[Samba] smbd weirdness
Robert Adkins
raa at impelind.com
Sat Nov 23 15:36:01 GMT 2002
Michael,
Have you run the smbclient -L <servername> while logged in as a user
that has access to the server? Do this from a terminal connection that is
on the Samba server in question. This should give you some information as
to why it isn't quite doing what it should be doing.
Another thing that might have occurred is that during your upgrade one
or more libraries and other packages, that the hand-built Samba install
was dependent upon could have been changed or replaced with something
that your Samba install is unable to utilize.
If you are running Redhat and upgraded to 7.3 or even 8.0 do a quick
check by uninstalling or simply moving your current Samba install and
replace it with the latest RPM version of it. During the RPM install you
should either receive several errors about missing libraries and such or
have a clean install occur. If the latter happens put your settings into
the smb.conf created by the RPM and see what happens.
I have a feeling that one or more packages were inadvertently skipped or
added to the install at this one site, that hadn't been done to the other
servers that were upgraded.
I hope that helps, let me know if my suggestion takes care of the issue.
Regards,
Robert Adkins II
IT Manager/Buyer
Impel Industries, Inc.
Ph. 586-254-5800
Fx. 586-254-5804
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Robinton [mailto:michael at bizsystems.com]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 3:21 PM
To: Robert Adkins
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: [Samba] smbd weirdness
> Michael,
>
> I am unsure what you mean by "locked out" could you clarify? Do you
> mean
> that they connect and are able to browse, read and write to files in
> the share, but when the users come back to the share later they
> are unable to do those tasks, or are you saying that they are
> never able to see the server and that when they attempt to connect
> to the server/share, they are given the message that they are
> unable to connect.
>
> I would confirm that all the file permissions are properly set for
> the
> shares. Other then that, I am unsure what could be causing your
> issues.
>
the windows client is unable to connect, the message is that the
server is not found. Upon examining the job table, there are several
smbd instances running and no clients connected. This is a vanilla
installation at a site that has been working for a couple of years.
The other site belongs to them as well. I recently upgraded the OS to
a newer version of linux distribution and kernel though the samba
distributions were built by hand. Only one site exhibits this
behavior. The problem is intermittant in that when it does happen I
find the running copies of smbd whereas normally there would be none
unless a client connected. I dont' understand why smbd terminates
properly under some circumstances and not others.???
> Regards,
> Robert Adkins II
> IT Manager/Buyer
> Impel Industries, Inc.
> Ph. 586-254-5800
> Fx. 586-254-5804
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Robinton [mailto:michael at bizsystems.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 1:14 PM
> To: samba at lists.samba.org; Robert Adkins
> Subject: [Samba] smbd weirdness
>
>
>
> I have two identical installations of samba v2.25 on linux boxes. On
> one system everything works fine but on the other, copies of smbd
> start but never terminate. The result is that the winduhs boxes that
> are trying to access the samba share get locked out and never find
> the samba server. The configurations of the two systems are
> identical and I am unable to determine why one works and the other
> does not.
>
> smbd and nmbd are started from inetd.
>
> Any ideas.
>
> Michael
>
> --
More information about the samba
mailing list