[Samba] smbd weirdness

[Michael Robinton]

> Michael,
>
>  I am unsure what you mean by "locked out" could you clarify? Do you
>  mean
> that they connect and are able to browse, read and write to files in
> the   share, but when the users come back to the share later they
> are unable to   do those tasks, or are you saying that they are
> never able to see the   server and that when they attempt to connect
> to the server/share, they   are given the message that they are
> unable to connect.
>
>  I would confirm that all the file permissions are properly set for
>  the
> shares. Other then that, I am unsure what could be causing your
> issues.
>

the windows client is unable to connect, the message is that the
server is not found. Upon examining the job table, there are several
smbd instances running and no clients connected. This is a vanilla
installation at a site that has been working for a couple of years.
The other site belongs to them as well. I recently upgraded the OS to
a newer version of linux distribution and kernel though the samba
distributions were built by hand. Only one site exhibits this
behavior. The problem is intermittant in that when it does happen I
find the running copies of smbd whereas normally there would be none
unless a client connected. I dont' understand why smbd terminates
properly under some circumstances and not others.???

> Regards,
> Robert Adkins II
> IT Manager/Buyer
> Impel Industries, Inc.
> Ph. 586-254-5800
> Fx. 586-254-5804
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Robinton [mailto:michael at bizsystems.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 1:14 PM
> To: samba at lists.samba.org; Robert Adkins
> Subject: [Samba] smbd weirdness
>
>
>
> I have two identical installations of samba v2.25 on linux boxes. On
> one system everything works fine but on the other, copies of smbd
> start but never terminate. The result is that the winduhs boxes that
> are trying to access the samba share get locked out and never find
> the samba server.   The configurations of the two systems are
> identical and I am unable to determine why one works and the other
> does not.
>
> smbd and nmbd are started from inetd.
>
> Any ideas.
>
> Michael
>
>  --