it's easier to follow
(use log.smbd.%m)

There used to be a setting called spnego that i had to set to 'no'
but this was fixed a while ago.  might be worth a try.

brad

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba