[Samba] ClearCase and Samba

Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 AJAVID1 at motorola.com
Wed Oct 2 18:18:48 GMT 2002


I think the difference between domain and server is listed in all most all
books and you can find in archives also.
how many clearcase clients access vobs and views via samba
whats hardware and OS like on passwd server
 

-----Original Message-----
From: SPURGEON_MATHEW_D at Lilly.com [mailto:SPURGEON_MATHEW_D at Lilly.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1
Cc: HOLT_STEVEN at Lilly.com; samba-admin at lists.samba.org;
samba at lists.samba.org; WEBBER_LARRY at Lilly.com
Subject: RE: [Samba] ClearCase and Samba



What are the problems or concerns around DOMAIN vs SERVER?  More
specifically what impact does it have on the WINDOWS domain? 

# Samba config file created using SWAT 
# Date: 2002/09/20 12:51:09 

# Global parameters 
[global] 
        workgroup = INDY 
        netbios name = SUNTST1 
        security = SERVER 
        encrypt passwords = Yes 
        map to guest = Bad User 
        password server = ***.***.***.*** 
        username map = /usr/local/samba/lib/username.map 
        lanman auth = No 
        log level = 3 
        log file = /usr/local/samba/log/samba.%m 
        max open files = 30000 
        wins server = ***.***.***.*** 
        kernel oplocks = No 
        remote announce = ***.***.***.*** 
        create mask = 0775 
        security mask = 0775 
        directory mask = 0775         
        directory security mask = 0775 
        oplocks = No 

[viewstore] 
        comment = Clearcase Viewstore 
        path = /clearcase/viewstore 
        read only = No 

[vobstore] 
        comment = Clearcase Vobstore 
        path = /clearcase/vobstore 
        read only = No 



Mathew Spurgeon
Eli Lilly and Company
Software Engineering Support Team
Phone: (317)  276-7436
Mobile:  (317)  716-7789
http://mcntstep03.d51.lilly.com/SEST
mspurgeon at lilly.com 



	Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 <AJAVID1 at motorola.com> 
Sent by: samba-admin at lists.samba.org 


10/02/2002 11:28 AM 


        
        To:        "'Bradley W. Langhorst'" <brad at langhorst.com>,
SPURGEON_MATHEW_D at LILLY.COM 
        cc:        samba at lists.samba.org, WEBBER_LARRY at LILLY.COM 
        Subject:        RE: [Samba] ClearCase and Samba



yes, secuirty=server is not a good option, it keeps your auth connection
even after auth is done, so thats the reason prob after a while password
serer was rejecting users,
you should monitor your windows password server as to what it is doing

-----Original Message-----
From: Bradley W. Langhorst [mailto:brad at langhorst.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:13 AM
To: SPURGEON_MATHEW_D at LILLY.COM
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org; WEBBER_LARRY at LILLY.COM
Subject: Re: [Samba] ClearCase and Samba


security=SERVER is fraught with troubles...
have you considered using security=DOMAIN?

On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 11:54, SPURGEON_MATHEW_D at LILLY.COM wrote:
> In August we started having windows domain controller issues.  Could it be

> the number of users that are running ClearCase at a given point in time? 
> We have between 40 - 70 users accessing the VOBs at any given time.  The 
> samba config file is setup not run  security = SERVER. 
> 
> The error logs:
> [2002/10/02 10:38:15, 2] passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:(170)
>   startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file 
> /usr/local/samba/private/smbpa
> sswd. Error was No such file or directory
> [2002/10/02 10:38:15, 0] passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:(1367)
>   unable to open passdb database.
> [2002/10/02 10:38:15, 1] smbd/password.c:(555)
>   Couldn't find user 'rm38144' in passdb.
> [2002/10/02 10:38:15, 2] smbd/reply.c:(962)
>   NT Password did not match for user 'rm38144'!
> [2002/10/02 10:38:15, 1] smbd/reply.c:(998)
>   Rejecting user 'rm38144': bad password
> [2002/10/02 10:38:15, 3] smbd/error.c:(91)
>   error string = No such file or directory
> [2002/10/02 10:38:15, 3] smbd/error.c:(103)
>   error packet at smbd/reply.c(1000) cmd=115 (SMBsesssetupX) 
> NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAI
> LURE
> [2002/10/02 10:38:15, 3] smbd/process.c:(860)
>   Transaction 397 of length 74
> 
> I see that the NT Password did not match for user rm38144, however the NT 
> password and the UNIX password are the same.  Could this be something with

> the clearcase_albd account?
> 
the interesting part of the transactionis higher in the log i think
security=SERVER is tried first then 
falls through to smbpasswd if there is some problem.
all I'm seeing is the part after falling through to smbpasswd (which
does not exist in your case)

brad

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba




-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed


More information about the samba mailing list